I wanted to relax. I knew I needed a break. Here was an opportunity to take one.

Instead, I felt restless and anxious, bordering on panic. I physically wanted to get up and do something while believing that stopping was exactly what I needed.

It felt, quite frankly, as though I did not know how.

I am a licensed clinical social worker. I can talk about coping skills, stress, and the importance of taking care of ourselves. Yet there I was, struggling with something that sounds almost embarrassingly simple: having a little time to myself.

And I knew the opportunity would end. Every minute spent trying to settle down was a minute I could not get back.

That afternoon left me with a question:

What do you do when you finally have an opportunity to rest, but feel too uncomfortable to enjoy it?

We talk about setting boundaries, protecting our time, and stepping away from work. All of that matters. But making room for rest does not necessarily tell us how to feel comfortable once we get there.

Having time and feeling at ease are different things

An empty space in the calendar tells us something about our obligations. It does not tell us how we will feel during that space.

Anxiety can occur without an immediate threat. Having fewer demands in front of us does not guarantee that apprehension or physical tension will disappear.

The difficulty may take different forms. Someone might keep thinking about unfinished work. Someone else might feel guilty doing something enjoyable. Another person might experience physical unease without being able to identify a particular worry.

That distinction matters. We do not always have a clear thought to examine or a task to put on tomorrow’s list. Sometimes the most accurate description is that we feel uncomfortable and want to move.

It would be easy to turn my Sunday into a tidy explanation about productivity, avoidance, or control. Those possibilities might deserve consideration. None becomes true simply because it sounds insightful.

Understanding the problem begins with noticing what is actually happening.

When trying to relax increases anxiety

Researchers have studied relaxation-induced anxiety, in which people become more anxious during attempts to relax.

One proposed explanation involves discomfort with a sharp change from feeling calm to feeling distressed. Remaining worried may feel like staying prepared. Worry can alert us to something that needs attention, but continuing to worry is different from taking useful action.

A small 2019 study found support for a relationship between sensitivity to these emotional shifts and anxiety during relaxation. It examined structured exercises in college students, so it cannot explain every difficult afternoon.

The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health also acknowledges that some people report increased anxiety, intrusive thoughts, or fear of losing control during relaxation techniques.

Difficulty relaxing deserves attention. It does not establish that you are careless, ungrateful, or incapable of taking care of yourself.

“Just relax” names an outcome. It offers very little help getting there.

Does rest have to mean doing nothing?

One assumption I brought to Sunday deserves examination: I needed rest, so I needed to do nothing.

Those may not have been the same need.

Taking a break from demands and experiencing a feeling of relaxation are different things. We can make space for a break without being able to produce calm on command.

Rest might include sitting quietly. It might also include listening to music, reading for pleasure, taking an unhurried walk, or spending time with someone whose company we enjoy. Movement does not automatically disqualify an experience from being restful.

A useful question is: What am I asking of myself during this activity?

Can I enjoy it without improving at it? Can I leave it unfinished? Does it have to produce something useful?

We do not need to examine every pleasant activity until it stops being pleasant. But it is worth noticing when our break contains the same expectations we were trying to step away from.

Three places to begin

(1) Notice what is interrupting the break

Try to describe the experience without passing judgment on yourself.

“My body feels restless.”

“I keep thinking about what I have left to do.”

“I am watching the time and worrying that I am wasting it.”

These descriptions offer a starting point. “I am terrible at relaxing” leaves you with a verdict.

You do not have to identify a hidden cause before responding to what you notice.

(2) Choose something manageable and appealing

If sitting in silence feels difficult, consider something gentle that you actually enjoy. Listen to a familiar song, read a few pages, or step outside.

Choose a small beginning rather than requiring yourself to use an entire afternoon well. You can decide what comes next after you have started.

An activity that is unpleasant or unsuitable can be changed. If you enjoy it but keep interrupting yourself to check whether you feel calm yet, consider returning your attention to the activity before deciding it has failed.

That does not mean forcing yourself through overwhelming or escalating distress.

(3) Reduce the demand for an immediate result

It is understandable to want relief. But repeatedly asking, “Am I relaxed yet?” adds an evaluation to every moment.

Try directing your attention back to the experience you chose: the music, the page, the view. Some discomfort may remain alongside a moment of interest or enjoyment.

The question can be smaller: Is there anything here I can enjoy or engage with right now?

When the problem needs more attention

If anxiety repeatedly interferes with rest, sleep, relationships, or daily life, seek professional support. New, severe, or unexplained physical symptoms also deserve medical attention rather than an automatic assumption that they are anxiety. An assessment can help clarify what is happening and what treatment fits.

Sometimes the circumstances need attention too. A relaxation exercise cannot provide missing childcare, resolve financial uncertainty, or make an unsustainable workload reasonable.

We can learn ways to respond to discomfort while also asking whether our lives contain enough practical support and protected time.

Epilogue

Adulthood brings responsibilities and privileges I would not wish away. I love my family. I care about my work. But an uninterrupted afternoon is something I cannot reliably recreate simply because the last one did not go well.

Knowing that added pressure to Sunday.

With every minute, I was experiencing anxiety while also losing some of the time I had hoped would relieve it. The more aware I became of the shrinking opportunity, the more urgently I wanted to settle down.

Please relax. You are running out of time to relax.

There may be smaller moments tomorrow. I want to recognize those. But five quiet minutes tomorrow will not give me back the afternoon I wanted today. We can acknowledge that disappointment without dismissing the smaller opportunities or pretending they are equivalent.

Sometimes the moment passes before we find our way into it.

That is where I think we need humility and grace.

Humility means accepting that insight and effort do not give us complete control over an experience. Grace concerns how we treat ourselves afterward.

I hesitate over the word “wasted,” even though that is how the time can feel. It suggests a carelessness that was never there. I wanted to enjoy those hours. I was trying.

I can wish the afternoon had gone differently without spending the evening blaming myself. I can acknowledge that I needed rest and did not get what I hoped for, without deciding that I failed.

There may still be something to learn or change. I can return to those questions without making their resolution a condition of moving on.

For now, I would like to let that afternoon end.

And when another opportunity comes, I would like to meet it without asking it to make up for the one I lost.

A brief, shameless plug

If this felt familiar and you would like support understanding what makes it difficult to slow down, I offer online individual therapy for adults in Pennsylvania through A Perceptual Shift.

My approach is collaborative and practical, with attention to both the patterns you experience and the circumstances around you.

Learn more about therapy and whether working together might be a good fit.

For paid subscribers, the Afterthoughts below go further: how to choose an approach that fits what interrupts your rest, decide when to adjust it, and respond when the first thing you try does not help.

Read more

Sometimes it is a joke. Sometimes it is a genuine concern. Sometimes it is someone reaching for the only language they have to explain why their emotional life feels unpredictable.

I recently put together a lesson on bipolar I and bipolar II for the social workers I supervise. Preparing it brought me back to a distinction that deserves more attention outside clinical conversations: experiencing changes in mood and meeting the criteria for a mood disorder are different things.

That distinction matters because an explanation influences what we do next.

Finding a name for an experience can be a relief. It can make something confusing feel understandable. But a familiar label can also bring us to a conclusion before we have adequately examined the evidence.

Bipolar disorder has a specific clinical meaning. Understanding it requires us to look beyond whether someone feels “up and down.”

Start with the episode

You can feel hopeful in the morning, discouraged after a difficult conversation, irritated in traffic, and content while eating dinner with your family.

Those changes, by themselves, do not establish bipolar disorder.

The central question is whether you have experienced a distinct episode: a sustained period when a particular group of symptoms occurred together and represented a noticeable departure from your usual functioning.

We look at mood, but also energy, activity, sleep, thinking, speech, judgment, and consequences. We ask when the changes began, how consistently they occurred, and how long they lasted.

We also ask what else could explain them.

Substances, medications, medical conditions, and other psychiatric conditions can produce overlapping symptoms. Matching a symptom list and a duration threshold is insufficient if another explanation better accounts for the presentation.

The criteria discussed here are plain-language summaries of the DSM-5-TR framework. They are useful for understanding what clinicians assess, but they are not a stand-alone diagnostic test.

What mania actually involves

A manic episode involves an unusually elevated, expansive, or irritable mood together with persistently increased energy or activity.

“Expansive” can describe an unusually unrestrained mood, with exaggerated confidence, enthusiasm, or familiarity with others. Mania can also be predominantly irritable. Someone does not have to appear happy to be manic.

During the same period, at least three of the following symptoms must be present, or four if the mood is exclusively irritable:

• Inflated self-esteem or grandiosity: a substantial, uncharacteristic exaggeration of confidence, importance, or ability.

• Reduced need for sleep: sleeping considerably less while still feeling rested.

• Increased or pressured speech: talking much more than usual or feeling driven to keep talking.

• Racing thoughts or rapidly shifting ideas.

• Unusual distractibility.

• Increased goal-directed activity or psychomotor agitation: taking on substantially more projects or social, work, or sexual activity, or becoming unusually restless.

• Excessive involvement in activities with significant potential consequences: such as spending, sexual behavior, or financial decisions that reflect a marked departure from usual judgment.

These symptoms must represent a noticeable change from the person’s usual behavior.

The mood and energy changes last at least one week, for most of the day, nearly every day. The episode can be shorter when hospitalization is necessary because of the manic disturbance.

Severity matters as much as duration. The disturbance causes marked impairment in social or occupational functioning, requires hospitalization to prevent harm, or includes psychosis, such as delusions or hallucinations. A person can experience mania without either psychosis or a hospital admission.

One particularly useful distinction is reduced need for sleep versus difficulty sleeping.

Lying awake, wanting to sleep, and feeling exhausted the next day is different from sleeping three hours and feeling fully rested, energized, and ready to begin several major projects.

Neither experience establishes a diagnosis alone. The distinction helps us understand the larger pattern.

Hypomania has a specific threshold

Hypomania involves the same core change in mood and energy or activity, with the same associated symptom threshold: at least three symptoms from the list above, or four if the mood is exclusively irritable.

The episode lasts at least four consecutive days, for most of the day, nearly every day. It produces an unmistakable change in functioning that is uncharacteristic of the person and observable to others.

The difference from mania involves severity. Hypomania does not cause marked impairment, require hospitalization because of the elevated episode, or include psychosis.

That does not mean it has no consequences.

A person might make uncharacteristic purchases, take on commitments they cannot sustain, become unusually argumentative, or act with more confidence than their circumstances support. They may still be going to work and meeting many responsibilities.

They may also feel unusually good, which can make the episode difficult to recognize as a concern.

The comparison should be with the person’s usual, well baseline. Feeling better after depression is not automatically hypomania. And hypomania does not automatically become mania on its seventh day. Duration alone does not determine the distinction; severity matters.

Depression deserves the same attention

A major depressive episode is more than a difficult day or a period of understandable disappointment.

It involves at least five of the following nine symptom domains during the same two-week period, representing a change from previous functioning. At least one must be depressed mood or a marked loss of interest or pleasure.

1. Depressed mood for most of the day, nearly every day. This may feel like sadness, emptiness, or hopelessness.

2. Marked loss of interest or pleasure in all or almost all activities, for most of the day, nearly every day.

3. Significant appetite or weight changes, including weight loss unrelated to dieting or weight gain.

4. Insomnia or excessive sleep.

5. Observable slowing or agitation, such as noticeably slowed speech and movement or persistent pacing.

6. Fatigue or loss of energy.

7. Feelings of worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate guilt.

8. Difficulty concentrating, thinking, or making decisions.

9. Recurring thoughts of death, suicidal thoughts, a suicide plan, or a suicide attempt.

Most symptoms must occur nearly every day. The death and suicide criterion concerns recurrence, and significant weight change is assessed across the period.

The symptoms must cause clinically significant distress or impairment. Substance, medication, and medical explanations must also be considered.

Someone does not need every symptom, and depression does not always look like visible sadness. A person may describe feeling empty, disconnected, unable to enjoy anything, or unable to complete tasks that previously felt manageable.

A major depressive episode also does not, by itself, tell us whether someone has major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder. That requires the broader history.

Bipolar I and Bipolar II: What establishes each diagnosis?

Bipolar I requires at least one manic episode. Major depressive episodes are common, but they are not required to establish the diagnosis.

Bipolar II requires at least one hypomanic episode and at least one major depressive episode, with no lifetime manic episode. The depression or instability associated with alternating depression and hypomania must cause clinically significant distress or impairment.

This explains an apparent contradiction: hypomania does not cause the marked impairment associated with mania, but bipolar II can still be profoundly disruptive.

The numerals do not tell us how much someone is suffering.

Both diagnoses require the relevant exclusions to be addressed. The formal criteria also distinguish bipolar disorder from schizophrenia-spectrum and other psychotic disorders that might better explain the episodes.

These are diagnoses based on lifetime history, not simply today’s mood. Someone with bipolar I can currently be depressed or stable. A later period of hypomania does not change an established bipolar I diagnosis to bipolar II.

What the pattern might look like

Consider this fictional example.

Alex usually sleeps seven or eight hours, approaches spending cautiously, and keeps a fairly predictable routine.

For five consecutive days, Alex sleeps about three hours a night and feels rested. Their mood is unusually upbeat, their energy is substantially increased, and they talk so much that their partner struggles to enter the conversation. They begin several ambitious projects and make an expensive, uncharacteristic purchase without considering the consequences.

These changes are present for most of each day. Their partner notices a clear departure from Alex’s usual behavior. Alex continues working, without marked impairment, psychosis, or a need for hospitalization.

That history would warrant assessment for a hypomanic episode. The relevant changes occurred together, lasted long enough, and were observable.

Now suppose Alex also had a separate three-week period of depressed mood, loss of pleasure, excessive sleep, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness, and difficulty concentrating, with substantial interference in daily life.

That would warrant assessment for a major depressive episode.

If both episodes were confirmed, no manic episode had ever occurred, and the remaining criteria and exclusions were satisfied, bipolar II could be the appropriate diagnosis.

But if the activated period occurred during stimulant intoxication and was attributable to its effects, the interpretation would change. The symptoms would still matter. Their cause would matter, too.

This is why a checklist needs a timeline and context.

Rapid cycling and mixed features

“Rapid cycling” has a specific clinical meaning: at least four qualifying manic, hypomanic, or major depressive episodes within twelve months.

Episodes are separated by a switch to the opposite mood pole or by at least two months of partial or full remission. Moving between mania and hypomania alone does not represent a switch to the opposite pole.

Several emotional changes within one day do not, by themselves, meet this definition.

An episode can also have mixed features, meaning that qualifying symptoms associated with the opposite mood pole occur during it. For example, a manic episode may include prominent depressed mood, loss of pleasure, and feelings of worthlessness.

The specifier requires a particular combination of symptoms. Feeling distressed or irritable during an activated period does not automatically establish it.

People with bipolar disorder can experience changing emotions within a day. They can also have periods of relative stability. Neither reality replaces the need to establish the underlying episode history.

What to bring to an assessment

If you recognize aspects of your experience here, your observations are worth discussing.

Useful questions include:

• What changed from your usual self?

• Which symptoms occurred together?

• How long did the changes last?

• Did you sleep less and feel rested, or sleep less and feel exhausted?

• What did other people notice?

• What happened to your work, relationships, responsibilities, or judgment?

• Were substances, medications, or health changes involved?

• Have similar periods occurred before?

An online screening result can help start that conversation. It cannot establish or exclude the diagnosis on its own.

Not meeting the full criteria for bipolar I or II does not automatically mean the symptoms are insignificant. Other bipolar-related diagnoses exist, and other conditions may better explain the experience.

The duration thresholds are also not instructions to wait before seeking help. Escalating energy with very little sleep, dangerous behavior, psychosis, or an inability to stay safe warrants prompt evaluation.

You do not need to arrive with the right label. A careful description is a valuable place to begin.

Epilogue: The Most Defensible Diagnosis

The question of alternative explanations deserves particular attention in substance use treatment.

In my experience working in that world, bipolar disorder is a diagnosis I encounter frequently. I understand why. People describe substantial changes in mood, energy, sleep, activity, and judgment. Sometimes those changes resemble the episodes described above, including their duration and severity.

But they may be occurring in the context of intoxication, withdrawal, or repeated cycles of both.

Depending on the substance, intoxication can involve euphoria, increased energy, inflated confidence, reduced sleep, and impulsivity. Withdrawal can involve depressed mood, exhaustion, irritability, and disrupted sleep.

Having access to a drug may also bring relief from craving or withdrawal. Losing access may bring distress. Those experiences are important, but they do not independently establish mania or major depression.

We have to examine the relationship between the substance and the symptoms.

Did episodes occur before the substance use? Have they occurred during sustained periods without use? Do symptoms persist beyond the expected effects of intoxication or withdrawal? What do previous records and observations help establish?

A person can also have both bipolar disorder and a substance use disorder. The presence of one does not exclude the other.

Medication requires similar care. There is an important qualification involving antidepressant treatment: a full manic or hypomanic episode that begins during treatment and persists at the full syndrome level beyond the treatment’s physiological effects can count toward a bipolar diagnosis. Brief irritability, agitation, or activation after starting an antidepressant is insufficient. This requires careful assessment with the treating clinician.

Diagnosis involves more than recognizing a resemblance.

We need to consider plausible alternatives, identify what the evidence supports, and remain honest about what is uncertain. Sometimes that means observing the course over time and revising an earlier conclusion.

It does not mean withholding care until every question is answered.

In practice, we often work without perfect information. What we should pursue is the most defensible diagnosis: the explanation best supported by the available evidence, with uncertainty acknowledged and a willingness to reconsider as more becomes clear.

A familiar label can feel like an answer. Our responsibility is to make sure we have asked enough questions to support it.

A brief, shameless plug

If you value clear explanations of mental health that leave room for the complexity of being human, I hope you’ll subscribe to A Perceptual Shift. Free subscriptions bring these articles to your inbox. Paid subscriptions support the work and include Afterthoughts, where I explore the experiences behind my perspective.

This week’s Afterthoughts is personal. In my early twenties, while working in inpatient psychiatry, I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. I believed the diagnosis. But I had left out information that would change the picture considerably.

Below, I share what I withheld, what I did not yet understand, and how listening to other people in rehab helped me reconsider my own story.

If this work is useful to you, consider becoming a paid subscriber. And if someone came to mind while you were reading, send them this article.

Subscribe now

Share

Share A Perceptual Shift

Sources and further reading

• American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR).

• American Psychiatric Association: What Are Bipolar Disorders? and Expert Q&A.

• National Institute of Mental Health: Bipolar Disorder.

• SAMHSA: publicly accessible DSM-5 comparison tables for mania, hypomania, and major depression. These supplement, rather than replace, the DSM-5-TR.

• SAMHSA: Substance Use Disorder Treatment for People With Co-Occurring Disorders, Chapter 4.

Read more

John is just shy of ten years younger than me. I was already out of graduate school before he finished high school. Somewhere in my mind, he is still the much smaller, much younger brother I remember from years ago.

Writing my best man speech meant spending some time with that distance: the little brother I remember and the man I know today.

He is thoughtful and considerate. Slow to judge. Someone who takes other people’s feelings seriously. And now he and Stephanie are building a life together.

I wanted to say something meaningful about that. But the more I thought about their wedding, the more I found myself thinking about everything love asks us to notice.

Subscribe now

The people we have grown alongside. The people who show up. The life taking shape while we are busy getting through the week.

Weddings make room for that kind of attention. We set aside time, gather together, and acknowledge that something matters.

I wonder how much of ordinary life could benefit from the same consideration.

Including ourselves in our care

“Love yourself” is easy advice to give and sometimes very difficult advice to use.

If you are disappointed in yourself, uncomfortable in your own skin, or carrying regrets you have not figured out how to live with, the instruction can feel like another thing you are failing to do.

Care offers somewhere more practical to begin.

You can eat something nourishing while feeling frustrated with yourself. You can make an appointment you have been avoiding. You can ask for help before you feel deserving of it.

You can also take responsibility for something you have done without deciding that it tells the whole story of who you are.

For me, this is where love of self becomes useful: in the willingness to include ourselves among the people whose needs deserve consideration.

That does not mean our needs always come first. There are children to care for, responsibilities to meet, and seasons when very little time belongs entirely to us.

Still, our needs belong in the conversation.

Sometimes that means resting. Sometimes it means following through on something difficult because we care about the person who will have to live with the consequences.

We may have to practice that care for a while before we feel much affection toward ourselves.

Subscribe now

Allowing the people we love to change

There is something strange about knowing someone for most or all of their life.

You have so much history with them that it can become difficult to see what is new.

With John, part of me will probably always see my little brother. But loving him also means recognizing that he has a life, judgment, and future of his own.

I think this happens in many relationships. We remember who someone was during a difficult period. We assign them a role in the family. We become so familiar with our understanding of them that we stop asking questions.

Meanwhile, they keep living.

They develop interests we know little about. They reconsider things. They become more confident, more cautious, more open, or more certain of what they want.

Love gives us a reason to stay curious.

There is humility in asking someone we know well, “How are you thinking about this now?” There is care in listening long enough to hear an answer we did not expect.

That curiosity needs boundaries, too. Someone’s potential to change does not obligate us to remain available for mistreatment. We can care about another person and make careful decisions about the access they have to our lives.

But in relationships where there is safety and goodwill, I think we owe each other the opportunity to be known as we are becoming.

Subscribe now

Helping people belong

A wedding celebrates two people, but it also brings a wider circle into view.

Family. Friends. People from different chapters of life, gathered around a shared hope for the couple’s future.

Ordinary life needs places for that belonging as well.

A friend who remembers to check in. A neighbor who notices an absence. A familiar gathering where someone is pleased you came.

Love of community can begin with taking an interest in what happens to the people around us.

We can learn a name. Extend an invitation. Support a local effort. Follow up after the initial conversation about how someone is doing.

And we can allow ourselves to receive that attention.

That last part can be uncomfortable, especially when we are accustomed to being useful. Giving help provides a role we understand. Receiving it asks us to let someone see a need we may prefer to keep private.

A community has to make room for both.

Of course, belonging is not equally available to everyone. Some people have been excluded from the very places that promised to welcome them. Others are starting over after a move, a loss, or a major change in their lives.

That makes the small decisions about who gets invited, noticed, and included worth taking seriously.

The days after the celebration

I am happy for John and Stephanie. Proud of my brother. Grateful to celebrate the life they are beginning together.

And I keep thinking about the ordinary days ahead of them.

The conversations after work. The plans that change. The small kindnesses that may never become a story anyone tells at a wedding.

So much of love will happen there.

The same is true of our care for ourselves, our friendships, our communities, and the activities we value. They need some place in the lives we are actually living.

We will not attend to all of them equally every week. There will be periods of grief, fatigue, and obligation when our capacity is limited. Love can remain meaningful through those periods, even when expressing it becomes harder.

But when we do have some room to choose, it is worth asking where our attention goes.

What do you love, and where could you give it a little more of your attention this week?

Subscribe now

Making room for what we love

The Japanese concept of ikigai offers a useful connection here. Broadly, it concerns what gives life a sense of value and makes it feel worth living.

I think about that when I consider the activities we love.

Cooking something for people who will enjoy it. Working in a garden. Learning a difficult piece of music. Teaching. Writing. Making something with our hands.

For some people, meaningful work provides this feeling. For others, it happens outside the hours that pay the bills.

There can be a particular disappointment in loving something and then feeling pressure to turn it into a business, an accomplishment, or evidence that we are using our time well.

An activity can deserve a place in our lives because we enjoy doing it.

That may sound obvious. But look at a crowded calendar and notice how easily enjoyment becomes the thing that can wait.

There are real constraints here. Time, money, health, and caregiving responsibilities shape what is possible. Advice to “do what you love” can sound careless when someone is struggling to meet basic needs.

A more useful question might be: What do I miss doing, and is there a manageable way to return to it?

Perhaps there is room for twenty minutes. Perhaps there is a less expensive version, a shared version, or a version that fits the life we have now.

We deserve opportunities to experience our lives as something we are participating in with interest.

A shameless plug

Writing A Perceptual Shift is one of the ways I make room for something I love: thinking carefully about how we live and sharing ideas that might help.

If this piece brought someone to mind, consider sending it their way. And if you value this work, subscribing or becoming a paid subscriber helps me continue making room for it.

Thank you for giving it some of your attention.

One idea deserves a little more attention before I close. The Japanese concept of ikigai offers another way to think about the people, activities, and commitments that give our lives meaning. It also reaches beyond relationships to a question we can easily neglect: what do we love doing?

Epilogue: What Makes Life Worth Living

There is a Japanese concept that connects with much of what I have been describing: ikigai.

It is often translated as “a reason for living” or “what makes life worth living.” No single English phrase captures it completely, but the central idea concerns the people, activities, and commitments through which we experience life as meaningful and worth participating in.

You may have encountered ikigai through a diagram of four overlapping circles: what you love, what you are good at, what the world needs, and what you can be paid for.

Those questions can be useful, particularly when thinking about work. But the diagram is a modern Western adaptation. In 2014, Marc Winn combined an existing purpose diagram with the word ikigai. He has since acknowledged that the Japanese concept is broader than the career framework his image helped popularize.

The distinction matters. If we understand ikigai only as the intersection of passion, talent, usefulness, and income, we can come away believing that a meaningful life depends on finding one occupation that satisfies all four.

Ikigai leaves room for meaning in ordinary life: caring for a garden, spending time with a grandchild, or having something to look forward to in the morning. Payment is not a requirement.

It also has a relational dimension. Research discussing ikigai describes the importance of social participation and contributing to others. Meaning can emerge through the experience of having something to offer and someone with whom to share it.

That is where I see its connection to love.

The forms of love explored in this article are my own way of approaching the subject. Caring for ourselves helps us remain participants in our lives. Loving others gives us people whose lives matter to us. Community offers opportunities to belong and contribute. Activities we love give us experiences we want to return to.

These sources of meaning can coexist. We do not have to ask one relationship, one job, or one passion to carry the entire weight of making life worthwhile.

I find that reassuring.

There are seasons when work feels empty, when relationships change, or when something we once enjoyed becomes unavailable to us. During those periods, it may help to notice the other places where meaning remains, or where it might begin to grow.

For me, the useful question is this:

Which people, activities, and commitments make my life feel worth participating in, and how am I making room for them?

After a weekend spent celebrating my brother and the person he loves, that feels like a question worth bringing home.

Recognizing what matters to us is a beginning. Giving it a place in an already crowded life takes some working out.

That is what the Afterthoughts are for. Alongside more personal reflections, I use this space to help paid subscribers put the ideas explored here into practice through concrete steps, useful questions, and exercises.

This week, we’ll work through choosing one area of your life that needs attention, turning that intention into a specific action, and making a plan that can adapt when the week gets complicated.

If you would like help moving from “this matters to me” to “here is how I’ll make room for it,” join me below.

Read more

I don’t particularly consider myself old, although I suppose that depends on who you ask. And while I’d like to believe I have just as much energy today as I did ten or fifteen years ago, there are certainly occasions when I’m reminded that isn’t entirely true.

There are mornings when getting out of bed requires a little more convincing. Evenings when doing something productive seems considerably less appealing than sitting down and doing absolutely nothing. And days when the list of things I’d like to accomplish exceeds the energy I have available.

But I’ve noticed something interesting over the years.

The less I do, the less I seem capable of doing. Conversely, the more consistently I engage in certain activities, the easier those activities become.

It has led me to reconsider something we often take for granted:

What if energy isn’t always something we need before we act? What if, in many circumstances, our capacity to act is something we develop through acting?

I’m not suggesting that energy can be manufactured out of thin air or that exhaustion can simply be overcome through determination. Rather, our current capacity isn’t necessarily representative of what we’re capable of developing.

When I talk about creating energy, I’m really talking about developing the physical, intellectual, and emotional capacity to engage in activities that might otherwise feel beyond our reach.

The Problem With Waiting

How often have you found yourself saying something along the lines of:

“I’ll start exercising when I have more energy.”

“I’d like to read more, but I’m always too tired.”

“I’ll get around to it when things settle down.”

These statements aren’t necessarily excuses. In many cases, they accurately describe how we feel. But they also reveal an assumption that energy must precede activity.

Consider someone who hasn’t exercised regularly in several years. Even a relatively short walk might leave them exhausted.

Now imagine that person begins walking for ten minutes each day.

Nothing particularly impressive. No elaborate workout routine. No dramatic transformation.

Just ten minutes.

Over time, those ten minutes become easier. Eventually, fifteen minutes might seem reasonable. Then twenty. Perhaps they begin walking faster or incorporating other forms of exercise.

They haven’t discovered some hidden reservoir of energy. They’ve developed the capacity to engage in an activity that previously exceeded their conditioning.

Similar principles apply to intellectual endeavors.

Someone who hasn’t read regularly in years may struggle to concentrate for fifteen minutes. Someone who rarely writes may find producing a single page exhausting.

Through repeated, manageable engagement, these activities can become more familiar and less demanding. Attention may improve, confidence develops, and the effort required to begin can decrease.

The same principle can extend into our emotional lives.

Someone who struggles with difficult conversations may avoid them because of the anxiety they produce. Avoidance provides immediate relief, but it also limits opportunities to develop the confidence and emotional tolerance necessary to navigate similar situations.

This is part of what makes behavioral activation and gradual exposure useful therapeutic interventions.

There’s another aspect of this worth considering.

Sometimes the energy we expend avoiding an activity exceeds the energy required to actually perform it.

Think about someone who spends three days worrying about a difficult conversation that ultimately lasts fifteen minutes. Or someone who spends an entire afternoon thinking about a task they’ve been avoiding, only to complete it in twenty minutes.

The anticipation becomes its own exhausting activity.

Of course, beginning doesn’t guarantee that the discomfort disappears. Some things really are difficult, and some conversations are every bit as unpleasant as we anticipate.

But I wonder how often we exhaust ourselves rehearsing an experience that might become more manageable if we simply allowed ourselves to engage with it.

Sometimes the energy we’re looking for is already being consumed by our resistance to beginning.

We don’t always need to feel motivated, confident, or comfortable before taking action. Sometimes those experiences develop through the process of acting.

Sometimes what we interpret as a lack of energy is actually a lack of conditioning, familiarity, confidence, or direction.

And those are things we may be able to change.

Energy Is Already Being Spent

Avoidance isn’t the only way we expend energy without necessarily recognizing it.

Our routines, habits, and everyday decisions also determine where much of our attention and effort goes.

Think about how you spend an ordinary day.

Where does your attention go? What occupies your thoughts? Which activities receive your time? What responsibilities consume the greatest amount of emotional effort?

Consider someone who says they don’t have the energy to read for twenty minutes but routinely spends an hour scrolling through social media.

Now, these activities don’t require the same amount of effort. Scrolling can be relatively passive, while reading demands sustained attention.

Nevertheless, the comparison raises an interesting question.

Is the problem always that we don’t have enough energy, or is it sometimes that we’re directing our existing energy toward activities that don’t produce the outcomes we want?

This is where I find systems theory particularly useful.

Our behaviors don’t exist independently of the environments in which they occur. They’re influenced by routines, relationships, responsibilities, expectations, and the ways we’ve organized our lives.

Someone who wants to exercise after work may find that their existing evening routine makes doing so unnecessarily difficult.

Perhaps they arrive home, sit down, and gradually settle into the familiar activities of the evening.

The environment supports the behavior. The behavior reinforces the routine. And the routine becomes part of the system.

Changing that system doesn’t necessarily require a dramatic intervention.

Perhaps the person packs their gym bag the night before and goes directly from work.

The environment hasn’t eliminated the effort required to exercise. But it has reduced some of the friction involved in getting started.

We can also build upon existing strengths.

If you’re capable of spending hours concentrating on a hobby, perhaps it’s worth examining what makes that activity engaging and whether some of those conditions can be recreated elsewhere.

If you’re consistent about meeting professional obligations but struggle with personal commitments, perhaps some of the structure that works professionally could be applied to your personal life.

Rather than treating every desired change as something that must be developed from nothing, we can examine what we’re already doing successfully.

And build from there.

Building What We Want to Sustain

So how do we put this into practice?

Start by identifying something you’d like to do more consistently.

Be specific.

“I want to be healthier” is a reasonable aspiration, but it doesn’t tell us much about what needs to happen.

“I want to walk for fifteen minutes after dinner three evenings each week” gives us something considerably more useful.

Next, identify the actions necessary to accomplish that goal and determine when and where they’re most likely to occur.

An intention that isn’t connected to a specific opportunity for action is remarkably easy to postpone.

Once you’ve established a starting point, pay attention to what happens.

How long did you engage in the activity? How difficult was it? What made getting started easier? What got in the way?

And perhaps most importantly, was the amount of effort manageable enough that you’d be willing to repeat it?

We have a tendency to become enthusiastic about change and immediately attempt more than we’re prepared to sustain.

Someone decides to begin exercising and spends two hours at the gym. Someone wants to become more productive and creates an elaborate schedule accounting for practically every minute of the day.

Then life happens.

Something interrupts the routine, a day gets missed, and suddenly the entire endeavor feels like another obligation they’ve failed to maintain.

The objective is to establish a level of engagement we can repeat, sustain, and gradually expand.

There’s nothing particularly glamorous about this process.

In fact, it’s often quite boring.

But meaningful change frequently is.

It’s repetition, adjustment, consistency, and recovery.

Sometimes the most meaningful evidence of progress is simply recognizing that something which once required considerable effort now requires a little less.

The Difference Between Being Tired and Being Finished

Not every experience of fatigue is an opportunity for self-improvement.

Sometimes we’re exhausted because we haven’t slept enough, we’re managing significant responsibilities, or we’re experiencing physical or psychological conditions that genuinely limit our capacity.

And sometimes the most productive thing we can do is rest.

Recovery is an essential component of developing sustainable capacity, and there’s no virtue in ignoring legitimate needs simply because we’ve convinced ourselves we should be capable of doing more.

But there’s a meaningful difference between recognizing a need for rest and concluding that our current limitations are permanent.

As I’ve gotten older, I’ve become increasingly interested in that distinction.

I’m less interested in measuring myself against who I used to be and more interested in understanding what I’m still capable of becoming.

I don’t need to have the same energy I had twenty years ago.

I need to be thoughtful about how I’m using the energy I have today and intentional about developing the capacity I’ll need tomorrow.

Perhaps that’s the perceptual shift.

Maybe the question isn’t whether we have enough energy to do the things we want to do.

Maybe the better question is whether we’re willing to begin developing the energy those things require.

Because sometimes we don’t find the energy to begin. We begin, and discover that energy follows.

A Shameless Plug

If you’ve enjoyed this article, I hope you’ll consider subscribing to A Perceptual Shift.

I write about mental health, behavior, relationships, and the often uncomfortable process of trying to live a little more intentionally. My goal isn’t to tell people how they should live. It’s to offer perspectives that might help them reconsider how they’re already living.

Free subscribers receive my public articles. Paid subscribers also receive my Afterthoughts, where I share more personal reflections about the experiences, contradictions, and occasional frustrations that inform my writing.

Your support helps me continue doing this work independently.

And if you’re interested in my counseling services, clinical supervision, or practical guides, you can find them at www.aperceptualshift.com.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Epilogue: Borrowed Energy

Of course, there are other ways we attempt to create energy.

Some are considerably easier than others.

Coffee. Energy drinks. Caffeine supplements. Stimulants. An entire marketplace of products designed to help us feel more awake, alert, productive, and capable of doing whatever we believe needs to be done.

And to be fair, many of them work.

I drink a couple of cups of coffee most mornings. As I sit here writing this, there’s a Diet Coke beside me. I’m hardly in a position to lecture anyone about their caffeine consumption, nor would I particularly want to.

But I think there’s an important distinction worth making.

Feeling more energetic and developing a greater capacity for sustained activity are not necessarily the same thing.

Caffeine can improve alertness and concentration. In reasonable amounts, it can be part of an otherwise healthy lifestyle.

But it doesn’t eliminate our underlying need for sleep, recovery, or physical conditioning.

If I’m consistently exhausted because I’m sleeping four hours a night, another cup of coffee might help me get through the afternoon. It doesn’t resolve the reason I’m exhausted.

And that’s where I think we occasionally confuse getting through something with addressing what’s making it difficult.

Prescribed medications can play an important and entirely appropriate role in managing medical conditions. That’s a different consideration from routinely using caffeine to push through fatigue.

With caffeine, I think it’s worth asking whether we’re using it to complement an otherwise sustainable routine or increasingly relying upon it to compensate for one that isn’t.

Sometimes our circumstances genuinely demand more than we comfortably have available. There’s nothing inherently wrong with needing some assistance getting through the day.

But there’s also value in recognizing when our efforts to feel more energetic are distracting us from the circumstances contributing to our fatigue.

Because there’s a difference between finding something that helps us get through today and building something that makes tomorrow a little easier.

A Little More Personal...

I’ve just spent an entire article explaining how we can develop energy, increase our capacity, and become more intentional about how we spend our time.

And I believe every word of it.

But understanding something intellectually and accepting it personally are two very different experiences.

There’s an uncomfortable contradiction in my own life that this article doesn’t entirely address.

And if I’m being particularly candid, it’s something that occasionally scares the hell out of me.

For paid subscribers, I’d like to share what that experience looks like, and why I’ve found it considerably more difficult to accept than I ever expected.

Read more

“I can’t keep doing this every weekend.”

You had rehearsed the conversation. You knew why something needed to change. You had looked at your calendar, your energy, and the things you kept postponing. The decision made sense.

Then the other person gets quiet.

Or disappointed.

Or says, “I thought I could count on you.”

Within minutes, you are considering an exception. By the end of the evening, you are drafting a message that gives back most of what you just asked for.

The responsibility was exhausting you. Now the guilt is exhausting you. At least you knew how to handle the responsibility.

In “You’re Handling It. But What Is It Costing You?”, I explored what happens when getting everything done becomes our primary measure of whether we are okay. Recognizing that cost matters. The next question is what happens when we actually change something.

Because saying no is a sentence. Living with the response is a practice.

Before you reverse a decision, ask yourself:

Has something changed about what I can reasonably offer, or am I trying to make the discomfort stop?

Both deserve attention. They may call for different responses.

This special companion for paid subscribers walks through a fictional example, language you can adapt, and a small exercise for holding a reasonable limit without abandoning the people you care about.

Read more

“Fine.”

You went to work. You handled what needed handling. You answered the messages, made the decisions, and remembered the thing everyone else forgot. Nothing happened that seems important enough to explain.

But you have nothing left for a conversation.

Dinner still needs to happen. Someone needs help with something. There is a question about tomorrow. You respond more sharply than you intended, then feel guilty because the question was reasonable.

Later, you sit down and reach for your phone. You are too tired to do anything you would actually enjoy, but you keep scrolling past the time you meant to go to bed.

Tomorrow, you will get up and do it again.

From the outside, you are managing. You might tell yourself the same thing.

After all, everything is getting done.

What “fine” leaves out

Being able to meet your responsibilities matters. Work provides income. Children need care. Relationships require effort. There are obligations you cannot simply set aside because you are tired.

But whether you completed those obligations tells you only part of what you need to know.

It does not tell you how much effort they required. It does not tell you what you sacrificed to meet them, how long it took to recover, or whether you had anything left for the parts of life that make the responsibilities worth carrying.

Two people can finish the same workday and have very different experiences. One goes home with enough energy to enjoy the evening. The other spends the evening recovering from the effort of appearing composed.

Both showed up. Both did the work.

If completion is the only thing we measure, we miss the difference.

You might be missing it in yourself.

Where the cost shows up

Sometimes the cost is obvious. You are sleeping less. You keep getting headaches. You have stopped exercising or eating regularly because those things are the easiest to move when something else needs attention.

Sometimes it shows up in how you relate to other people.

You love your family, but their ordinary needs feel like additional demands. You want to see your friends, but arranging it requires energy you cannot find. You stop answering because you do not know how to explain that even a pleasant conversation feels like work.

Sometimes the cost is harder to name.

You have time off, but spend it thinking about what you should be doing. You complete one task and immediately look for the next. Something good happens, and you barely register it before returning to what remains unfinished.

Your life still contains things you care about. Your ability to experience them has become smaller.

None of these experiences, by itself, tells you exactly what is happening. They do give you something worth examining.

Ask yourself: What keeps getting postponed so I can maintain the appearance that nothing needs to change?

How carrying more becomes normal

You did not necessarily choose this arrangement all at once.

Perhaps you took on something extra during a difficult month. You stayed later because someone left. You became the person who handled a family problem because you were available, capable, or both.

The adjustment made sense at the time.

Then the difficult month ended, but the responsibility stayed. The position remained vacant. People kept coming to you. What began as an exception became the expectation.

You adapted.

Adaptation can be useful. It can also make it harder to notice when the demands have grown beyond what you can reasonably sustain. You become familiar with being tired. You stop expecting an evening to feel restful. You explain away the irritability because everyone has a lot going on.

Eventually, “This is a difficult period” becomes “This is just my life.”

That conclusion deserves a closer look.

Some seasons really are demanding. Parenting, illness, grief, financial strain, and caring for another person can require more than you would freely choose to give. The issue is whether you have any opportunity to recover, any support, and any room to acknowledge what the situation is taking from you.

A difficult season becomes harder to navigate when you must also pretend it costs you nothing.

When your standard becomes “I haven’t fallen apart”

If you are accustomed to being dependable, you may have a high threshold for deciding you need help.

You can still work. You can still get out of bed. Other people have bigger problems. You have made it through worse.

Each statement may be true.

Together, they can become a reason to ignore almost anything short of collapse.

You begin treating your ability to continue as evidence that continuing this way is acceptable. Yet being capable of something does not tell you how long you can sustain it, or what you will have to give up along the way.

Consider a broader set of questions:

Can I recover between periods of effort?

Do I have room to enjoy anything?

Can I respond to a small inconvenience without feeling pushed past my limit?

Are the people closest to me getting some part of me beyond what is left over?

These questions can help you recognize a problem while there is still room to make a deliberate change.

Take an honest look at one ordinary week

Start with the week you actually lived.

Look at where your time and energy went. Include the effort other people might never see: preparing for conversations, keeping track of appointments, anticipating needs, resolving problems, and worrying about what you might have missed.

Then look at what received whatever remained.

Sleep. Meals. Movement. Friendship. Time with your spouse. Quiet. Something you enjoy without needing to accomplish anything.

You do not need to create an ideal schedule or assign yourself another project. Identify one repeated tradeoff.

“I stay up late because it is the only time that feels like mine.”

“I keep skipping lunch because I am afraid to fall behind.”

“I spend Saturday recovering, then feel guilty for wasting it.”

“I say yes before checking whether I have room.”

A specific pattern gives you something to work with. “My whole life is too much” may describe how it feels, but it is difficult to act on all at once.

What is one arrangement that keeps leaving you depleted?

Make one change you can actually name

The next step will depend on the arrangement.

You may need to ask for help with a responsibility. You may need to revisit an agreement that made sense six months ago. You may need to clarify what is expected, stop volunteering for an additional task, or protect time you have repeatedly surrendered.

Make the change specific enough that someone could tell whether it happened.

“I need a better work-life balance” becomes, “I need us to decide which task moves when another urgent request is added.”

“I need help at home” becomes, “Can you take responsibility for dinner on these two nights, including deciding what we are having?”

“I need to rest” becomes, “I am leaving Sunday morning unscheduled.”

Specificity does not guarantee that another person will agree. It makes the request clear and helps reveal what options are available.

Some pressures will require more than a conversation or a new habit. Financial insecurity, inadequate staffing, illness, and caregiving demands may call for resources, advocacy, or substantial changes. You are allowed to recognize those realities without deciding that your difficulty managing them is a personal failure.

Begin with what is within reach. Be honest about what requires help.

Expect the change to feel unfamiliar

A reasonable change may still produce guilt.

You may worry that someone will be disappointed, that a task will be done differently, or that asking for help will alter how people see you.

Other people may need time to adjust. Some may resist an arrangement that previously worked well for them.

Look at what actually happens.

Does an important need go unmet? Is there a problem you need to address? Does someone simply prefer the old arrangement? Are you feeling guilty because you have done something wrong, or because you are doing something differently?

You can remain responsible while reconsidering how much responsibility belongs to you.

You can ask for help before the breaking point

You do not need to wait until you cannot perform your life to talk about how difficult performing it has become.

You can bring this into therapy. You can raise it with someone you trust. You can ask for practical support while you are still capable of carrying the responsibility yourself.

Try saying it plainly:

“I’m getting things done, but it is taking more out of me than I want to admit.”

That is enough to begin.

You may decide that some sacrifices are worth making. People willingly give a great deal for things they love. An honest assessment makes that choice clearer. It also allows you to recognize when the sacrifice has expanded beyond what you intended.

At the end of another completed day, look beyond what you managed to finish.

What did it take to get through?

What did you have left?

Your answers belong in the assessment of how you are doing.

Epilogue: Addition by Subtraction

Most of us know how to add responsibilities to our lives. We work, build families, establish routines, and show up for the people and activities that matter to us. Many of these additions are things we wanted.

We get less practice deciding what to remove.

A commitment can be worthwhile and still exceed what we have left to give it. An expectation can make sense when we accept it and become unsustainable as our circumstances change. Sometimes growth requires us to reconsider what we have been carrying.

Addition by subtraction can feel unnatural when we have learned to measure progress by how much more we can handle. But letting something go can restore patience, time, and the space to make a change we have been postponing. It can give the people we love more of our attention than whatever remains at the end of the day.

I have written before about systems theory and the resistance that often follows change. When we change our role, other people may have to adjust theirs. A reasonable boundary can disrupt an arrangement everyone has grown accustomed to.

That discomfort deserves consideration. It does not automatically mean we have made the wrong decision. Sometimes we have to tolerate the adjustment long enough to discover whether the new arrangement serves us better.

I have been learning this through A Perceptual Shift.

It began with an idea: create another pathway to services I believed were difficult to access or did not always meet people’s needs. I started writing on Substack and building a counseling and supervision practice. Consultations, a podcast, and book reviews followed.

Each addition brought possibilities I was excited to pursue. Each also required attention I had to take from somewhere else.

Some of that expansion has been necessary as I work toward a business that can sustain itself. Still, an opportunity’s potential does not erase its cost.

I have had less time for guitar and the gym. More painfully, I have had less time with people I love. Some sacrifices were deliberate. Others accumulated while I was looking ahead to the next thing.

It is difficult to acknowledge that something I care deeply about building can take me away from people I care deeply about being with.

That is where the question becomes personal. Which parts of this work deserve the time they require? Which can wait? What am I calling necessary because I am afraid to let it go?

I am still figuring that out. I want to share the choices honestly enough that someone else might recognize a tradeoff in their own life before it becomes familiar enough to go unquestioned.

I want A Perceptual Shift to grow. I want it to provide useful services, support my family, and become something I am proud to have built.

I also want to remain present for the life I am building it for.

A Shameless Plug

If you recognized yourself in this article, you can bring that recognition into a conversation. You do not need to wait until you stop functioning to ask for help with what functioning is costing you.

Through A Perceptual Shift, I offer online therapy for adults in Pennsylvania. Together, we can look at what you are carrying, the expectations keeping it in place, and the changes that would give you more room to live.

Learn more about working with me. Evening and weekend consultation times are available; ongoing appointment availability is discussed separately.

And if you would like to support this writing, consider becoming a paid subscriber. The afterthoughts behind the paywall below explore how my own recovery complicates the question of what to give, what to keep, and what to let go.

Read more

Sometimes the most useful question is smaller: What needs my attention first?

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs offers a way to organize that question. You may have seen it drawn as a pyramid: physical needs at the bottom, followed by safety, connection, esteem, and the pursuit of meaning or potential. Real life is less orderly than a pyramid. You can be well fed and lonely, financially secure and frightened, loved and exhausted. There is no requirement to complete one level before you can care about another.

But when stress makes it hard to think, the framework can help you look for an unmet need and choose one response. Start wherever something is asking for attention. Come back to the other parts later.

First, check the body

Before trying to reason your way out of anxiety, take an honest inventory. When did you last eat something? Have you had water? How much have you slept? Are you too hot or cold? Do you need to use the bathroom, shower, change your clothes, or step away from noise? Have you been sitting still for hours?

These questions can sound almost insulting when the problem feels complicated. They are not an argument that hunger caused the problem. They are a way to stop asking an underfed, overstimulated, exhausted body to carry the problem without help.

Choose one concrete correction. Eat what is available. Drink some water. Put on clean clothes. Open a window or go outside for a few minutes. Rest if you can. Then check in again. If the worry remains, you have still made yourself better equipped to address it.

If your symptoms are new, severe, or physically concerning, do not assume they are anxiety. Seek appropriate medical care.

Next, ask what is actually unsafe

Anxiety often speaks in the language of danger. Sometimes it is pointing to a real problem. Sometimes it is forecasting one. The response depends on which you are facing.

Ask: Is there a threat I need to act on now, a problem I can plan for, or an uncertainty I cannot settle today?

If something is immediately unsafe, move toward safety and get help. If rent is due, work feels unstable, a medical appointment needs making, or a relationship needs an honest conversation, name the specific problem. Then identify the next step that is within reach: check the account balance, make the call, gather the paperwork, ask for support, schedule the conversation. A useful step does not have to solve the entire situation.

Some forms of security cannot be guaranteed. You may not know whether you will get the job, how a test will turn out, or what another person will decide. In those moments, look for the parts of your life that are dependable. Where can you go? Who can you call? What routines, resources, skills, or past experiences can you rely on while the outcome remains unknown? Feeling safe is not the same as being able to promise yourself that nothing will go wrong.

If you keep returning to a question you cannot answer, write down what you know, what you can do, and when you will revisit it. Give the problem a place in your calendar instead of letting it occupy every minute.

Then, look for connection

Stress can make people disappear into themselves. You may cancel plans, stop replying, or decide that reaching out would burden someone. Isolation can leave you alone with the loudest version of your thoughts.

Ask: Do I need help, company, perspective, or simply to be known by someone right now?

Those are different requests, and naming one makes it easier for another person to respond.

You could say, “I’m anxious and I don’t need you to fix it. Can you sit with me for a few minutes?” Or, “Could you help me think through one practical next step?” If the first person is unavailable, that does not mean connection is unavailable. Try another trusted person, a familiar community, or a professional who can help you carry what has become too much to carry alone.

Connection can also require a boundary. If a conversation reliably leaves you more distressed, you are allowed to pause it and return when you can participate more safely.

Notice what the anxiety is saying about you

Once you have checked your body, your circumstances, and your support, listen to the judgment hiding inside the worry. Does a missed deadline mean you are a failure? Does an awkward conversation mean nobody respects you? Have you turned a difficult event into a verdict about your worth?

Try separating three things on paper: what happened, what I am telling myself it means, and what I need to do next.

For example: “I made a mistake at work” is an event. “I am incompetent and will lose my job” is an interpretation and a prediction. “I need to correct the error and tell the right person” is an action. You do not have to invent a cheerful story. You need a description accurate enough to let you respond.

If your confidence has taken a hit, choose a task small enough to finish. Return the call. Wash the dishes. Correct one line. Keep one promise to yourself. Confidence often grows from evidence of action, including imperfect action, more readily than from an attempt to feel confident first.

Finally, ask what matters beyond relief

The top of the pyramid is often described as self-actualization: living in a way that expresses your abilities, values, and sense of purpose. That can sound distant when you are anxious. It need not be grand.

Ask: If I did not have to eliminate this feeling before moving, what small action would fit the person I want to be?

It might be telling the truth, showing up for someone, making something, learning, praying, taking a walk, or doing work you care about for fifteen minutes.

Some anxiety eases when its source is addressed. Some remains while you do the next meaningful thing. You do not have to earn your way to meaning by first becoming calm.

A place to begin when you come back to this

If reading the whole article feels like too much, use these questions:

1. Body: What does my body need in the next ten minutes?

2. Safety: Is there something unsafe now, one practical problem to act on, or uncertainty to revisit later?

3. Connection: Who could offer the kind of support I actually need?

4. Self-respect: What happened, what story am I adding, and what action is mine to take?

5. Meaning: What small choice would still matter if the anxiety stayed for a while?

You do not need five answers. Find the first question that gives you a usable next step. Take it, and reassess.

Anxiety may be giving you information. It may also be giving every concern the same volume. Your job is not to obey the volume. Your job is to find what needs care, what needs action, what needs company, and what can wait.

If anxiety repeatedly disrupts your sleep, work, relationships, or ability to function, consider talking with a mental health professional. You do not have to wait until you are in crisis to ask for help.

A Shameless Plug

If you have worked through these questions and keep finding yourself back in the same anxious place, you do not have to figure it out by yourself. At A Perceptual Shift, I offer online therapy for adults in Pennsylvania. We can look at what is happening in your life, what your anxiety is asking of you, and the patterns that make it harder to respond the way you want to.

If you are ready to talk, learn more about working with me here. And if you are not ready, keep this article. You can come back to it whenever you need a place to begin.

The questions above can help you find what needs care or action. But sometimes you meet those needs, make a plan, and still feel anxious. At that point, it may help to look at the story your mind is telling about what happened. That is where cognitive behavioral therapy offers another useful question: Is my interpretation the only possible one?

Leave a comment

Epilogue: What if the story is making it worse?

There is one more place to look when anxiety persists, even after you have addressed what you can: the meaning you have assigned to what happened.

This is a central idea in cognitive behavioral therapy. An event occurs, and your mind interprets it, often so quickly that the interpretation feels like part of the event. Someone does not reply to your message. You think, I said something wrong. Your chest tightens. You send another message to explain yourself, or you withdraw before they can reject you.

The unanswered message is real. The explanation for it is still unknown. Anxiety can make one possible explanation feel like the only one.

To reality test an anxious thought, begin by writing a sentence about the situation using only what you could observe: “I sent a message yesterday and have not received a reply.” Then write the interpretation separately: “They are upset with me because I am too much.” Notice that the second sentence makes a claim about someone else’s mind and about your worth. Neither claim is established by the first.

Next, ask yourself:

• What evidence supports my interpretation? What evidence points elsewhere?

• What else could explain what happened?

• If the outcome I fear occurs, what could I do then?

• Am I treating a possibility as a certainty, or one event as a verdict on who I am?

The goal is not to replace every painful thought with a pleasant one. You might arrive at: “I do not know why they have not answered. They may be busy, or they may be upset. I can wait until tomorrow, then ask directly if I still need to know.” That thought leaves room for uncertainty and gives you a choice.

Sometimes reality testing confirms a problem. Perhaps you did make a mistake, or someone really is angry. The exercise still matters. It can help you respond to that problem instead of responding to every feared consequence at once. You can acknowledge a mistake without deciding you are a failure. You can hear that someone is upset without concluding that you are unlovable.

That is the perceptual shift: seeing the circumstance as accurately as you can, while refusing to turn an uncertain moment into a fixed story about yourself. Relief may follow. Even when it does not, you have a clearer place from which to act.

If you found something useful here, I’d ask you to consider becoming a paid subscriber. For $5 a month, less than the cost of a cup of coffee in most places, you’ll have access to everything I write, including the Afterthoughts that follow many of these articles. More importantly, your subscription directly supports A Perceptual Shift and allows me to continue making the time to write, think, and share this work with you. If you’ve been reading for a while and have considered supporting what I’m building here, I’d be incredibly grateful to have you along for the journey.

Subscribe now

Read more

He is just shy of ten years younger than I am, and it was beautiful to watch him surrounded by the core group of friends who came to celebrate such an important moment in his life.

There was history between them. You could feel it in the jokes that did not need to be explained, the stories everyone had heard before but still wanted to hear again, and the particular way people speak to one another when they have known each other long enough to remember earlier versions of who they were.

Watching them made me happy.

It also made me think about my own friends.

I thought about the people who knew me before I was a husband, a father, a clinician, or a business owner. Some of them remain active parts of my life. Others are people I may not have spoken with in months or even years, despite the fact that I still genuinely love them.

That is a strange reality to confront.

Men do not necessarily stop loving their friends as they get older. Sometimes, we simply stop seeing them.

When Friendship Stops Being Automatic

When we are young, friendship is built into the structure of life.

We attend school together. We live near one another. We play on the same teams, work the same jobs, or spend our weekends in the same places. We do not have to make much room for friendship because the room already exists.

Then life changes.

We build careers. We get married. We have children. We accept responsibilities that earlier versions of us may not have been prepared to carry.

Our priorities change because they should change.

My family is not an obstacle standing between me and my social life. My wife and son are my family. They deserve my time, attention, and presence.

But one consequence of building a family is that life naturally becomes more insulated. The week fills with work, dinner, bedtime, appointments, errands, and the ordinary exhaustion that comes with trying to remain available to the people who depend on us.

So we tell ourselves that we will call next week.

Next week becomes next month. Months become years.

Nobody consciously decided that the friendship no longer mattered. Life simply continued moving, and the friendship was not deliberately carried forward with it.

That is how many adult friendships fade. Not through rejection, but through the assumption that there will be more time later.

Connected From a Distance

Technology has changed what it means to lose touch with someone.

We can go years without sitting across from a friend while still knowing that they got married, changed jobs, or celebrated another birthday with their children.

We can send something that made us laugh or reminded us of them rather than tell them directly that we were thinking about them.

Those gestures matter. Sometimes that is how we tell someone, “You are still part of my internal world,” without having to use those words.

Technology preserves a thread between people who might otherwise lose each other completely. That is a gift.

But the thread can also be mistaken for the relationship itself.

Seeing someone’s updates can create the feeling that we are still involved in their life. We may know what they posted without knowing how they are.

That may be one of the stranger contradictions of modern friendship: we are more informed about one another’s lives while becoming less present within them.

Maintaining Conscious Contact

There is a phrase from recovery that I keep coming back to: “maintaining conscious contact.”

I first heard it in AA and NA, where it referred to our relationship with a Higher Power. For me, that is God.

The old-timers taught me that believing in God was not the same as staying connected to Him. Connection required something from me. Prayer. Listening. Willingness.

I could not turn to God only when life became difficult and expect that relationship to remain strong. Friendship is not the same, but it shares something simple with faith: both can matter deeply to me while receiving very little of my attention.

Adult friendship does not need to look the way it did when we were younger. I do not need to see every friend every week, and at this stage of life, that would not be realistic for any of us.

But friendship still requires some form of participation.

Maintaining conscious contact means staying reachable. It means moving beyond “We should get together sometime” and putting a date on the calendar.

It means asking the second question.

Not only, “How have you been?”

But, “No, really. How have you been?”

It means allowing a friend to know when I am struggling instead of waiting until I have solved the problem. Sometimes it means saying, “I miss you,” when sending another joke would feel easier.

A friendship may survive years of limited contact, but survival is not the same thing as participation.

Friendship does not need unlimited access to remain real. But it needs some place in the lives we are living now.

Because if we are no longer showing up in each other’s lives, eventually we have to ask whether we are maintaining the friendship or only our memory of it.

Maybe someone came to mind while you were reading this.

You do not need the perfect words.

You may only need to say:

“I was thinking about you. It has been too long. Let’s put something on the calendar.”

Then choose a date.

Throughout this article, I use the word sober to describe abstinence from both alcohol and other drugs. I recognize that sober and clean are not completely synonymous and that people in recovery may prefer one term over the other. For the sake of clarity and flow, I use sober more broadly throughout this article to refer to abstinence from intoxicating substances.

There is an old term in recovery circles for someone who stops drinking but continues living with many of the same attitudes, behaviors, and emotional patterns they had while drinking.

A dry drunk.

I’ve never particularly liked the term.

It’s usually not meant as a compliment.

Someone gets sober but they’re still angry.

Still resentful.

Still selfish.

Still blaming everyone else.

Still miserable to live with.

So somebody eventually says they’re a dry drunk.

Maybe they’re right.

But I’ve always thought there was something missing from that explanation.

Because if someone spent years using alcohol or drugs to manage their experience of life, why would we expect removing the substance to automatically change everything else?

You stopped drinking.

But what did you start doing instead?

Abstinence Is an Enormous Change

I don’t want to minimize what it means to stop drinking or using drugs.

For someone with an addiction, abstinence can require an extraordinary amount of effort.

Sometimes it requires detoxification.

Treatment.

Medication.

Meetings.

Therapy.

Recovery houses.

Damaged relationships.

Financial consequences.

Entire social circles disappearing overnight.

Sometimes getting sober means dismantling almost everything familiar about your life while simultaneously trying to function without the thing you previously used to tolerate it.

That’s not small.

But abstinence is still primarily about removing something.

You stop drinking.

You stop using.

And then something interesting tends to happen.

You start trying to get your life back.

You go back to work.

You start going to the gym again.

You spend more time with your children.

You reconnect with family.

You start paying your bills.

Maybe you pick up an old hobby.

Maybe you return to church.

Maybe you finally start taking care of your house.

And all of that is good.

Some of it may represent enormous progress.

But notice the direction you’re moving.

You’re going back.

Going Back Isn’t the Same as Moving Forward

There is something incredibly appealing about getting your old life back.

Addiction takes things from us.

So recovery naturally becomes associated with getting those things back.

Our family.

Our career.

Our health.

Our finances.

Our reputation.

Our freedom.

Maybe even our self-respect.

But there is a problem with trying to reconstruct the life we had before everything fell apart.

That was also the life in which addiction developed.

That doesn’t mean your marriage caused your addiction.

It doesn’t mean your job caused it.

It doesn’t mean your family caused it.

And it certainly doesn’t mean everyone needs to abandon their old life and start over.

It means something considerably simpler.

There were things about the way you were living that you couldn’t manage particularly well.

Maybe you couldn’t tolerate anxiety.

Maybe you couldn’t sit still.

Maybe you hated being alone.

Maybe you hated being around other people.

Maybe you needed everyone to like you.

Maybe you couldn’t tolerate boredom.

Maybe you were angry all the time.

Maybe you couldn’t stop thinking.

Maybe you didn’t know how to ask for help.

Maybe you had no idea how to relax without chemically changing the way you felt.

Whatever it was, the substance eventually found a job.

And for some period of time, it may have done that job remarkably well.

Then you got sober.

The substance left.

The job didn’t.

Recovery Has a Vacancy Problem

This is one of the parts of recovery I don’t think we talk about enough.

When you remove drugs and alcohol, they leave behind an extraordinary amount of empty space.

Not just time.

Although there can suddenly be a lot of that.

They leave emotional space.

Social space.

Behavioral space.

Sometimes even physical space.

What do you do on Friday night now?

What do you do when you’re angry?

What do you do after a terrible day at work?

How do you celebrate?

How do you meet people?

How do you date?

How do you fall asleep?

What do you do when you’re anxious?

What do you do when you’re bored?

What do you do when everybody else goes home and you’re sitting alone with yourself?

During active addiction, the answer to a surprising number of those questions may have eventually become the same.

Use.

Then recovery takes that answer away.

And if we aren’t careful, we spend the next several years trying to fill all of those vacancies with the same life we were already living.

Returning to Your Life Is Not the Same as Building One

Going back to the gym is good.

Going back to work is good.

Repairing your marriage is good.

Being present for your children is good.

Paying your bills is good.

There is nothing wrong with returning to things addiction took away.

You probably should.

But recovery also needs something new.

New relationships.

New routines.

New interests.

New responsibilities.

New boundaries.

New ways of dealing with discomfort.

New ways of having fun.

New ways of being alone.

New ways of being with other people.

Maybe you need therapy.

Maybe you need a recovery community.

Maybe you need faith.

Maybe you need service.

Maybe you need to learn how to cook.

Maybe you need to travel somewhere you’ve never been.

Maybe you need to pick up a book.

Maybe you need to learn something completely useless simply because you enjoy learning it.

Maybe you need to discover what you actually like now that you’re no longer organizing your life around getting intoxicated.

Not everything in recovery needs to be therapeutic.

Some things are allowed to exist simply because they make your life better.

That’s important.

Because eventually, sobriety has to become more than an ongoing project dedicated to preventing yourself from drinking.

When Sobriety Becomes the Entire Identity

Early in recovery, it makes sense for sobriety to occupy an enormous amount of mental space.

Sometimes it needs to.

Where am I going?

Who am I going with?

Will there be alcohol there?

Who should I call?

Where’s the meeting?

What happens if I get an urge?

How many days do I have?

Early recovery can require that kind of attention because the consequences of getting it wrong can be enormous.

But eventually something else has to happen.

Not drinking has to stop being the most interesting thing about your life.

You need things you’re moving toward, not just something you’re running away from.

Because there is an enormous difference between:

I don’t drink anymore.

and

This is how I live now.

One describes the absence of a behavior.

The other describes a life.

The Problem With Being “Good”

There is another trap here.

Sometimes people get sober and become incredibly good at doing everything they’re supposed to do.

They work.

They exercise.

They go to meetings.

They take care of their children.

They keep appointments.

They pay their bills.

They become reliable.

And they’re absolutely miserable.

That doesn’t necessarily mean they’re doing anything wrong.

Sometimes life takes a long time to improve.

There are consequences of addiction that don’t disappear because someone finally starts making better decisions.

Trust takes time to rebuild.

Debt takes time to repay.

Relationships may never return.

Trauma doesn’t disappear.

Depression doesn’t automatically lift.

And there are some things we have done that cannot be undone.

Recovery doesn’t guarantee happiness.

It guarantees considerably less than that.

But there is also a difference between accepting that life can be difficult and constructing a sober life that consists entirely of obligation.

Wake up.

Work.

Exercise.

Meeting.

Dinner.

Sleep.

Repeat.

That’s certainly more stable than active addiction.

But after enough time, a person may begin asking a dangerous question.

Is this it?

And I think we should take that question seriously.

The Drink May Be Gone. The Relationship With Life May Not Be.

This is where I think the traditional idea of the dry drunk gets something right.

The alcohol can disappear while the person’s fundamental relationship with discomfort remains almost completely unchanged.

When I was using, the pattern might have been:

I don’t like how I feel, so I need to change how I feel immediately.

Getting sober removes one way of accomplishing that.

But the underlying demand can survive.

Now it becomes:

I can’t be okay until my spouse changes.

I can’t be okay until my boss recognizes what I do.

I can’t be okay until my children respect me.

I can’t be okay until people stop disappointing me.

I can’t be okay until my anxiety goes away.

I can’t be okay until life becomes fair.

The chemical escape may be gone.

But I’m still fighting reality every day.

And that is an exhausting way to live.

Recovery doesn’t mean becoming passive.

There are circumstances we should change.

There are relationships we should leave.

There are injustices worth confronting.

There are problems that require solutions.

But there are also moments when reality simply refuses to cooperate with what we want.

And if the only version of life we can tolerate is the version where everything goes our way, sobriety is going to be extraordinarily difficult.

Maybe That’s What Emotional Recovery Actually Is

Maybe emotional recovery isn’t becoming happy all the time.

Maybe it isn’t never becoming angry.

Maybe it isn’t becoming endlessly grateful.

Maybe it isn’t eliminating selfishness, resentment, fear, or every other unpleasant part of being human.

Maybe it’s developing a different relationship with those experiences.

I can be anxious without immediately escaping anxiety.

I can be angry without requiring someone else to suffer for it.

I can be lonely without immediately attaching myself to whoever makes the loneliness disappear.

I can be bored without needing stimulation.

I can be disappointed without deciding my entire life is disappointing.

I can have a terrible day without needing to turn it into a different one.

And maybe most importantly:

I can experience something I don’t like without immediately deciding that I shouldn’t have to experience it.

That’s considerably harder than simply not drinking.

But I think it’s much closer to recovery.

You Need Something to Move Toward

There is a reason I don’t particularly like defining recovery by what someone no longer does.

I don’t drink.

I don’t use drugs.

I don’t go to those places.

I don’t spend time with those people.

Those things may be essential.

But they’re all descriptions of absence.

Eventually we need to ask a different question.

What is here now that wasn’t here before?

Maybe you’re more dependable.

Maybe you learned how to apologize.

Maybe you became a better parent.

Maybe you found people who actually know you.

Maybe you learned how to sit quietly.

Maybe you developed faith.

Maybe you became physically stronger.

Maybe you started creating something.

Maybe you discovered work you care about.

Maybe you learned how to tell somebody no.

Maybe you finally learned how to ask somebody for help.

Maybe you found something you genuinely enjoy.

Maybe you’re simply becoming someone you respect.

Those things don’t happen automatically because the alcohol disappears.

They have to be built.

You Stopped Drinking. Now Build Something.

Getting sober can give you pieces of your old life back.

Sometimes that’s exactly what you need.

Go back to your family.

Go back to work.

Go back to the gym.

Pick up the things you dropped.

Repair what can be repaired.

Make amends where they’re appropriate.

Take responsibility for what happened.

But don’t stop there.

Because the objective of recovery cannot simply be returning to the person you were before addiction took everything apart.

That person deserves compassion.

That person probably did the best they could with what they had.

But that person also had limitations.

So do you.

So do I.

Recovery gives us an unusual opportunity to discover what some of those limitations are and start building something different.

Not because the old life was necessarily terrible.

Not because everything needs to change.

But because abstinence creates space.

And eventually we have to decide what we’re going to put in it.

You stopped drinking.

That’s an extraordinary beginning.

But it is still a beginning.

Go back and reclaim the parts of your life worth reclaiming.

Then add something that wasn’t there before.

Learn something.

Build something.

Meet somebody.

Serve somebody.

Change something.

Become interested in something.

Give yourself reasons to wake up that have nothing to do with the fact that you didn’t drink yesterday.

Because eventually recovery has to become about more than what you stopped doing.

You have to build a life that could not have existed while you were still drinking.

A Shameless Plug

Stopping the behavior is sometimes the clearest part of change.

The harder work is figuring out what the behavior was doing for you, learning how to respond differently when the same needs return, and building a life that contains something worth moving toward.

That is part of the work I help people do through A Perceptual Shift.

I provide online individual therapy for adults throughout Pennsylvania who feel stuck in patterns they understand intellectually but have not been able to change on their own. That may include substance use, anxiety, depression, anger, shame, or the uncomfortable realization that the old way of living no longer works, even if you are not yet sure what should replace it.

Therapy cannot build your life for you.

But it can give you somewhere to begin examining what is missing, what keeps repeating, and what you might want to build next.

If that sounds like work you are ready to begin, you can learn more here:

Online Therapy in Pennsylvania

Epilogue: The Gap

Early recovery often begins with an enormous gap between the person you have been and the person you are trying to become.

On the surface, closing that gap seems like a fairly linear endeavor. You have a starting point. You have a destination. The work required to get from one to the other may even seem relatively clear.

Except it isn’t.

Recovery requires adding things that were not present during active addiction. New habits. New relationships. New ways of thinking. New ways of responding to discomfort.

But it also requires an honest and realistic assessment of who we are, what we want, and what we are actually capable of becoming.

Getting sober does not necessarily move me closer to becoming a star athlete, a model husband, or a successful business owner.

More accurately, it removes an obvious and unavoidable barrier.

Active addiction made those things nearly impossible.

But removing that barrier does not guarantee that I will become any of them.

That can be an extraordinarily difficult reality to accept.

In early recovery, I wanted to believe that every area in which I had failed was the result of my drug use. And don’t get me wrong. Drugs certainly did not help any of my endeavors.

But sometimes my lack of success had deeper causes.

Sometimes I was lazy.

Sometimes I was entitled.

Sometimes I overestimated my abilities.

Sometimes I wanted the outcome without being willing to do the work required to achieve it.

Sometimes I blamed drugs for failures that also belonged to me.

Sobriety did not automatically make me disciplined, humble, realistic, patient, or hardworking. It simply gave me a better opportunity to become those things.

That is a brutal reality check.

It is also one of the most important opportunities recovery offers.

Perhaps the most difficult part of recovery, and the part every person in recovery eventually has to confront, is that progress will be slow and imperfect.

We have to recognize the drug as an enormous hindrance without making it the complete explanation for everything that went wrong.

We have to take responsibility for our shortcomings without allowing them to become evidence that we are incapable of changing.

And we have to accept our progress and our failures with equal measures of honesty, grace, and self-respect.

Because recovery is not the process of discovering that drugs were the only thing standing between us and the people we were always supposed to become.

Sobriety removes the barrier. Recovery is what we choose to build after it is gone.

The main article and epilogue have focused on the difficult parts of recovery: responsibility, patience, honest self-assessment, and the slow work of building a different life. In this week’s Afterthoughts, I want to leave you somewhere lighter. I reflect on one of the most unexpectedly joyful parts of recovery: the renewed ability to experience ordinary life as something extraordinary.

Afterthoughts are available to paid subscribers. If this article gave you something worth considering, becoming a paid subscriber is one way to support A Perceptual Shift and help me continue creating thoughtful, independent writing about recovery, mental health, and the complicated work of becoming someone different.

[Become a paid subscriber to continue reading.]

Subscribe now

Share

Read more

We want honest relationships. Honest friendships. Honest marriages. Honest feedback.

We want people around us who will tell us the truth.

At least, that’s what we say.

The problem is that honesty becomes considerably less appealing when the truth being discussed is about us.

It’s easy to value honesty when someone tells us something we already believe. It’s much harder when someone points out a contradiction we’ve been ignoring, a pattern we’d rather explain away, or a behavior that doesn’t fit particularly well with the person we believe ourselves to be.

Those conversations are uncomfortable.

So we often avoid them.

Sometimes we avoid saying something because we don’t want to hurt someone.

Sometimes we avoid saying it because we don’t want them to be angry with us.

Sometimes we avoid hearing something because the person saying it is wrong.

And sometimes we avoid hearing it because we’re afraid they might be right.

The difficulty is knowing the difference.

We Are All Inconsistent

Human beings are remarkably good at holding two contradictory ideas at the same time.

We say our family is the most important thing in our lives while consistently giving them whatever time remains after everything else.

We say we want to be healthier while continuing habits that make us feel worse.

We say we desperately want a relationship while repeatedly withdrawing whenever someone gets close enough to hurt us.

We say we want financial security while spending money in ways that make it nearly impossible.

We say we hate drama while somehow finding ourselves surrounded by it everywhere we go.

We say we want our lives to change while protecting many of the behaviors that keep our lives exactly the same.

None of this necessarily makes us dishonest.

It makes us human.

What we want and what we do are not always perfectly aligned. Our intentions compete with our impulses. Our long-term goals compete with immediate relief. Our values compete with fear, comfort, habit, resentment, pride, and a thousand other things.

Most of the time, we can find a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy.

And sometimes the explanation is completely legitimate.

But occasionally, somebody notices the discrepancy.

And they say something.

“You keep telling me you want this, but I keep watching you do that.”

Suddenly, two realities we’ve managed to keep comfortably separated are sitting beside each other.

That’s confrontation.

Not necessarily anger.

Not accusation.

Not humiliation.

Just friction. And sometimes friction is exactly what we need.

Confrontation Is Not Conflict

We tend to hear the word confrontation and imagine an argument.

Raised voices. Accusations. Defensiveness. Someone storming out of a room.

But confrontation doesn’t have to look like that.

There is a considerable difference between saying:

“You’re selfish.”

and:

“You’ve told me your family is your priority, but lately it seems like work gets the best of you and we get whatever is left.”

There is a difference between:

“You don’t care about me.”

and:

“You’ve cancelled the last three times we’ve made plans, and I’m starting to wonder what that means.”

There is a difference between:

“You’re making excuses.”

and:

“I’ve noticed that whenever we talk about what happened, we spend a lot of time talking about what everyone else did and very little time talking about the choices you made.”

All of those statements might make someone uncomfortable.

But discomfort isn’t necessarily cruelty.

Good confrontation doesn’t tell someone who they are.

It asks them to look at what they’re doing.

That’s an important distinction.

Once I tell you that you’re selfish, manipulative, lazy, irresponsible, or uncaring, there isn’t much left for you to examine.

I’ve already reached the conclusion for you.

Your options are essentially to accept my judgment or defend yourself against it.

But if I point toward something I’ve observed and leave some room around it, something different becomes possible.

You can think.

You can disagree.

You can explain something I haven’t considered.

Or you can begin to notice something about yourself that you couldn’t see before.

The goal isn’t to corner someone.

It’s to make avoidance slightly more difficult.

The People Who Love Us Are Often Afraid to Tell Us the Truth

There is an uncomfortable paradox in close relationships.

The more important someone becomes to us, the more we have to lose by upsetting them.

So sometimes the people closest to us become the least willing to challenge us.

A spouse doesn’t mention the drinking because every previous conversation became an argument.

A friend stops commenting on the terrible relationship because they’ve already watched you defend it five times.

A parent avoids discussing money because their adult child immediately becomes defensive.

A coworker sees a problem developing but decides it isn’t worth the conflict.

Eventually, everyone learns which subjects are safe.

The relationship becomes peaceful.

But peace and health are not always the same thing.

Sometimes we preserve harmony by quietly agreeing not to discuss the things that are hurting us.

That’s not necessarily kindness.

Sometimes it’s fear dressed like kindness.

There are relationships in which keeping the relationship comfortable eventually prevents the relationship from being useful.

That doesn’t mean we should constantly criticize the people around us. Nobody needs a spouse, friend, parent, or coworker perpetually searching for flaws to identify.

Not every contradiction needs to be confronted.

Not every irritating behavior requires a conversation.

Not every observation needs to be shared.

Restraint matters.

But there are moments when something matters enough that silence stops being neutral.

And then we have to decide whether we’re willing to risk a little discomfort for something more important.

Start With Curiosity

When we finally decide to confront someone, we often make a predictable mistake.

We begin too strongly.

We’ve usually been thinking about the issue much longer than the other person knows.

By the time we speak, we’ve accumulated evidence. We’ve replayed conversations. We’ve anticipated excuses. We’ve built our argument.

And then we unload the conclusion.

“You always do this.”

“You never take responsibility.”

“You don’t actually want to change.”

“You only care about yourself.”

Maybe there is some truth buried inside those statements.

But they’re terrible invitations to reflection.

If the goal is actually to help someone see something, start smaller.

“Help me understand something.”

“I’ve noticed something, and I’m wondering if you see it too.”

“How do these two things fit together for you?”

“I’m wondering if there’s a pattern here.”

Curiosity is not weakness.

It is an acknowledgment that our interpretation of another person is still an interpretation.

Sometimes the person will explain something we hadn’t considered.

Sometimes we’ll discover that our observation was accurate but our explanation was completely wrong.

And sometimes the question will simply hang there for a while.

That’s okay.

We don’t always need an immediate answer.

Sometimes You’re the One Who Needs to Hear It

Of course, everything changes when we’re on the other side of the conversation.

Someone tells us something about ourselves that we don’t like.

The instinct is immediate.

Explain.

Defend.

Correct.

Provide context.

Tell them what they misunderstood.

Point out their hypocrisy.

Remind them of all the things they don’t know.

And sometimes we should.

People can misunderstand us.

People can project their own experiences onto us.

People can be unfair, judgmental, manipulative, controlling, or simply wrong.

Someone confronting you does not make them correct.

But there’s another possibility worth considering.

Maybe they’re seeing something you aren’t.

That possibility is difficult because our behavior usually makes sense from inside our own heads.

We know our intentions.

We know the circumstances.

We know the reasons.

We know what we meant to do.

Other people don’t have access to any of that.

They only have access to what we actually do.

And occasionally, the distance between those two perspectives reveals something important.

You may genuinely intend to prioritize your marriage.

Your spouse experiences someone who is rarely available.

You may genuinely believe you are trying to change.

Your friend sees the same decisions repeating themselves.

You may genuinely think everyone around you is unreasonable.

Someone else notices that you’ve had remarkably similar conflicts at three different jobs, in four different relationships, and across several friendships.

That doesn’t prove they’re right.

But patterns deserve curiosity.

Especially recurring ones.

Discomfort Is Data, Not Proof

One of the most dangerous assumptions we can make during confrontation is that defensiveness proves guilt.

“You wouldn’t be this upset if it weren’t true.”

That’s convenient.

It also makes the accusation impossible to challenge.

People become defensive for all kinds of reasons.

Sometimes we’re defensive because somebody has touched a truth we’ve been avoiding.

Sometimes we’re defensive because we’re ashamed.

Sometimes we’re defensive because we feel misunderstood.

Sometimes we’re defensive because the person speaking has terrible timing.

Sometimes we’re defensive because the accusation reminds us of something painful from our past.

And sometimes we’re defensive because the other person is simply wrong.

Your emotional reaction tells you that something happened inside you.

It doesn’t automatically tell you why.

So instead of immediately deciding:

“I’m angry, therefore they’re wrong.”

Or:

“I’m angry, therefore they must be right.”

There is another possibility.

“I’m angry. I should probably figure out why.”

That little bit of space matters.

Because you can take someone’s observation seriously without accepting it.

You can think about what they said.

You can ask other people you trust.

You can watch your own behavior.

You can consider whether you’ve heard something similar before.

And after all of that, you may still conclude that they’re wrong.

Reflection doesn’t require agreement.

The Person Confronting You Might Be Wrong

This matters enough to say plainly.

People who “tell it like it is” are not always telling it like it is.

Sometimes they’re just telling it like they see it.

There is a difference.

Confidence doesn’t make an interpretation accurate.

Neither does age, experience, intelligence, authority, friendship, parenthood, marriage, or professional expertise.

We get people wrong.

All of us.

Which means that if we’re going to confront other people, we need to maintain the possibility that our interpretation could be mistaken.

There are few phrases more powerful in a relationship than:

“I got that wrong.”

Not:

“I’m sorry you took it that way.”

Not:

“That’s not what I meant.”

Not:

“I was only trying to help.”

Just:

“I got that wrong.”

Being willing to challenge someone requires confidence.

Being willing to discover that you challenged them unfairly requires something harder.

Humility.

And those two qualities need each other.

Confidence without humility becomes arrogance.

Humility without confidence becomes silence.

Healthy relationships need enough of both for people to say difficult things and survive discovering that they were mistaken.

Accountability Is Not Shame

There is another reason confrontation goes badly.

We confuse accountability with identity.

There is a significant difference between saying:

“You did something harmful.”

and:

“You are a bad person.”

The first asks someone to take responsibility for behavior.

The second turns the behavior into a definition of the human being.

That distinction matters because shame often feels like accountability while producing very little of it.

When people believe their behavior proves something fundamentally terrible about who they are, they don’t necessarily become more honest.

They hide.

They minimize.

They blame.

They become defensive.

They withdraw.

They attack.

They avoid looking at the behavior because looking at the behavior feels like accepting a verdict about themselves.

Real accountability requires something more difficult.

I did this.

It mattered.

Other people may have been hurt by it.

There may have been circumstances that influenced me, but those circumstances do not erase the choices that were mine.

I am responsible for understanding what happened.

And I am responsible for changing whatever needs to change so that I don’t keep doing it.

We don’t need to minimize behavior to preserve someone’s humanity.

And we don’t need to destroy someone’s humanity to take their behavior seriously.

Both can be true.

Before You Say It

There is a question worth asking before confronting someone:

Those motivations can feel remarkably similar.

Maybe I’m angry.

Maybe I’m tired of listening to the same complaint.

Maybe I want you to admit that I was right.

Maybe I want to punish you.

Maybe I’ve been holding something in for six months and I’m finally going to make you understand what you’ve put me through.

Those feelings may be completely legitimate.

But they change the conversation.

Sometimes the most responsible thing we can do with an accurate observation is wait.

Timing matters.

So does tone.

So does the relationship.

So does the other person’s ability to hear us.

And so does our own ability to speak without turning an observation into a weapon.

Not every truth needs to be spoken immediately.

After You Say It

Then comes perhaps the hardest part.

We are remarkably uncomfortable with silence after saying something difficult.

So we soften it.

Explain it.

Repeat it.

Defend it.

Add examples.

Reassure the person.

Withdraw half of what we just said.

Sometimes we don’t give people enough time to experience what we’ve told them.

They get quiet.

We panic.

But silence doesn’t necessarily mean the conversation has gone badly.

Maybe they’re angry.

Maybe they’re hurt.

Maybe they’re trying to decide whether you’re right.

Maybe they’re remembering something.

Maybe they’re seeing a connection they haven’t seen before.

Maybe they simply don’t know what to say yet.

Let them think.

If you’ve said something important carefully, you don’t necessarily need to convince them of it.

The conversation may continue tomorrow.

Or next week.

Or internally, without you.

The Relationships That Can Tolerate Truth

I don’t think the strongest relationships are the ones in which people always understand each other.

That’s probably impossible.

I think they’re the ones that can survive the moments when they don’t.

Relationships where someone can say:

“I think you’re wrong.”

“I think you’re avoiding this.”

“I don’t think you’re being fair.”

“I’m worried about what you’re doing.”

“That hurt me.”

“I think there’s something here you aren’t seeing.”

And the relationship doesn’t immediately become a referendum on whether the other person loves us.

That requires something from both people.

The person speaking has to care more about truth than being right.

The person listening has to care more about growth than protecting themselves from every uncomfortable observation.

Neither person gets certainty.

One person may be wrong.

The other may be defensive.

Both may misunderstand each other.

The conversation may need to be revisited.

An apology may eventually be necessary.

That’s what makes these conversations difficult.

But maybe the purpose of confrontation was never certainty.

Maybe it was awareness.

Sometimes change begins when someone offers us a completely new way of seeing our lives.

But sometimes the shift is much smaller.

Someone simply takes two things we already know and places them beside each other.

You say you want this.

You keep doing that.

How do those two things fit together?

We may have a good answer.

We may discover that the person asking the question misunderstood us.

Or we may suddenly see the contradiction ourselves.

The person who asked doesn’t need us to say:

“You’re right.”

Maybe the most important response is quieter than that.

I need to think about that.

Sometimes that’s exactly where change begins.

Shameless Plug

If you’ve made it this far, there’s a decent chance something in this article made you think about your own life a little differently.

That’s kind of the point.

A Perceptual Shift was built around the idea that meaningful change often begins by seeing something differently, especially the things we’ve gotten very good at explaining to ourselves.

That’s part of the work I do in individual counseling. It’s also part of how I approach clinical supervision with social workers. I don’t think either should simply be a place where someone agrees with you for an hour.

Sometimes support means validation.

Sometimes it means encouragement.

And sometimes it means having someone who cares enough about where you’re trying to go to ask:

You say you want this. You keep doing that. How do those two things fit together?

If you’re in Pennsylvania and looking for short-term individual counseling or LCSW supervision, you can learn more at A Perceptual Shift.

The ideas in this article are easy enough to discuss in theory.

They’re considerably harder when you’re the person living the contradiction.

For me, that isn’t theoretical.

Below the paywall, I want to tell you about what this looked like in my own life, when the people around me could see what was happening, I could see what was happening, and somehow we all kept pretending otherwise.

Epilogue

As an addict in recovery, the experience of wanting to live one way while actually living another is deeply personal to me.

I’ve been in the position of wanting nothing more than to change my life for the better while simultaneously making the decision to continue using dangerous, mind-altering drugs.

That contradiction seems obvious from the outside.

It was obvious from the inside, too.

That’s one of the strange things about addiction. I didn’t need someone to explain to me that what I was doing was dangerous. I could see what it was doing to my life. I could see the distance growing between the person I wanted to be and the person my decisions were creating.

The people closest to me could see it too.

But I’ve also seen what happens when people love you enough that they’re afraid to hurt you. They see the danger. They see the consequences. They notice the changes. And sometimes, because they don’t know what to say, don’t want to push you away, or are afraid of what will happen if they confront you, they say nothing.

Eventually, something even stranger happens.

You know they know.

They probably know that you know they know.

But you pretend they don’t know because they seem willing to pretend they don’t know.

Everyone begins participating in a reality that nobody actually believes.

And that silence can become its own kind of feedback loop.

The person struggling with addiction doesn’t have to confront what is happening because nobody is saying it out loud. The people around them don’t have to risk the confrontation because the person struggling hasn’t admitted what is happening. Everyone has reasons for maintaining the silence.

Meanwhile, the problem gets worse.

I don’t say that to blame the people surrounding someone with an addiction. Loving someone who is destroying themselves puts you in an extraordinarily difficult position. Confrontation doesn’t guarantee change. Saying the perfect thing doesn’t make someone ready. And sometimes the people closest to us have already said everything they know how to say.

But I do think there is something uniquely dangerous about a reality everyone can see and no one is willing to name.

Recovery eventually required me to stop negotiating with that reality.

There was the life I said I wanted.

And there was the life my decisions were actually creating.

No amount of explanation could make those two things compatible.

At some point, I had to be willing to put them beside each other and look.

You say you want this.

You keep doing that.

How do those two things fit together?

For a long time, I had answers to that question.

Recovery began when those answers stopped being good enough.

There is a reason I understand this kind of love so personally.

I’ve written about the contradiction of addiction, about the strange silence that can develop around it, and about the importance of someone finally being willing to say what everyone already knows.

But those ideas aren’t where I learned this lesson.

I learned it from someone who loved me enough to stop protecting me from the consequences of my own choices.

And I’ve never told that story here before.

Read more

When we are sad, we can sometimes recognize that sadness is affecting the way we see things. When we are anxious, we may eventually realize that our fear has exaggerated the likelihood of something terrible happening. When we are embarrassed, we can occasionally remind ourselves that other people probably aren’t thinking about us nearly as much as we imagine they are.

Anger is different.

Anger tends to arrive with certainty.

When we are angry, we don’t simply feel something.

We feel like we know something.

They disrespected me.

They don’t care about me.

They knew exactly what they were doing.

I shouldn’t have to deal with this.

I deserve better than this.

And sometimes we’re right.

People can be disrespectful. People can be selfish. They can lie to us, betray us, manipulate us, take advantage of us, disappoint us, and occasionally do things they know will hurt us.

Anger is not inherently irrational.

But it is incredibly persuasive.

And there is an important difference between saying:

I am angry about what happened.

and saying:

My anger proves that I understand what happened.

Those are not the same thing.

Anger Is Information

There is nothing particularly wrong with being angry.

Anger is part of being human.

Trying to eliminate it entirely would probably be both impossible and undesirable.

Anger can tell us that something matters.

It can tell us that a boundary has been crossed.

That something feels unfair.

That someone we trusted disappointed us.

That we expected something different.

That we feel threatened.

That we feel powerless.

That something we care deeply about is at risk.

Sometimes anger even gives us the energy necessary to change something that desperately needs changing.

The problem isn’t that anger speaks.

The problem is that anger has a tendency to speak with authority.

It doesn’t usually say:

I’m angry. Maybe we should figure out why.

It says:

I’m angry, and let me explain exactly who is responsible.

That’s an important distinction.

Because emotions are extraordinarily good at telling us about our experience.

They aren’t always as good at explaining its cause.

When We’re Angry With Someone Else

Think about the last time someone really pissed you off.

Not mildly annoyed you.

Really pissed you off.

There’s a good chance you didn’t spend much time wondering about the nuances of the situation.

You probably had a story.

Maybe they were inconsiderate.

Maybe they were selfish.

Maybe they didn’t appreciate you.

Maybe they should have known better.

Maybe they knew exactly what they were doing.

And once we have that story, something interesting happens.

We start collecting evidence.

Every unanswered text becomes further proof.

Every facial expression means something.

Their tone matters.

The words they chose matter.

The words they didn’t choose matter.

Things that happened six months ago suddenly become relevant again.

Anger is remarkably good at building a case.

Unfortunately, it often appoints itself detective, prosecutor, judge, and jury.

That doesn’t mean the case is wrong.

It means there hasn’t been much of a defense.

Maybe the person really was inconsiderate.

Maybe they really did behave selfishly.

Maybe you absolutely deserve an apology.

But perhaps there are pieces of the story you don’t know.

And perhaps some of what you’re reacting to isn’t entirely about what happened today.

Maybe this isn’t the first time you’ve felt ignored.

Maybe being dismissed has always bothered you.

Maybe you expected this person to behave differently.

Maybe you’re exhausted.

Maybe you’re already overwhelmed.

Maybe what they said touched something much older than the conversation you’re having.

Or maybe they were just an asshole.

That’s possible too.

Curiosity doesn’t require us to excuse bad behavior.

It simply asks us not to confuse the intensity of our reaction with the accuracy of our interpretation.

When We’re Angry With Ourselves

Other people aren’t the only ones who disappoint us.

We are perfectly capable of doing that ourselves.

We lose our temper.

We procrastinate.

We spend money we said we weren’t going to spend.

We eat something we promised ourselves we wouldn’t.

We don’t go to the gym.

We waste an afternoon.

We say something we immediately wish we could take back.

We fall back into a habit we thought we’d finally escaped.

And then comes the anger.

What the hell is wrong with me?

I know better than this.

Why do I keep doing this?

I should be further along by now.

There is something strangely seductive about being angry with ourselves.

It feels productive.

It feels like accountability.

If I’m angry enough about what I did, then surely that means I’m taking it seriously.

And if I punish myself enough for doing it, maybe I can make sure I never do it again.

But punishment and change are not the same thing.

Sometimes anger at ourselves does motivate change.

But sometimes it simply gives us somewhere to put our disappointment.

Instead of asking why we did what we did, we condemn the person who did it.

Us.

And condemnation tends to end curiosity.

If the explanation is simply that I’m lazy, stupid, weak, selfish, irresponsible, or broken, there isn’t much left to investigate.

The verdict has already been handed down.

But there is usually more to understand.

Maybe the goal was unrealistic.

Maybe we were exhausted.

Maybe we wanted immediate relief more than we wanted the distant reward we’d promised ourselves.

Maybe the behavior we hate actually serves some function we haven’t figured out how to replace yet.

Maybe we’re trying to become someone different while still living in an environment designed around the person we’ve always been.

Understanding those things doesn’t excuse our behavior.

It gives us a chance to change it.

You can hold yourself accountable without hating the person you’re holding accountable.

When Someone Is Angry With You

Then there is the other side of anger.

Someone else’s.

This is where things get particularly complicated.

Because just as our own anger can feel like evidence that someone else has done something wrong, someone else’s anger can feel like evidence that we have done something wrong.

Someone is upset with us.

Their voice changes.

Their face changes.

Maybe they yell.

Maybe they withdraw.

Maybe they tell us exactly what they think we’ve done.

And suddenly we find ourselves responding not only to the situation, but to the force of their emotion.

Maybe they’re right.

That’s worth saying clearly.

Sometimes people are angry with us because we behaved badly.

We can be selfish.

We can be inconsiderate.

We can hurt people.

We can fail to listen.

We can become defensive when someone tells us something about ourselves that we don’t particularly want to hear.

Someone else’s anger should not automatically be dismissed simply because it makes us uncomfortable.

But their anger isn’t automatically proof either.

Someone can be furious with you and misunderstand you.

Someone can be disappointed in you because you refused to do something you never should have been expected to do.

Someone can accuse you of being selfish because you established a boundary.

Someone can experience your disagreement as disrespect.

Someone can be angry because you changed.

Someone can be angry because you didn’t.

And someone can be completely sincere in their anger while being completely wrong about your intentions.

Their emotional experience is real.

Their interpretation of you may not be.

That distinction is incredibly difficult to maintain when someone we care about is angry with us.

Our instinct is often to choose one extreme or the other.

We immediately surrender:

You’re right. I’m sorry. I’ll fix it.

Or we immediately defend:

You’re being ridiculous. This is your problem.

Neither requires much curiosity.

The harder response is to listen seriously enough to consider whether there is something we need to own without automatically accepting everything being said about us.

Maybe I hurt you.

Maybe I owe you an apology.

Maybe I need to change something.

And maybe some of what you’re saying about me isn’t true.

Those things can exist at the same time.

Anger Doesn’t Have to Be the Enemy

I don’t think we need to become less angry.

At least not necessarily.

I think we need to become more interested in our anger.

There is a subtle but important difference.

Trying not to be angry makes anger itself the problem.

Curiosity asks what the anger might be pointing toward.

What happened?

What did I expect to happen?

What am I assuming about the other person’s intentions?

Why does this particular thing bother me so much?

What am I protecting?

What am I afraid might happen next?

What part of this belongs to the other person?

What part belongs to me?

And if someone else is angry with me:

What are they actually telling me?

Is there something here I need to hear?

Is there something I need to take responsibility for?

And what am I being asked to believe about myself simply because someone else feels it strongly?

None of those questions require us to stop being angry before we answer them.

They simply create a little space between the feeling and the conclusion.

And sometimes that space is enough.

Enough to keep us from sending the text.

Enough to keep us from saying the cruel thing.

Enough to recognize that the argument we’re having isn’t really the argument we’re having.

Enough to apologize.

Enough to refuse an apology we don’t owe.

Enough to recognize that someone else’s anger belongs partly to them.

Enough to recognize that ours belongs partly to us.

Anger deserves to be taken seriously.

But taking anger seriously does not mean believing everything it tells us.

Because anger is an emotion.

It is an experience.

It is information.

Sometimes it is even a warning.

But it is not a verdict.

The goal isn’t to stop getting angry.

It’s to stop assuming anger has already figured everything out.

And sometimes figuring out what it is trying to tell us is difficult to do alone.

Anger has a way of becoming tangled up with everything that came before it. Old relationships. Old disappointments. Expectations. Fear. Shame. The things we wish we’d done differently and the things we’re still convinced other people should have done differently.

Sometimes we need another person to help us sort through all of that.

Which brings me to a completely shameless plug.

I currently have a limited number of openings for individual counseling through A Perceptual Shift. My approach to therapy is goal-directed and practical. The purpose isn’t to spend the next several years talking about how angry you are. It’s to understand what is happening, why it keeps happening, and what you can actually do differently.

If anger, relationships, patterns you can’t seem to break, or simply feeling stuck have brought you to a point where you’d like some help figuring out what comes next, you can learn more about counseling through A Perceptual Shift.

You don’t have to stop being angry first.

We can start there.

Epilogue

Therapists and social workers get angry too.

We get annoyed. Frustrated. Impatient. Offended. Sometimes we even dislike the person sitting across from us.

The profession has a word for some of what happens next: countertransference.

And despite what young clinicians sometimes imagine, the goal isn’t to become so enlightened that another human being can no longer get under your skin. The goal is to develop the self-awareness, and often the humility, necessary to recognize the reaction, understand it, and decide what to do with it.

The human condition is complex. People present with a multitude of poorly defined problems for which the solutions can seem impossible to reach. I used to think therapists, social workers, and people in the human service professions had all the answers.

After 21 years of clinical practice, I’ve come to understand that the very best tend to simply have better questions.

The angriest I’ve ever become at work has had very little to do with the individual sitting in front of me.

It has come from my inability to meaningfully change their circumstances.

And that anger can be as complicated as it is intense.

You’re angry at yourself.

You’re angry at the system.

You’re angry at the circumstances.

You’re angry at the insurance company, the hospital, the agency, the bureaucracy, the lack of resources, the rules that make absolutely no sense, and quite literally anyone or anything that seems to be standing between the person in front of you and a better life.

Sometimes you’re even angry at the person you’re trying to help.

And then, if you’re paying attention, you may become angry with yourself for being angry with them.

That’s the part of this work that I don’t think we talk about enough.

Throughout my career, I’ve been incredibly fortunate to have supervisors, colleagues, friends, and family who have masterfully done two things for me: helped guide my anger and given it the space it needed to exist.

They didn’t tell me I shouldn’t be angry.

They didn’t always agree that I had a right to be angry either.

They helped me understand it.

Sometimes that meant recognizing that my anger was pointing toward something genuinely unjust. Sometimes it meant accepting that I was trying to control something I simply could not control. Sometimes it meant recognizing that I had made someone else’s problem my own. And sometimes it meant the considerably less comfortable realization that the problem wasn’t entirely the system, the circumstances, or the person sitting across from me.

Sometimes part of the problem was me.

That is where humility becomes important.

The goal has never been to eradicate the anger. I’m not sure I would want to even if I could.

Some of that anger comes from caring deeply about what happens to another human being. Some of it has pushed me to advocate harder, ask another question, make another phone call, challenge a decision, or refuse to accept an answer that didn’t make sense.

And some of it has been completely fucking useless.

Learning the difference has taken me the better part of 21 years.

I’m still learning it.

Maybe that’s the point.

Whether you’re sitting on the couch or in the therapist’s chair, anger doesn’t need to disappear before you can become better at living with it.

It needs somewhere to go.

It needs space.

It needs good questions.

And, every once in a while, it needs someone willing to sit beside you long enough to help you figure out what the hell it’s trying to tell you.

There is one part of this conversation about anger that I haven’t touched yet.

My own.

Anger has played a much larger role in my life, and in the creation of A Perceptual Shift, than I’ve probably ever acknowledged publicly. And somewhere along the way, my relationship with it began to change.

For this week’s Afterthoughts, I wanted to write about that.

Read more

But it also became a business built around a related question: does professional help have to work the way we’ve become accustomed to it working?

In Episode Zero, I talk about both. How my own experiences with recovery, marriage, fatherhood, social work, business, and entrepreneurship shaped the idea behind A Perceptual Shift, and why I decided to build a business around affordable, focused, goal-directed professional services.

This is the beginning of something new.

I’m glad you’re here.

It sounds like a philosophical question.

Maybe even an unnecessarily dramatic one.

Most of us could probably answer it without thinking very hard. We would give our name. Our profession. Our relationships. Maybe our values.

I am a husband.

I am a father.

I am a social worker.

I am a writer.

I am disciplined.

I am kind.

I am successful.

I am a mess.

I am lazy.

I am anxious.

I am unreliable.

Some of those descriptions may be flattering. Others considerably less so.

But all of them share something important.

They are conclusions.

And conclusions require evidence.

Which raises a much more interesting question:

Where did the evidence come from?

We Are, in Part, What We Repeatedly Do

There are probably a thousand different ways to answer the question of identity.

Biology matters. Personality matters. Childhood matters. Culture matters. Relationships matter. Trauma matters. Values matter. The stories other people have told about us matter.

But behavior matters too.

Probably more than we would sometimes like to admit.

If I tell myself that I am generous but consistently behave selfishly, eventually there is a problem.

If I believe I am dependable but repeatedly fail to show up when people need me, there is a problem.

If I say that my family is the most important thing in my life but consistently give them whatever energy remains after everything else has taken its share, there is a problem.

Our ambitions and ideals do not always align with our actions.

And somewhere between those two things sits identity.

We like to think identity determines behavior.

I am disciplined, therefore I exercise.

I am a writer, therefore I write.

I am patient, therefore I respond patiently.

I am courageous, therefore I do difficult things.

Sometimes that’s true.

But I suspect the relationship runs in both directions.

Sometimes we exercise long enough that we begin to think of ourselves as disciplined.

Sometimes we write long enough that we begin to call ourselves writers.

Sometimes we repeatedly tolerate discomfort until we realize that perhaps we have become courageous.

Sometimes behavior has to come first.

And that creates a problem for anyone trying to change.

You Have a Lot of Evidence Against Yourself

Imagine that for the last ten years you have thought of yourself as someone who isn’t particularly disciplined.

There is probably evidence supporting that conclusion.

Plans you abandoned.

Gym memberships you stopped using.

Projects you started and never finished.

Promises you made to yourself on Sunday night that were forgotten by Tuesday afternoon.

Then one day you decide to change.

You make a plan.

Monday goes well.

Tuesday goes well.

Wednesday too.

You make it through an entire week.

Then another.

Something is clearly different.

Except you may not feel particularly different.

Because two weeks of evidence are competing against ten years of evidence.

The old identity has a significant head start.

And our brains aren’t exactly neutral judges.

We notice patterns. We look for confirmation. Recent experiences can become disproportionately important. Other people’s expectations influence us. And once we believe something about ourselves, we become remarkably talented at finding evidence that proves us right.

Which is why one bad day can become so dangerous.

You miss the gym.

You lose your temper.

You procrastinate.

You spend money you shouldn’t have spent.

You fall back into some behavior you were trying desperately to leave behind.

And almost immediately the old identity speaks.

See?

Nothing changed.

That one moment feels more convincing than the previous three weeks because it agrees with something you’ve believed about yourself for years.

Maybe this is simply who I am.

Except it isn’t.

It’s one data point.

Change Isn’t Linear

We have an oddly clean picture of how change is supposed to work.

Effort goes in.

Results come out.

More effort goes in.

Better results come out.

Continue long enough and eventually you arrive wherever you were trying to go.

Real change rarely behaves so politely.

Progress stalls.

Motivation disappears.

Old habits return.

Circumstances change.

You get tired.

You make mistakes.

Sometimes you genuinely regress.

Then you recover.

Then you regress again.

The graph isn’t a straight line.

It’s a mess.

This is one of the reasons changing something about ourselves can be considerably harder than accomplishing a goal.

Goals can be measured.

Lose twenty pounds.

Save ten thousand dollars.

Run a marathon.

Write a book.

Earn a degree.

SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound) goals are useful precisely because they take something vague and make it concrete.

Identity doesn’t cooperate quite as easily.

There is no morning when you wake up and receive a notification:

Congratulations. You are now disciplined.

There is no certificate announcing that you have officially become patient.

Nobody sends you an email informing you that your transformation into a writer is complete.

At some point, almost imperceptibly, the evidence simply begins to shift.

And eventually your understanding of yourself shifts with it.

Identity Lags Behind Behavior

I think this may be one of the most frustrating parts of meaningful change.

You can become different before you feel different.

There is a lag.

Your behavior may already be moving toward the person you want to become while your internal understanding of yourself remains stubbornly attached to the person you used to be.

Which means that for a while, change can feel almost fraudulent.

You don’t feel disciplined.

But you keep showing up.

You don’t feel confident.

But you speak anyway.

You don’t feel like a writer.

But you keep writing.

You don’t feel particularly capable.

But you keep doing things that capable people do.

There is something uncomfortable about this stage because we tend to place enormous value on authenticity.

We want our actions to reflect who we “really are.”

But that raises an uncomfortable possibility.

What if waiting to feel authentic is precisely what keeps us from changing?

Perhaps there are moments when becoming someone different requires behaving in ways that don’t yet feel like us.

Not because we are pretending.

Because we are practicing.

Maybe That’s How Identity Changes

There is a popular idea that somewhere underneath everything exists our “true self,” and that enough introspection will eventually uncover it.

Maybe.

But I wonder whether we spend too much time trying to discover ourselves and not enough time deliberately creating ourselves.

There are parts of us we inherit.

Parts we learn.

Parts that are imposed upon us.

Parts that emerge from experiences we never would have chosen.

But there are also parts that are built.

Choice by choice.

Behavior by behavior.

Day by day.

Which means the question “Who am I?” may occasionally be less useful than another one:

What evidence am I producing?

If I want to be someone who takes care of his body, what evidence did I produce today?

If I want to be a present father, what evidence did I produce today?

If I want to be a writer, what evidence did I produce today?

If I want to build something meaningful, what evidence did I produce today?

Not because one day determines who we are.

Quite the opposite.

Because no single day does.

That’s what makes change possible.

You Don’t Have to Believe It Yet

Maybe you’ve spent years believing something about yourself that you desperately want to stop believing.

That you’re lazy.

That you always quit.

That you’re terrible with money.

That you can’t handle discomfort.

That relationships never work for you.

That you’re too old.

That you’re too anxious.

That you’ve wasted too much time.

That you are simply “not the kind of person” who does whatever it is you desperately wish you could do.

You may not be able to talk yourself out of that identity.

And perhaps you shouldn’t try.

Your brain has evidence.

Give it different evidence.

Not once.

Repeatedly.

Imperfectly.

Long enough that the old conclusion becomes increasingly difficult to defend.

There will still be bad days.

There will still be contradictions.

There will still be moments when the old version of you makes a surprisingly convincing reappearance.

That’s okay.

Identity isn’t a verdict handed down after your worst Tuesday.

It is a pattern built across time.

And patterns can change.

Perhaps eventually you will look around at the life you’ve constructed and realize something strange has happened.

The things that once required tremendous effort have become relatively ordinary.

The choices that once felt unnatural now feel increasingly like yours.

The person you were trying so hard to become no longer feels like someone you’re pretending to be.

Your identity has finally caught up with your behavior.

And maybe then you’ll ask the question again.

Who am I?

Only this time, you’ll have different evidence.

A Brief, Shameless Plug

If something in this article resonated with you, this is the kind of thing I spend a lot of time thinking, writing, and talking about through A Perceptual Shift.

I publish essays here about psychology, behavior, relationships, personal growth, social work, and the occasionally absurd experience of trying to become a slightly better human being.

I also provide individual therapy to adults in Pennsylvania and clinical supervision to social workers working toward their LCSW.

And, apparently, I am going to start making videos now too.

If you’d like to follow along, subscribe here or visit A Perceptual Shift to learn more about my writing and clinical work.

Thank you, genuinely, for spending some of your time reading mine.

One more thing before I go.

I’ve spent this entire article writing about identity as though it were something that happens to individual people.

But while writing it, I realized I am watching the same process unfold somewhere else.

In something I’ve been building.

And perhaps that’s why this particular idea has been occupying so much of my attention lately.

Epilogue

“I am not what has happened to me. I am what I choose to become.”
— Carl Jung

“To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment.”
— Ralph Waldo Emerson

I have been thinking about this more than usual lately because I am trying to change something myself.

Or perhaps several things.

Over the past year, I have been trying to figure out what A Perceptual Shift is supposed to become.

It began as one thing.

Then became something else.

Therapy entered the picture.

Clinical supervision grew.

Writing became increasingly important.

Now video is beginning to enter the equation.

And somewhere along the way I realized I had been asking myself a question that may not have an immediate answer:

What is A Perceptual Shift?

I wanted to define it.

Then build it.

But perhaps I’ve had the order backward.

Maybe I have to build it before I can fully define it.

Every article is evidence.

Every supervision session is evidence.

Every conversation is evidence.

Every video will be evidence.

Every time I decide what belongs under the name and what doesn’t, I am answering the question.

Not theoretically.

Behaviorally.

Perhaps businesses develop identities the same way people do.

We make choices.

Those choices become patterns.

Those patterns accumulate.

Eventually something that once felt experimental begins to feel obvious.

Of course this is what we do.

Of course this is who we are.

But it wasn’t obvious when we started.

Read more

We talk a lot about forgiving ourselves.

Maybe too much.

When someone carries guilt over something they have done, the advice is often some variation of the same idea:

You need to forgive yourself.

It sounds compassionate. Sometimes it is.

But I am not convinced that forgiveness is always the first thing we need.

Sometimes we did something wrong.

Sometimes we hurt someone.

Sometimes we lied, betrayed, abandoned, manipulated, neglected, drank, used, cheated, stole, failed, or behaved in a way that violated the values we claim to hold.

And sometimes feeling badly about that is entirely appropriate.

Perhaps the question isn’t immediately:

How do I forgive myself?

Perhaps the better question is:

What am I going to do with the fact that I became someone I didn’t want to be?

Guilt and Shame

Psychology generally makes an important distinction between guilt and shame.

Guilt tends to focus on behavior:

I did something bad.

Shame tends to turn that judgment inward:

I am bad.

That distinction matters.

Guilt can be extraordinarily useful.

If I hurt someone and feel guilty about it, that discomfort tells me something. My behavior violated something I believe about myself, about other people, or about how I am supposed to live.

There is information in that discomfort.

It can compel us to apologize.

To repair something.

To confess.

To stop.

To change.

Shame does something different.

Shame takes the worst thing we have done and quietly turns it into a definition.

I lied.

Therefore, I am a liar.

I failed.

Therefore, I am a failure.

I hurt someone.

Therefore, I am someone who hurts people.

The behavior becomes an identity.

And once that happens, we encounter a difficult problem.

Because sometimes there is evidence supporting the accusation.

You actually did it.

You Cannot Think Your Way Out of Everything

Imagine doing something yesterday that you deeply regret.

You wake up the next morning ashamed.

Someone tells you:

“That’s not who you are.”

Maybe.

But your mind has a fairly reasonable rebuttal:

Then why did I do it?

This is one of the limitations of reassurance.

There are moments when telling ourselves that something doesn’t define us isn’t particularly convincing because the thing happened recently enough that it might, at least partially, describe who we currently are.

That’s uncomfortable.

But discomfort is not always something to eliminate.

Sometimes discomfort is an invitation to change.

And perhaps the answer isn’t finding the perfect sentence that makes us feel better about ourselves.

Perhaps we need evidence.

Put Some Distance Between You and It

There is a remarkably simple response to shame.

Simple does not mean easy.

Put time, energy, and space between the last time you behaved shamefully and the person you are today.

That’s it.

You cannot change yesterday.

But you can change today.

And then tomorrow.

And then the day after that.

Suppose you lied yesterday.

Today, you tell the truth when lying would have been easier.

Then you do it again tomorrow.

And next week.

And six months from now.

At first, you are someone who lied yesterday.

Eventually, you become someone who lied a year ago and has spent the subsequent year practicing honesty.

The lie hasn’t changed.

You have.

That distinction matters enormously.

Time Alone Does Nothing

There is an important qualification here.

Time does not heal everything.

Time merely passes.

A person can spend ten years behaving exactly as they always have and emerge ten years older without being meaningfully different.

So distance from shame requires more than the calendar.

It requires behavior.

Time + changed behavior = distance.

If I betrayed someone’s trust and spend the next five years continuing to betray people, five years have passed.

Very little distance has been created.

But if I spend those five years becoming someone who behaves differently, something begins to happen.

I start accumulating evidence.

Evidence that I tell the truth.

Evidence that I keep commitments.

Evidence that I show up.

Evidence that I tolerate discomfort instead of escaping it.

Evidence that I apologize without demanding forgiveness.

Evidence that I make different decisions when confronted with the same opportunities that once brought out the worst in me.

Eventually, the evidence begins to outweigh the accusation.

Not because the accusation was false.

Because it became outdated.

An Apology Is Not Evidence of Change

We often want resolution quickly.

We apologize.

We explain ourselves.

We promise that it will never happen again.

We ask for forgiveness.

Sometimes we even become frustrated when another person isn’t ready to give it to us.

But apologies describe intentions.

Behavior demonstrates change.

Anyone can say:

“That’s not who I am.”

The harder task is living long enough and consistently enough that the statement becomes demonstrably true.

This is especially important when our behavior harmed another person.

We are not entitled to their forgiveness simply because we have decided to become better.

They may forgive us.

They may not.

They may trust us again.

They may never trust us again.

Change does not create an obligation for the people we hurt to restore the relationship.

That isn’t the bargain.

You change because the person you were becoming was unacceptable to you.

Their forgiveness is theirs.

Your behavior is yours.

You May Always Be Ashamed of It

There are things in our lives that perhaps we should never become completely comfortable with.

I don’t know that the goal of personal growth should be reaching a point where we can look at every terrible thing we’ve ever done and feel nothing.

Sometimes shame contains evidence of something valuable.

A conscience.

Values.

Empathy.

The recognition that another person mattered.

The recognition that we should have known better.

The recognition that we are capable of behaving beneath our own standards.

Growth doesn’t necessarily mean saying:

“I’m glad that happened.”

It may simply mean being able to say:

“I wish I had never done that.”

without immediately adding:

“Therefore, I am irredeemable.”

Those are very different statements.

Stop Trying to Become Innocent Again

There is a fantasy buried inside some forms of self-forgiveness.

We want to become the person who never did it.

We want enough therapy, enough apologies, enough time, enough prayer, enough sobriety, enough personal growth, enough anything to somehow erase the fact that there is a version of our story we desperately wish had never happened.

But you cannot become innocent of something you actually did.

You cannot rewrite history.

And perhaps you don’t need to.

The goal is not to become someone who never made the mistake.

The goal is to become someone who would not make it again.

That person is available to you.

But becoming that person costs something.

It costs time.

It costs humility.

It costs repetition.

It costs tolerating the uncomfortable period when you are behaving differently but don’t yet believe you are different.

And perhaps most painfully, it requires accepting that other people may still remember who you were while you are working very hard to become someone else.

Keep going anyway.

Identity Is Built Through Repetition

We tend to think identity determines behavior.

Sometimes it does.

But behavior also creates identity.

Tell the truth enough times and eventually honesty stops feeling like something you are practicing.

It becomes something you are.

Show up enough times and eventually reliability becomes part of your character.

Stay sober long enough and eventually the person who couldn’t imagine a life without using becomes difficult to recognize.

Practice patience enough times and eventually restraint becomes more natural than reaction.

Make enough difficult choices correctly and eventually you stop needing to convince yourself that you’ve changed.

You know.

Not because you said it.

Because you have receipts.

Years of them.

The Past Doesn’t Disappear

None of this erases what happened.

That is important.

Growth is not historical revisionism.

The person you hurt may still carry consequences.

The relationship may still be gone.

There may be opportunities you never get back.

There may be people who only ever knew the worst version of you.

There may even be consequences that follow you for the rest of your life.

But consequences and identity are not the same thing.

You can accept responsibility for something without sentencing yourself to remain the person who did it.

In fact, remaining that person would be a strange form of accountability.

If you genuinely regret the damage you caused, becoming better may be one of the few meaningful things still available to you.

Eventually

There may come a day when you think about the thing you did and notice something different.

You still wish it hadn’t happened.

You still recognize that it was wrong.

Maybe you still feel a sting of embarrassment, sadness, regret, or shame.

But the memory no longer feels like an indictment of the person standing here today.

Too much has happened since then.

Too many different decisions have been made.

Too many ordinary Mondays have passed where you quietly chose differently.

There is simply too much evidence now.

The person who did that thing still exists.

They are part of your story.

But they are no longer the whole story.

Perhaps that is what self-forgiveness actually looks like.

Not forgetting.

Not excusing.

Not convincing yourself that what happened wasn’t really that bad.

And certainly not demanding that everyone else move on because you have.

Maybe forgiveness arrives much more quietly.

You look backward at someone you once were and realize there is finally enough distance between the two of you to say:

I understand how I became that person.

I accept that I was that person.

And I have spent enough time becoming someone else that I no longer have to be them.

You cannot change what happened.

You cannot make it less wrong.

You cannot become someone who never did it.

But you can put another day between yourself and it.

Then another.

Then another.

And if those days are filled with different choices, eventually something remarkable happens.

The worst thing you did remains true.

It just stops being the truest thing about you.

A Shameless Plug

Given the subject matter, I suppose this is as appropriate a place as any for a shameless plug.

Much of what I’ve written about here sounds simple on paper: recognize the patterns that precede our behavior, understand what we’re trying to accomplish or avoid, and learn to respond differently when we find ourselves there again.

Doing it is considerably harder.

Sometimes we need another person to help us see what we’ve become too close to recognize ourselves.

A Perceptual Shift offers individual therapy as well as clinical supervision for Pennsylvania social workers pursuing their LCSW. Although those are very different relationships, both create space for the same kind of work I’ve described throughout this article: slowing things down, becoming curious about what is happening beneath the surface, recognizing patterns, and figuring out what to do differently when they inevitably show up again.

If you’ve been considering therapy, are looking for LCSW supervision, or simply want to learn more about the services I offer, you can find additional information through A Perceptual Shift.

And now, back to our regularly scheduled shame and guilt.

Before closing, though, I want to take this discussion one step further.

Throughout this article I’ve focused primarily on what happens after we’ve done something we regret: the guilt, the shame, the desire to change, and the slow accumulation of evidence that we are no longer the person our worst moments might suggest.

But if we really want to stop repeating those moments, eventually we have to look backward.

Not simply at what we did.

At what happened immediately before we did it.

That brings us to coping.

Epilogue

“We can’t tell if any of those other versions would have been better or worse. Those lives are happening, it is true, but you are happening as well, and that is the happening we have to focus on.”

Matt Haig, The Midnight Library

Regular readers of A Perceptual Shift hopefully have come to know that I write these articles to myself as much as I write them to anyone else.

Shame, guilt, and grief are all emotions with which I’ve struggled at different points throughout most of my adult life. I don’t think this makes me particularly unique. Rather, I think these emotions are somewhat synonymous with the human condition.

What makes us different is what we do with them.

How, if at all, we change after experiencing them. What we learn about ourselves in the process. And perhaps most importantly, whether we learn enough that we don’t have to keep learning the same lessons in the same ways.

In many ways, this article can be understood through the lens of coping skills.

To get into the weeds a little bit, behavior can often be understood through a relatively simple sequence:

Antecedent → Behavior → Consequence

Something happens.

We respond to it.

Something happens as a result.

Yet when we talk about coping, we have a tendency to focus almost exclusively on the latter two.

We regret the behavior.

We try to manage the consequences.

We apologize. We repair. We distract ourselves. We exercise. We journal. We go to therapy. We promise ourselves that next time will be different.

All of those things can be valuable.

But we frequently neglect the first part.

What happened before the behavior?

And, perhaps more importantly:

What happens when it happens again?

Because the antecedent isn’t necessarily something we can change.

Sometimes the antecedent is rejection.

Sometimes it is loneliness.

Sometimes someone says something cruel to us.

Sometimes we are embarrassed.

Sometimes we’re exhausted.

Sometimes we don’t get the job.

Sometimes someone leaves.

Sometimes we lose someone.

Sometimes another person behaves exactly as they have always behaved, despite our desperately wanting them to be different.

Sometimes life simply happens in a way we don’t particularly like.

We spend an extraordinary amount of energy trying to create lives in which these antecedents no longer occur.

Maybe that’s the wrong goal.

There will always be people who frustrate us. There will always be situations that make us anxious. There will always be disappointments, temptations, losses, insecurities, bad days, old wounds, and circumstances outside of our control.

The work isn’t necessarily eliminating them.

The work is recognizing them.

There is enormous power in being able to say:

I know what this is.

I know what this feeling tends to make me want to do.

I know where this road has taken me before.

And I don’t have to go there again.

That is a coping skill.

Maybe one of the most important ones.

We often think good coping means making ourselves feel better. Sometimes it does.

But sometimes good coping means feeling exactly as badly as the situation warrants and behaving appropriately anyway.

You can feel rejected without retaliating.

You can feel lonely without returning to someone who is harmful to you.

You can feel angry without becoming cruel.

You can feel anxious without avoiding everything that frightens you.

You can feel ashamed without deciding that you are shameful.

You can experience an antecedent without automatically producing the behavior that used to follow it.

And I think this is where coping connects most directly to everything I’ve written above.

Putting time, energy, and space between ourselves and the things we’re ashamed of doesn’t mean constructing a life in which we’re never again confronted by the circumstances that contributed to those behaviors.

Quite the opposite.

Eventually, some version of those circumstances will probably return.

The real measure of change is what happens when they do.

The person who hurt you may hurt you again.

The loneliness may come back.

The opportunity to lie may present itself again.

You may once again find yourself overwhelmed, rejected, embarrassed, afraid, angry, exhausted, or desperate to escape whatever you’re feeling.

And there you are.

Standing at an antecedent you’ve encountered before.

Except this time, you recognize it.

That recognition creates something incredibly valuable.

Space.

Not the years of space we’ve been talking about throughout this article.

Sometimes just a few seconds.

A few seconds between what happened and what you do next.

Enough time to recognize the familiar feeling.

Enough time to remember where the old behavior led.

Enough time to make a different choice.

And then something remarkable happens.

The antecedent doesn’t have to change.

You do.

Perhaps that is one of the clearest ways we can know that we’ve actually grown.

Not because the world stopped presenting us with the things that once brought out the worst in us.

But because it presented us with them again, and this time, we behaved differently.

We cannot control every antecedent.

We cannot undo every consequence.

And we certainly cannot change the behaviors that already belong to our past.

But we can become better at recognizing what is happening inside and around us before the next behavior occurs.

Maybe that’s how we stop repeating the same mistakes.

Maybe that’s how we begin putting real distance between who we were and who we are.

And maybe the goal was never to create a life in which we never again feel shame, guilt, grief, anger, fear, or regret.

Maybe the goal is simply to stop requiring the same mistakes to teach us the same lessons.

The past has already collected its tuition.

We might as well learn something from it.

Read more

A bad day in the present is often a day you dreamed about in the past.

Not always.

Some days are genuinely tragic. Some experiences deserve grief, anger, or fear. To pretend otherwise would be dishonest.

But most of our daily frustrations are different. They are not tragedies. They are ordinary burdens attached to lives we once hoped to have.

The exhausted parent once prayed for a child.

The overwhelmed homeowner once dreamed of owning a house.

The burned out social worker once hoped someone would trust them enough to ask for help.

The entrepreneur buried in emails once wondered if anyone would ever become a client.

The spouse frustrated by another difficult conversation once hoped simply to find someone to love.

Somewhere along the way, the dream became the burden.

Not because the dream changed.

Because our perception did.

We Get Used to the Extraordinary

Human beings have an incredible ability to adapt.

The first paycheck from a new job feels incredible.

Eventually, it becomes expected.

The first house feels like a milestone.

Eventually, it becomes another mortgage payment, another leaking faucet, another Saturday spent mowing the lawn.

The first time someone calls you “Mom” or “Dad” can bring tears to your eyes.

Years later, you’re wondering if you’ll ever get five uninterrupted minutes of silence.

Nothing about these situations became objectively worse.

We simply became accustomed to them.

Psychologists often refer to this as hedonic adaptation. We naturally return toward our emotional baseline after positive and negative life events. What once felt extraordinary slowly begins to feel ordinary.

That isn’t a character flaw.

It’s part of being human.

The danger comes when familiarity quietly convinces us that ordinary is somehow disappointing.

Distance Changes Perspective

Imagine speaking with yourself from ten years ago.

Would they trade places with you?

Maybe they were desperate to find someone who loved them.

Maybe they wanted children.

Maybe they were trying to recover from addiction.

Maybe they dreamed of finishing graduate school.

Maybe they simply hoped to survive another difficult season.

Would that version of you look at today’s problems and think,

“I can’t believe this is what my life has become.”

Or would they think,

“I can’t believe I actually made it here.”

Distance changes perspective.

When we’re close to something, we see every flaw.

When we’re far away, we often remember only what we wanted.

Reality hasn’t changed.

Our vantage point has.

The Stories We Tell Ourselves

One of the central ideas in cognitive behavioral therapy is that situations do not create emotions by themselves.

Our interpretation of those situations matters.

Two people can experience the same event and walk away with completely different emotional experiences because they assign different meanings to what happened.

But I think something happens even before that.

Before we interpret events, we first perceive them.

We quietly decide what kind of situation we’re in.

Is this inconvenience evidence that life is unfair?

Or is it simply the cost of something valuable?

A child waking you at 2:00 a.m. feels different if your mind says,

“I never get any sleep.”

It feels different if your mind says,

“This is exhausting... and this little person once existed only as a hope.”

The situation is identical.

The perception changes everything.

Accuracy Before Judgment

One of the goals of emotional awareness isn’t to feel better.

It is to see more clearly.

That distinction matters.

We often believe every emotion deserves immediate validation.

Sometimes it does.

Sometimes it deserves investigation.

Feeling overwhelmed does not necessarily mean your life is overwhelming.

Feeling trapped does not necessarily mean you are trapped.

Feeling disappointed does not necessarily mean something disappointing has happened.

Emotions are valuable.

They are not infallible.

Their job is to tell us that something deserves our attention.

It is our job to determine whether they are accurately describing reality.

That requires curiosity more than certainty.

Familiarity Can Hide Gratitude

Imagine walking through your home as if you were seeing it for the first time.

The kitchen you complain about.

The driveway you shovel every winter.

The toys scattered across the living room.

The laundry.

The barking dog.

The stack of work waiting on your desk.

None of these are inherently good.

None are inherently bad.

They are evidence of a particular kind of life.

A house.
A family.
A career.
Responsibilities.
People who depend on you.

None of those remove frustration.

But they change what frustration means.

Sometimes we become so close to our blessings that we stop recognizing them as blessings.

A Different Kind of Perceptual Shift

People often believe they need a different life.

A different job.

A different relationship.

A different house.

A different set of circumstances.

Sometimes they do.

Sometimes genuine change is necessary.

But I wonder how often what we really need is something less dramatic.

A different way of seeing.

Not toxic positivity.

Not pretending everything is wonderful.

Not forcing gratitude where grief belongs.

Simply asking one honest question:

Would the person I used to be see today’s burdens differently than I do?

If the answer is yes, perhaps reality isn’t the only thing worth examining.

Perhaps our perception deserves attention too.

Closing Thoughts

Life has a strange habit of disguising answered prayers as ordinary responsibilities.

The promotion eventually becomes stress.

The marriage becomes compromise.

The children become exhaustion.

The business becomes pressure.

The recovery becomes discipline.

The dream becomes maintenance.

None of that means those things have lost their value.

It may simply mean we’ve stood so close to the picture that we’ve forgotten what it looked like from a distance.

Perhaps the greatest shift we can make isn’t toward a different life.

Perhaps it is toward seeing our current one a little more accurately.

Because sometimes...

A bad day in the present is often a day you dreamed about in the past.

If you’ve read this far, thank you.

I hope this article has done more than encourage gratitude. I hope it has invited you to examine the lens through which you’re viewing your own life. Sometimes that examination reveals blessings we’ve overlooked. Other times, it reveals problems we’ve been avoiding. Both discoveries matter.

Before we end, there is one important objection that deserves attention.

Epilogue

Seeing Clearly

There is an uncomfortable conversation that deserves to happen before we finish.

Throughout this article, I’ve argued that our perception of life is often distorted by familiarity, expectations, proximity, and the stories we tell ourselves.

But what if your perception isn’t distorted?

What if your circumstances really are unhealthy?

What if your marriage is abusive?

What if your workplace is exploitative?

What if your addiction is destroying your life?

What if your finances are unsustainable?

What if your loneliness is real?

What if the situation itself deserves to be called what it is?

Those are important questions.

Because the purpose of changing our perception is never to become blind.

As Carl Winston once said,

“You cannot shave with your eyes closed.”

Closing our eyes doesn’t eliminate the situation.

It only delays our response.

The same is true psychologically.

There are moments when the healthiest thing we can do is acknowledge that something is genuinely wrong.

Not every negative emotion is a cognitive distortion.

Not every difficult circumstance is secretly a blessing waiting to be appreciated.

Sometimes reality is asking something of us.

Recovery taught me this long before I ever became a therapist.

One of the central principles of the Twelve Steps is rigorous honesty.

Not selective honesty.

Not optimistic honesty.

Rigorous honesty.

Recovery doesn’t begin by pretending life is better than it is.

It begins by seeing life accurately enough to change it.

That, I believe, is the point.

The goal of emotional awareness is not positivity.

It is accuracy.

Sometimes accuracy produces gratitude.

Sometimes it produces grief.

Sometimes it produces courage.

Sometimes it produces the realization that a difficult conversation, a new boundary, or a major life change has become necessary.

All are valuable if they are true.

The only thing more dangerous than seeing problems where none exist...

...is refusing to see the ones that do.

A perceptual shift isn’t about making reality prettier.

It’s about making reality clearer.

Only then can we decide what deserves acceptance...

and what deserves change.

Dedication

Dedicated to those who have forgotten that they are living a life they once hoped for.

May you have the courage to see your circumstances honestly, the humility to recognize when familiarity has distorted your perspective, and the wisdom to know when life is asking for gratitude... and when it is asking for change.

Before You Go...

If this article challenged the way you think, I’d love to invite you to become a paid subscriber.

A Perceptual Shift exists because I believe the way we see the world determines the way we live in it. Every week I publish long form essays exploring psychology, philosophy, recovery, relationships, work, and the often uncomfortable realities of personal growth. Paid subscribers receive access to every Afterthoughts section, exclusive essays, and other subscriber only content that goes beyond what I publish publicly.

If you’ve found value in these articles, your subscription does more than unlock additional content. It directly supports independent writing and allows me to continue creating thoughtful, clinically informed work without relying on advertising, algorithms, or clickbait.

If you’re not ready to subscribe, that’s okay.

Keep reading.

Keep questioning.

And above all, keep looking at the world from a different angle.

Sometimes the smallest perceptual shift changes everything.

If you’re a paid subscriber, I’d like to take the conversation one step further.

The articles I publish publicly are intended to introduce an idea. The Afterthoughts are where I wrestle with it. They’re less polished, more personal, and occasionally more confrontational. This week, I’d like to explore two uncomfortable truths that have profoundly shaped the way I think about change, growth, and why so many of us unknowingly organize our lives around avoiding both.

Read more

The older I become, the less convinced I am that life is a series of isolated disappointments.

I wonder if it is more accurately described as a series of poorly managed expectations.

Some of those expectations were handed to me long before I was old enough to question them.

Others I created myself.

As a child, I believed adulthood would provide certainty.

As a student, I believed education would inevitably lead to opportunity.

As someone in recovery, I believed sobriety would solve far more problems than it actually did.

As a husband, father, clinician, and business owner, I’ve often caught myself believing that enough preparation, enough effort, or enough discipline could somehow guarantee particular outcomes.

Life has challenged every one of those assumptions.

Not because the expectations were foolish.

But because they were mine.

And life has never been under any obligation to conform to them.

This article isn’t an argument against hope.

Or planning.

Or ambition.

It is an invitation to examine something much quieter.

The expectations we carry into tomorrow before tomorrow has had any opportunity to introduce itself.

Expectation is a word we use almost every day, yet few of us stop to consider what it actually means.

The English word expectation traces its roots to the Latin expectare, meaning “to look out for,” “to await,” or “to hope for.” At its heart is the verb spectare, meaning “to look” or “to observe.” It is the same linguistic family that gives us words like spectator, inspection, and perspective. Each shares a common thread: directing our attention toward something.

That common thread matters.

To expect is not merely to want something. It is to orient our attention toward a future that has not yet arrived. Expectations ask us to look beyond the present moment toward what we believe, hope, or assume is coming next.

Interestingly, this same family of words also includes speculum, the Latin word for “mirror,” from which we derive terms such as specular and specularis. While not the direct ancestor of expectation, it offers a useful metaphor. Looking is not always directed outward. Sometimes what we look toward reveals something about the one doing the looking.

We often think of expectations as beliefs about the future. I wonder if they are just as often reflections of ourselves.

The expectations we hold rarely emerge from nowhere. They are shaped by our experiences, values, fears, relationships, disappointments, ambitions, and hopes. Before they tell us anything about what tomorrow may bring, they often reveal how we have come to understand ourselves and the world around us.

There is nothing inherently wrong with expectations. In many ways, they are necessary. They allow us to plan, prepare, trust, and cooperate with others. A society without expectations would struggle to function.

Yet hidden within every expectation is a subtle risk.

Every expectation asks us to exchange what is for what we believe will be. Sometimes reality rewards that exchange. Often, it does not.

The distance between those two realities, the one we imagined and the one we eventually encounter, is where disappointment, frustration, resentment, and even suffering often begin.

Perhaps the problem is not that we have expectations.

Perhaps the problem is that we rarely stop to ask what our expectations reveal, not just about the future we hope to encounter, but about ourselves.

We Don’t Simply Predict the Future. We Project Ourselves Into It.

If expectations were simply educated guesses about what might happen next, they would rarely carry such emotional weight.

Instead, expectations often become something much more personal.

We unconsciously project ourselves into a future that does not yet exist. We imagine conversations before they happen. We rehearse victories and defeats before either becomes reality. We decide how someone should respond before they have spoken a word. Long before life unfolds, we have already begun living a version of it within our own minds.

This is one of the remarkable qualities of human consciousness. We possess the extraordinary ability to mentally travel through time. We revisit our past with memory and construct our future with imagination. That capacity has allowed us to build civilizations, plan families, pursue careers, and prepare for uncertainty.

Yet the same gift carries a hidden cost.

The future we imagine is never created in a vacuum.

It is built from the raw materials of our own lives.

Our disappointments become assumptions. Our successes become confidence. Our fears become predictions. Our values become standards by which we judge others. Even our deepest insecurities quietly influence what we come to expect from ourselves, from those around us, and from life itself.

In that sense, expectations are rarely objective forecasts.

They are autobiographies written about tomorrow.

That may explain why two people can enter the very same circumstance and leave with entirely different experiences. The event itself is only part of the story. The expectations each person carried into that event often determine how they interpret what follows.

When reality eventually arrives, it is not merely compared against the facts.

It is compared against the future we had already created in our own minds.

When Reality Meets Imagination

If expectations are projections of ourselves, disappointment begins to look very different.

We often speak as though reality has failed us.

Things weren’t supposed to happen this way.

She wasn’t supposed to leave.

I should have gotten the promotion.

My children should appreciate everything I’ve sacrificed.

This wasn’t the life I imagined.

Yet reality has made no promises.

It has entered into no agreements.

It has signed no contracts.

Reality simply unfolds according to countless variables, many of which exist entirely outside our control.

Our disappointment rarely emerges because reality has broken its word.

It emerges because reality has declined to resemble the future we had already constructed in our minds.

That distinction may seem subtle, but it changes everything.

We often imagine disappointment as something the world gives to us.

More often, disappointment is something created at the intersection of two realities.

The first is the world as it actually exists.

The second is the world as we believed it ought to exist.

The greater the distance between those two worlds, the greater our experience of disappointment tends to become.

This is not to suggest that grief, injustice, or tragedy are merely failures of expectation. They are real, painful experiences that deserve to be acknowledged on their own terms. But many of our everyday frustrations arise from a different source. They are born from the silent negotiations we conduct with a future that never knew we were bargaining with it.

If this is true, then perhaps expectations deserve a different question.

Not whether they are optimistic or pessimistic.

Not whether they are high or low.

But whether they are revealing something about us.

Every expectation begins somewhere.

Why do I expect recognition?

Why do I expect fairness?

Why do I expect perfection from myself?

Why do I expect others to think, behave, or love the way I would?

Perhaps those expectations say less about the future than they do about the beliefs, values, fears, and wounds I carry into it.

In that sense, expectations become mirrors.

Before they reveal anything about tomorrow, they reveal something about the person imagining it.

Every Expectation Has a Source

If expectations are projections of ourselves, then they cannot simply appear from nowhere.

Every expectation has a source.

Some are shaped by our values. Others by our experiences. Still others by our fears, hopes, disappointments, successes, relationships, and countless moments we have long since forgotten. Whether we realize it or not, our minds are constantly constructing an internal model of the world and using that model to anticipate what comes next.

Psychology has offered many ways of understanding this process. Psychodynamic theory suggests that we unconsciously protect ourselves through defense mechanisms developed over the course of our lives. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy describes cognitive distortions, habitual patterns of thinking that influence how we interpret ourselves, other people, and the events around us. Even research on cognitive biases demonstrates that our minds often give disproportionate weight to recent experiences, emotionally significant events, or information that confirms what we already believe.

Although these theories approach the mind from different perspectives, they arrive at a remarkably similar conclusion.

Our expectations are rarely objective.

They are filtered through the lens of our own psychological experience.

A person who has repeatedly experienced betrayal may begin expecting dishonesty where none exists. Someone praised only for achievement may come to expect perfection from themselves in every endeavor. Another who has been consistently encouraged and supported may naturally expect kindness and cooperation from others. None of these expectations emerge in isolation. They are built from the accumulated experiences that quietly shape how we interpret the world.

This is not a flaw unique to a select few. It is a consequence of being human.

Our minds are prediction machines. Every experience, every relationship, every success and disappointment becomes another piece of information from which we attempt to construct an increasingly reliable picture of reality. Expectations are, in many ways, the brain’s attempt to reduce uncertainty before uncertainty ever arrives.

That process serves us remarkably well.

Until it doesn’t.

Because while our experiences may explain why an expectation exists, they cannot guarantee that the future will resemble the past.

The Source Is Not the Truth

If every expectation has a source, then perhaps the most important question we can ask is not, “Is this expectation good or bad?”

Perhaps the better question is, “Where did it come from?”

The answer to that question often deserves compassion.

A person who has been betrayed may naturally expect betrayal.

Someone who grew up walking on eggshells may come to expect criticism.

Someone repeatedly overlooked may expect rejection before they’ve even been evaluated.

Someone consistently encouraged may expect opportunity where others see obstacles.

None of these expectations are irrational.

They are understandable.

Our minds are doing exactly what they were designed to do. They learn from experience, recognize patterns, and attempt to protect us from future harm. In many ways, expectations are evidence that our minds have been paying attention.

But there is an important distinction.

An expectation can have a perfectly understandable source without being an accurate prediction.

The experiences that shaped us deserve to be respected. They do not automatically deserve authority over our future.

That is where many of us quietly become trapped.

We stop asking whether our expectations are describing reality, and instead begin assuming they are reality.

The person who expects rejection withdraws before connection has a chance to develop.

The person who expects criticism hears it even when none was intended.

The person convinced that failure is inevitable hesitates just enough to make failure more likely.

Over time, expectations can begin shaping the very outcomes they anticipated.

Not because they accurately predicted the future.

But because they quietly influenced how we entered it.

This is one of the burdens of expectation.

What begins as an attempt to protect ourselves can eventually become the lens through which we experience everything. Without realizing it, we stop responding to the world as it is and begin responding to the world as we have already imagined it to be.

That is not a moral failure.

It is a profoundly human one.

Which is precisely why it deserves our attention.

Seeing Beyond Ourselves

There is an irony hidden within all of this.

If our expectations are shaped by our own experiences, beliefs, fears, and assumptions, then we are asking the very mind that created the projection to determine whether the projection is accurate.

That is extraordinarily difficult.

We all possess blind spots.

Not because we lack intelligence.

Not because we lack honesty.

But because we cannot easily step outside the perspective from which we are already viewing the world.

This is why meaningful conversations can be so transformative.

Sometimes another person doesn’t give us new answers.

They simply allow us to see our old questions differently.

A trusted friend, mentor, spouse, clergy member, supervisor, or therapist may notice assumptions that have become invisible to us simply because we have carried them for so long. What feels like objective reality to us may look very different through someone else’s eyes.

That is not weakness.

It is one of the great advantages of allowing another perspective to intersect with our own.

Sometimes the greatest perceptual shift does not come from discovering something new.

It comes from finally seeing what has been quietly influencing us all along.

Should We Resist Expectations?

After everything we’ve explored, it would be tempting to conclude that expectations are something we should eliminate altogether.

I don’t think that’s the answer.

Expectations are part of what makes us human.

They allow us to prepare, anticipate, trust, plan, love, and hope. Without expectations, much of human cooperation would become impossible. We expect the sun to rise. We expect those we love to come home. We expect our words to carry meaning and our actions to produce consequences.

Expectation itself is not the problem.

The problem begins when we mistake expectation for certainty.

Or when we allow it to become the only lens through which we interpret reality.

Perhaps, then, resistance is aimed at the wrong target.

The word resist means “to refuse to accept or be changed by something.”

But maybe expectations are not something to resist.

Maybe expectations are invitations.

Every expectation carries information.

It tells us something about what we value.

What we fear.

What we have experienced.

What we hope for.

What we are still trying to protect.

Rather than asking whether an expectation is good or bad, perhaps we should begin asking different questions.

“Why do I expect this?”

“What experiences taught me to believe this?”

“Is this expectation preparing me for reality... or protecting me from my past?”

Those questions transform expectations from invisible assumptions into opportunities for insight.

They become less like rules we must obey and more like data points helping us better understand our own minds.

The expectation itself is no longer the destination.

It becomes the beginning of a conversation.

Expectations will always be part of being human.

We cannot stop imagining tomorrow, nor should we.

But we can become more thoughtful about the stories we tell ourselves before tomorrow arrives.

If expectations are, in part, reflections of who we are, then they deserve neither blind obedience nor complete rejection.

They deserve our curiosity.

For in understanding our expectations, we may discover that we were never learning only about the future.

We were learning about ourselves.

A Final Thought

If you’ve read this far, thank you.

Writing these articles takes considerably more time than most people probably realize. Researching ideas, organizing thoughts, writing, revising, and editing has become one of the most rewarding parts of A Perceptual Shift, and I hope these essays continue to encourage thoughtful conversations long after they’re published.

If you find value in this work and would like to support it, there are a few ways you can help.

Becoming a paid subscriber helps make future writing possible.

If you’d simply like to leave a tip, you can do so via Venmo: @APerceptualShift.

Perhaps the most meaningful support, however, costs nothing.

If you know someone who might benefit from this article, share it with them. Send it to a friend, a family member, a colleague, or anyone you think might find something worthwhile in it.

Thoughtful conversations have a way of traveling farther than we ever expect.

Thank you for reading.

Matthew Breiner, MSW, LCSW, MBA
Owner of A Perceptual Shift

The ideas we’ve explored throughout this article are, at least to me, more than philosophical exercises.

They have become deeply personal questions.

Questions I’ve found myself revisiting throughout different seasons of my own life, often without recognizing them for what they were at the time.

Before ending, I’d like to leave the role of author for a moment and simply speak as another person trying to make sense of the expectations I’ve carried.

Epilogue

When I look back over my own life, I can see a pattern I didn’t recognize while I was living it.

There was always a next thing.

Finish high school.

Earn a bachelor’s degree.

Then another.

Complete a master’s.

Then another.

Find the right career.

Advance professionally.

Start a business.

Grow the business.

Reach the next milestone.

Acquire the next credential.

Accomplish the next goal.

None of those pursuits were wrong.

Many of them became some of the greatest privileges of my life.

But somewhere along the way, I quietly began believing that fulfillment was always waiting just beyond whatever came next.

I became remarkably good at living in the future.

The irony, of course, is that by the time I arrived at many of the places I had spent years imagining, I had already begun looking toward the next destination.

The accomplishment was real.

The satisfaction was fleeting.

The expectation remained.

Looking back, I don’t regret pursuing meaningful goals.

I regret how often those goals distracted me from the life that was unfolding while I was pursuing them.

Perhaps that is the true burden of expectations.

Not merely that they sometimes disappoint us.

But that they can quietly convince us that peace always exists somewhere other than where we are.

I don’t believe the answer is to abandon ambition.

Or to stop planning.

Or to stop hoping.

I believe the answer is something much more difficult.

To recognize our expectations for what they are.

Not promises.

Not guarantees.

Not reality.

Simply stories we are telling ourselves about a future that has not yet arrived.

Some of those stories will become true.

Many will not.

Either way, life will continue inviting us back to the only place it has ever actually existed.

The present moment.

Perhaps expectations are best held lightly.

Not because they lack value.

But because they were never meant to carry the weight of our peace.

Dedication

It is with a certain sense of irony that I dedicate this article to those who have held the highest expectations of me throughout my life.

To my parents, family, teachers, coaches, mentors, supervisors, colleagues, friends, and even those who expected more of me than I believed I was capable of giving.

Those expectations were not mistakes.

Nor were they without benefit.

Many challenged me to grow in ways I never would have pursued on my own. They encouraged discipline, resilience, curiosity, perseverance, and a willingness to strive toward something greater than comfort alone. Much of who I am today was forged in response to those expectations.

For that, I am sincerely grateful.

At the same time, expectations, whether placed upon us by others or quietly adopted as our own, carry weight. Sometimes they inspire us. Sometimes they motivate us. And sometimes, almost without our noticing, they begin shaping how we measure our worth, interpret our circumstances, and imagine our future.

This article is not an argument against high expectations.

It is an invitation to understand them more deeply.

To those who believed in me before I believed in myself, thank you.

And to anyone who has ever found themselves carrying expectations so heavy that they obscured the present moment, I hope these reflections offer another way of seeing.

I love you.

I love you all.

One Last Thought...

Everything above represents what I currently believe about expectations.

Everything below represents where I still struggle.

Read more

That sentence probably made you uncomfortable.

Good.

It was supposed to.

Nearly every one of us has spent our lives hearing exactly the opposite. Parents tell us to do our best. Teachers tell us to do our best. Coaches tell us to do our best. Employers tell us to do our best. We tell our children to do their best.

It’s one of the least controversial pieces of advice in our culture.

I think we’ve misunderstood it completely.

“Just do your best.”

The phrase is almost universally accepted as good advice.

I’ve begun to wonder if it deserves a second look.

Not because effort isn’t important. It is.

But because somewhere along the way, doing your best became confused with giving everything you have, every single day, in every single circumstance.

That isn’t wisdom.

It’s exhaustion waiting to happen.

The Impossible Standard

Imagine going to the gym with one rule:

Every exercise must be performed with the maximum amount of weight you can possibly lift.

Every set to failure.

Every workout.

No exceptions.

You wouldn’t become stronger.

You’d become injured.

Ironically, the people who understand strength training the best almost never train this way. Elite athletes manage effort. They understand recovery. They know when to push and when to hold something back because they understand that performance isn’t measured by a single workout. It’s measured over months and years.

Life works the same way.

Yet many of us expect ourselves to approach every conversation, every work assignment, every parenting decision, every household chore, and every relationship with maximum effort.

We would never train our bodies this way.

Why do we train our lives this way?

Michelin Star Expectations

Imagine preparing every meal as though inspectors from a Michelin Guide were about to arrive.

Every ingredient perfectly sourced.

Every sauce homemade.

Every plate beautifully presented.

Every meal unforgettable.

It’s absurd.

Some nights dinner is elaborate.

Some nights dinner is leftovers.

Some nights dinner is cereal because you’ve had a difficult day.

None of those meals make you a better or worse person.

They’re simply different responses to different circumstances.

Yet somehow we expect our lives to be Michelin star performances from the moment we wake up until the moment we fall asleep.

Every email.

Every meeting.

Every workout.

Every interaction.

Everything deserves our absolute best.

Nothing can sustain that.

We Confuse Effort With Virtue

This may be the most dangerous misunderstanding of all.

Somewhere along the way we began believing that the harder someone appears to work, the better they must be.

But effort and virtue are not the same thing.

Sometimes extraordinary effort reflects discipline.

Sometimes it reflects passion.

Sometimes it reflects genuine commitment.

And sometimes it reflects fear.

Fear of disappointing someone.

Fear of not being enough.

Fear of slowing down.

Fear that if we stop producing, people might discover we’re ordinary.

Psychologists have long recognized that perfectionism often isn’t about excellence at all. It is frequently rooted in anxiety, insecurity, or a belief that love, acceptance, or worth must be earned through performance.

The person staying three hours late every evening may be deeply committed.

Or they may believe they have no value unless they are indispensable.

The parent who never rests may be extraordinarily devoted.

Or they may be terrified of making a mistake.

From the outside, those two people look exactly the same.

The motivation makes all the difference.

Effort, by itself, isn’t evidence of psychological health.

Sometimes it is evidence that something deeper is hurting.

Your Best Is Not a Fixed Number

One of the greatest flaws in the phrase “do your best” is the assumption that your best is constant.

It isn’t.

The best of someone who slept eight hours isn’t the same as the best of someone who spent the night comforting a sick child.

The best of someone grieving isn’t the same as the best of someone celebrating.

The best of someone recovering from depression isn’t the same as the best of someone at the peak of their health.

Human beings are not machines.

Our capacities fluctuate.

Our energy changes.

Our circumstances matter.

Holding yourself to yesterday’s standard when today’s reality is different isn’t discipline.

It’s self-punishment.

The Mathematics of Energy

Every day you wake up with limited resources.

Time.

Attention.

Emotional capacity.

Physical energy.

Every ounce you spend somewhere cannot be spent somewhere else.

This is true financially.

We understand that if we spend every dollar we have today, tomorrow becomes much more difficult.

Yet many of us attempt exactly that with our emotional lives.

We spend every ounce of ourselves before noon.

Then we wonder why we have nothing left for our spouse.

Our children.

Our friends.

Ourselves.

Sustainability isn’t laziness.

It’s stewardship.

A Better Question

Perhaps we’ve been asking the wrong question all along.

Instead of asking:

“Did I do my best?”

Maybe we should ask:

“Did I give this moment what it actually required?”

Some moments deserve everything you’ve got.

A medical emergency.

A difficult conversation.

Protecting someone you love.

A meaningful opportunity that may never come again.

Other moments simply require competence.

Not brilliance.

Not perfection.

Just enough.

Knowing the difference isn’t laziness.

It’s wisdom.

The Irony

Ironically, people who insist on giving one hundred percent to everything usually discover they have nothing left when life finally asks for one hundred percent.

The parent who never rests eventually burns out.

The employee who never stops eventually loses perspective.

The perfectionist eventually becomes paralyzed.

The person who refuses to recover eventually has recovery chosen for them.

Your life was never designed to be one continuous sprint.

It was designed to be lived.

Perhaps the greatest act of maturity is realizing that your value has never depended on maximizing every moment.

You do not become a better person because you exhaust yourself.

You become a wiser person when you learn what is worthy of your fullest effort, and when you have the courage to let the rest simply be enough.

Shameless Plug

If you’ve followed my writing for any length of time, you’ve probably noticed that these articles aren’t really about productivity, psychology, relationships, or even philosophy.

They’re about perspective.

More specifically, they’re about the subtle assumptions we carry through life without ever stopping to examine them.

That is exactly what counseling often looks like.

Very few people come into therapy because they don’t know what they’re doing.

Most already know.

They’re exhausted because they don’t understand why they keep doing it.

Together we examine the stories, beliefs, and expectations that quietly shape decisions long before we’re aware we’re making them.

Sometimes the greatest change doesn’t come from working harder.

Sometimes it comes from seeing the same life through an entirely different lens.

If you’re a Pennsylvania resident and have been considering counseling, I’d be honored to be part of that conversation.

A Perceptual Shift

Advocacy. Purpose. Sustainability.

For clinicians. For systems. For you.

www.aperceptualshift.com

info@aperceptualshift.com

What follows isn’t really part of the article.

It’s simply where my mind wandered after writing it.

Epilogue

Writing has become a strange experience for me.

By the time I finish an article, I often sit in silence for a while, almost detached from what I’ve just written. Most of these essays begin with an observation about the world, but if I’m being honest, they’re usually about me.

This one certainly was.

The idea of “doing my best” has occupied more of my life than I’d like to admit. In fact, it kept me awake the night before I finally decided to write this article.

For most of my life, I believed marriage deserved my best. My children deserved my best. My career deserved my best. My friendships deserved my best.

Maybe they do.

But I hope I’ve made the case that “our best” is less about perpetual maximum effort and more about knowing how to regulate ourselves well enough to still have something left tomorrow.

I’ve trusted effort for as long as I can remember.

If I just... God, I feel embarrassed even saying it... did my best, everything would somehow work itself out.

Maybe even more delusionally, I believed that doing my best would make things work out in my favor.

Forty-one years have offered a different lesson.

I’ve poured an incredible amount of effort into my career.

I still don’t own a Porsche.

I’ve poured an incredible amount of effort into my marriage and raising my children.

Neither is perfect.

I’ve poured tremendous effort into countless goals that never materialized the way I imagined.

After forty-one years of seeing the same evidence over and over again, you’d think I would have learned that effort and outcomes aren’t the same thing.

Apparently I haven’t.

And I’m increasingly convinced that most of us haven’t.

I went to college with a guy named Tim.

Tim was one of the funnier people I’ve ever met.

His signature move on Facebook was commenting one word beneath almost everyone’s posts.

“So?”

Someone got engaged.

“So?”

Someone had a baby.

“So?”

Someone landed their dream job.

“So?”

Someone lost a loved one.

“So?”

It didn’t matter what someone posted.

“So?”

For some reason, that has lived rent-free in my head for nearly twenty years.

I’ve been thinking about Tim throughout this entire article.

Because eventually every belief has to survive one simple question.

I did my best...

So?

That question isn’t meant to diminish effort.

It’s meant to reveal whether effort was ever the point.

If your answer is simply, “Because that’s what good people do,” I’d encourage you to think a little deeper.

Effort matters.

Discipline matters.

Character matters.

But effort alone does not define us.

So what does?

That’s a much harder question.

If someone forced me to answer, I’d probably say this:

We are defined by our ability to match our ambitions to our abilities.

We are defined by our capacity to regulate ourselves instead of simply exhausting ourselves.

We are defined by our willingness to acknowledge our limitations without allowing them to become excuses.

And perhaps most importantly, we are defined by our ability to find peace with the fact that being human has never required perfection.

Not because our shortcomings don’t matter.

But because they were never the exception.

They’ve always been part of the deal.

What defines us?

Ultimately...

We do.

I love you.

I love you all.

I truly do.

Take care of yourselves.

Dedication

At the risk of sounding ironic, I’d like to dedicate this article to the people in my life who encouraged me to do my best.

They weren’t wrong.

They were trying to teach discipline, responsibility, perseverance, and pride in one’s work. They were trying to prepare me for a world that rarely rewards indifference. Those are lessons worth passing on.

If I’ve challenged the phrase throughout this article, it isn’t because I’ve stopped believing in effort. It’s because I’ve come to believe that effort without wisdom eventually becomes exhaustion.

High standards are a privilege.

Responsibility is a privilege.

Consequences are a privilege.

Even the problems we spend so much time wishing away are often evidence that we’ve been entrusted with something meaningful to lose.

A difficult marriage means someone chose to love you.

The stress of raising children means you’ve been given the opportunity to shape a life beyond your own.

The pressure of meaningful work means someone believes your contribution matters.

Those burdens aren’t punishments.

They’re signs that life has asked something of you.

May we continue to strive for excellence, but may we also learn that excellence isn’t measured by how completely we exhaust ourselves.

Sometimes the wisest thing we can do isn’t to give more.

It’s to recognize that enough can also be an act of love.

Continue Reading...

The article ends here.

The conversation doesn’t.

For paid subscribers, I always include what I call Afterthoughts.

They’re less polished, more personal, and often where I wrestle with the parts of an idea that don’t neatly fit into the article itself. Sometimes they reinforce the argument. Sometimes they challenge it. More often than not, they’re simply where I think out loud.

Today, I want to explore the difference between maximum effort and misplaced effort, why extraordinary lives rarely look balanced while they’re being built, and one lesson I’ve learned from people who knew they were nearing the end of theirs.

If you’d like to continue the conversation, I’d love to have you there.

Read more

“I see you’re in a hurry to get some place... it’s a great mistake to hurry... because the grave is our destination and those who hurry normally get there sooner.”

Larry McMurtry, Lonesome Dove

When I first read those words, I laughed.

Then I stopped laughing.

Like many great quotes, its brilliance isn’t immediately obvious. It sneaks up on you. At first, it feels like the dry humor of an old cowboy. A clever observation about life. But if you allow yourself to sit with it for a while, something deeper begins to emerge.

The destination has never been the question.

Every single one of us is headed toward the same inevitable conclusion. Rich or poor. Healthy or sick. Successful or forgotten. We all spend our lives moving toward the same finish line.

The only variable is how we choose to make the journey.

Modern life seems intent on convincing us that faster is always better.

Faster internet.

Faster food.

Faster shipping.

Faster promotions.

Faster responses.

Faster results.

Even when we have nowhere particularly important to be, we hurry. We speed through grocery stores. We become impatient sitting at red lights. We walk while checking emails. We eat meals standing over the kitchen counter. We interrupt one another because waiting another three seconds feels unbearable. We proudly describe ourselves as “busy,” as though exhaustion has somehow become evidence of significance.

It has become so commonplace that we rarely question it.

We simply assume that movement is progress.

I’m no exception.

For much of my life, I wore busyness like a badge of honor. The more responsibilities I accumulated, the more successful I believed myself to be. Graduate school. Hospital social work. Building a business. Raising a family. Writing every week. Exercising before sunrise. Reading one more book. Learning one more skill. Accomplishing one more task.

There was always another mountain waiting behind the one I’d just climbed.

And if I’m being completely honest, there still is.

Somewhere along the way, however, I began noticing something peculiar.

The people I admired most rarely seemed rushed.

The best therapists I’ve ever worked alongside weren’t frantic.

They were patient.

The strongest musicians I know don’t appear hurried.

They appear deliberate.

The most respected physicians I’ve encountered don’t sprint from room to room in a panic.

They move with intention.

The same could be said of exceptional teachers. Skilled craftsmen. Experienced pilots. Elite athletes. Loving parents.

From a distance, they almost appear slow.

Until you realize they’re accomplishing more than everyone around them.

That observation forced me to confront an uncomfortable possibility.

What if rushing isn’t making us more productive at all?

What if it’s making us careless?

We celebrate multitasking despite overwhelming evidence that our attention suffers when it’s divided. We schedule every available minute because empty space feels unproductive. We fill silence with podcasts. Waiting rooms with social media. Car rides with phone calls. Walks with emails.

We’ve become profoundly uncomfortable with stillness.

Perhaps because stillness forces us into the one place many of us spend our lives trying to avoid:

Our own thoughts.

As a therapist, I’ve become increasingly convinced that many people aren’t exhausted because they’re doing meaningful work.

They’re exhausted because they never stop moving long enough to ask whether the work they’re doing is actually meaningful.

There is an important distinction.

Motion creates the feeling of accomplishment.

Reflection determines whether we’re moving in the right direction.

One burns calories.

The other changes lives.

I have come to believe that slowing down is one of the most misunderstood forms of self-care.

Not because slowing down feels good.

Quite often, it doesn’t.

In fact, the first thing many people encounter when they finally become still isn’t peace.

It’s anxiety.

Grief.

Loneliness.

Regret.

Questions they’ve successfully outrun for years.

Silence has a way of introducing us to ourselves.

Perhaps that’s why we avoid it.

Yet nearly every meaningful thing I’ve ever learned required me to slow down first.

Recovery demanded it.

Fatherhood demanded it.

Learning guitar demanded it.

Building relationships demanded it.

Counseling others demands it every single day.

Ironically, slowing down has made me think faster, listen more carefully, make better decisions, and notice things I would have otherwise missed had I continued rushing toward a destination that was never moving.

Perhaps Larry McMurtry was right.

The grave isn’t going anywhere.

Maybe the greatest mistake isn’t that we die.

Maybe it’s that we spend so much of our lives hurrying toward tomorrow that we forget to experience today.

Movement Isn’t Progress

One of the greatest misconceptions of modern life is the belief that movement and progress are synonymous.

They aren’t.

Movement simply means you’ve changed locations.

Progress means you’ve changed conditions.

Those are very different things.

You can spend an entire day moving.

Answering emails.

Attending meetings.

Running errands.

Responding to text messages.

Scrolling social media.

Cleaning the house.

Driving from one obligation to the next.

By the end of the day, you’re exhausted.

Yet if someone asked what meaningful progress had been made, many of us would struggle to answer.

We confuse activity with achievement because activity is easy to measure.

It’s visible.

It’s immediate.

It gives us the comforting illusion that we’re accomplishing something.

Progress is much quieter.

It often looks unimpressive in the moment.

A father sitting on the floor building Legos with his son doesn’t appear productive.

A husband taking an uninterrupted walk with his wife doesn’t seem efficient.

A musician playing the same four measures repeatedly at half speed appears to be moving backward.

A therapist sitting silently while a client gathers the courage to finish a sentence may look as though nothing is happening.

Appearances can be remarkably deceptive.

Some of the most important moments of our lives are almost entirely absent of movement.

The difficult conversation.

The decision to forgive.

The moment we finally admit we need help.

The realization that we’ve been chasing the wrong things.

The prayer whispered in complete silence.

None of those moments would impress an outside observer.

Every one of them has the potential to change a life.

I wonder if our obsession with movement stems from something much deeper.

Movement distracts us.

Reflection confronts us.

As long as we’re busy, we don’t have to wrestle with uncomfortable questions.

Am I becoming the person I hoped I would become?

Do I actually enjoy the life I’ve built?

When was the last time I sat with my own thoughts without reaching for my phone?

Who am I trying so desperately to impress?

What if the pace I’ve normalized is quietly costing me the very life I’m trying to build?

Those questions don’t usually arise while we’re rushing.

They appear in the stillness.

Perhaps that’s why we work so hard to avoid it.

We tell ourselves we’ll slow down after the promotion.

After the kids get older.

After the mortgage is paid.

After retirement.

After the next project.

After this busy season.

But life has a remarkable way of replacing one busy season with another.

The destination keeps moving.

We don’t notice that years have passed because we’ve been too occupied looking at our calendars to look at our lives.

Perhaps the greatest irony is this:

Why the Brain Rushes

If you’ve made it this far, you might be tempted to conclude that our hurried existence is simply the result of poor priorities or a lack of discipline.

I don’t think that’s true.

In fact, I think your brain deserves far more credit than it usually receives.

It isn’t rushing because it’s broken.

It’s rushing because, for hundreds of thousands of years, rushing often kept us alive.

Long before calendars, smartphones, deadlines, and overflowing inboxes, our ancestors faced a very different set of problems.

Was that movement in the bushes the wind...

...or a predator?

Could another tribe be approaching?

Would there be enough food to survive the winter?

Was that unfamiliar plant nourishment or poison?

Those who responded quickly to potential danger were more likely to survive than those who spent too much time contemplating every possibility.

Nature has always favored survival over comfort.

Your brain reflects that priority.

To this day, it is remarkably efficient at asking one question:

“What could go wrong?”

There is a reason for that.

Missing one genuine threat carried enormous consequences.

Missing one beautiful sunset did not.

Evolution shaped a brain that constantly scans for problems because problems, left unnoticed, had the potential to become fatal.

In many ways, anxiety is the cognitive expression of that ancient survival strategy.

It asks us to anticipate.

To prepare.

To predict.

To stay one step ahead of danger.

The problem is that our environment has changed dramatically.

The threats confronting most of us today are rarely lions, famine, or invading tribes.

Instead, they’re performance reviews.

Mortgage payments.

Medical test results.

Social rejection.

Parenting decisions.

Career changes.

Financial uncertainty.

These threats are psychologically significant, but they differ in one crucial respect.

They usually cannot be solved immediately.

A predator either attacks or it doesn’t.

A job interview may not happen for three weeks.

Medical results may take days.

College acceptance letters arrive months later.

A difficult conversation with your spouse might not occur until tonight.

Yet your brain treats uncertainty much the same way it once treated immediate physical danger.

It prepares.

It rehearses.

It imagines.

It predicts.

What if I fail?

What if they leave?

What if I’m not enough?

What if I made the wrong decision?

What if something terrible happens?

The irony is almost heartbreaking.

The very organ attempting to protect us often becomes the source of our suffering.

Not because it’s malfunctioning.

Because it’s attempting to solve a problem that has no immediate solution.

The future refuses to be controlled.

And yet the brain keeps trying.

Perhaps that explains why rushing feels so natural.

We hurry because our minds confuse speed with safety.

If I answer the email quickly...

If I make the decision immediately...

If I keep working...

If I stay busy...

If I think about it just a little longer...

Maybe I’ll finally feel in control.

But control is a curious thing.

The harder we chase it, the more elusive it becomes.

Because many of the things we worry about were never ours to control in the first place.

The future.

Other people.

Time.

Health.

Outcomes.

Death.

Our minds continue negotiating with uncertainty, hoping that enough preparation will eventually purchase certainty.

It never does.

Which raises an important question.

If our brains are naturally inclined to rush...

How do the wisest, calmest, and most effective people appear so remarkably unhurried?

The Pause

By now you might be wondering whether I’m suggesting we all move to the mountains, abandon our calendars, and spend our afternoons watching clouds drift across the sky.

I’m not.

The world is unlikely to slow down.

Technology certainly won’t.

Your responsibilities probably won’t either.

The question, then, isn’t whether life will continue demanding your attention.

It will.

The question is whether you have developed the ability to choose where your attention goes.

For me, nearly every meaningful change I’ve experienced has begun with one simple practice.

The pause.

Not a weeklong vacation.

Not a silent retreat.

Not meditation on a mountaintop.

Just a pause.

A deliberate interruption between what happens to me and how I choose to respond.

That pause is often remarkably brief.

Sometimes it’s a single breath.

Sometimes it’s ten seconds.

Occasionally it’s a walk around the block before answering an email I’d later regret sending.

Other times it’s choosing to sleep on an important decision instead of convincing myself everything requires an answer tonight.

The pause creates something incredibly valuable.

Space.

And within that space exists something we rarely give ourselves.

Choice.

Most of us don’t actually make as many decisions as we believe.

We react.

Someone criticizes us.

We defend ourselves.

Traffic slows.

We become irritated.

An email arrives.

We immediately respond.

A family member disappoints us.

We replay the conversation for the rest of the day.

None of those moments required a decision.

They required awareness.

There is an old saying, often attributed to Viktor Frankl:

“Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response.”

Whether or not you’ve heard the quote before, I think it captures something profoundly important.

The quality of our lives is determined less by what happens to us than by what we repeatedly choose to do in that space.

Unfortunately, rushing tends to eliminate it.

When we hurry, everything becomes immediate.

Every inconvenience becomes an emergency.

Every email deserves an instant reply.

Every disagreement demands resolution.

Every uncomfortable feeling must be escaped.

We stop responding.

We start reacting.

That distinction matters.

Reaction is automatic.

Response is intentional.

The difference between the two is often only a few seconds.

So I’d encourage you to try something this week.

Not something dramatic.

Something almost embarrassingly small.

Before responding to the next frustrating email...

Pause.

Before correcting your child...

Pause.

Before assuming someone’s intentions...

Pause.

Before making an important purchase...

Pause.

Before saying yes...

Pause.

Before saying no...

Pause.

Ask yourself three simple questions.

Is this actually urgent?

Is this actually important?

Will this decision still matter a year from now?

You might be surprised how many situations lose their urgency after thirty seconds of honest reflection.

I suspect you’ll discover something else as well.

Slowing down doesn’t cause you to accomplish less.

It causes you to accomplish fewer things that don’t matter.

There is a profound difference.

The world will continue rewarding speed.

Your inbox certainly will.

Your phone will continue vibrating.

Tomorrow’s calendar will almost certainly fill itself.

The invitation isn’t to reject modern life.

It’s to refuse becoming enslaved by its pace.

Because eventually you’ll discover what every truly exceptional musician, physician, therapist, athlete, parent, and craftsman already knows.

The goal was never to move slowly.

The goal was to move deliberately.

And those are not the same thing.

Perhaps Larry McMurtry understood something we’ve forgotten.

The grave is not waiting because we moved too slowly.

It is waiting because time moves exactly as it always has.

The question has never been how quickly we arrive.

The question is whether we were paying attention while we were here.

An Invitation

One of the unexpected gifts counseling offers has very little to do with advice.

In fact, I spend remarkably little time telling people what they should do.

Instead, counseling creates something that has become increasingly rare in modern life.

Space.

Space to think.

Space to speak without interruption.

Space to ask difficult questions.

Space to notice patterns that have quietly shaped years of our lives.

Most importantly, space to pause.

I’ve often wondered if that pause is what many people are actually searching for.

Not another productivity system.

Not another motivational speaker.

Not another book promising to transform their lives in seven easy steps.

Just permission to slow down long enough to hear themselves think again.

At A Perceptual Shift, my approach to counseling is intentionally short-term and goal-directed.

Together, we identify meaningful goals, develop practical strategies, and measure progress along the way.

The objective isn’t simply to feel better.

It’s to live more deliberately.

To respond rather than react.

To align your daily actions with the person you’re trying to become.

Sometimes that work involves anxiety.

Sometimes relationships.

Sometimes self-esteem.

Sometimes grief.

Sometimes simply acknowledging that the pace you’ve been living is no longer sustainable.

Whatever brings you through the door, the invitation remains the same.

Slow down.

Not because life has become less important.

Because it has always been more important than we’ve allowed ourselves to notice.

If today’s article resonated with you, if you recognized yourself somewhere in these pages, perhaps it’s worth giving yourself something many people never do.

An uninterrupted hour.

Not to produce.

Not to perform.

Not to prove anything.

Just to think.

Sometimes that’s where the real work begins.

Learn more about counseling, clinical supervision, and A Perceptual Shift:

www.aperceptualshift.com

Everything I’ve written to this point has been an attempt to explain why I believe we rush.

The remainder of this essay is my attempt to explain why I’ve spent so much of my own life doing exactly that.

It’s a reflection on addiction, urgency, fatherhood, purpose, and the ongoing challenge of living deliberately in a world that rewards constant movement.

Epilogue

I’d be lying if I told you I’ve mastered what I’ve just written about.

Quite the opposite.

For as long as I can remember, my mind has moved at a pace that my body has struggled to match. Even as a child, I was rarely still. My thoughts arrived faster than I could process them, my curiosity carried me from one idea to the next, and there was always the subtle feeling that I should already be somewhere else doing something more important.

If I’m being completely honest, there was a period of my life when drugs seemed to quiet all of that.

Or at least I thought they did.

Looking back, they didn’t slow my life down at all.

They simply gave me something new to rush toward.

Every day became organized around obtaining, using, recovering, and repeating the process. Whatever temporary stillness they appeared to provide was an illusion. Addiction didn’t eliminate urgency.

It hijacked it.

Ironically, part of me still believes that more people should hurry.

Not in the way we’ve discussed throughout this essay, but with regard to the things that truly matter.

Tell people you love them.

Start the business.

Write the book.

Ask for forgiveness.

Take the trip.

Call your parents.

Apply for the job.

Begin recovery.

Far too many people spend years carefully preparing for lives they never actually begin living.

The grave doesn’t only remind us to slow down.

It reminds us that time is finite.

I suppose that’s the tension I’ve been wrestling with while writing this essay.

Life requires urgency.

Children need to be picked up.

Bills need to be paid.

Work has deadlines.

Responsibilities don’t disappear simply because we’ve decided to become more mindful.

The answer, then, isn’t eliminating hurry.

It’s deciding what deserves it.

I’ve come to believe that rushing is only as worthwhile as the destination toward which you’re running.

If your pace is carrying you toward a stronger marriage, deeper friendships, meaningful work, better health, or becoming the parent your child deserves, perhaps the urgency is justified.

If it’s carrying you toward another unnecessary meeting, another hour of scrolling, another distraction from the questions you’ve been avoiding, perhaps it’s time to slow down long enough to reconsider your direction.

Deliberateness is far more difficult than rushing.

Rushing often excuses us from responsibility.

“I’ve just been so busy.”

“I haven’t had the time.”

“I’ve been overwhelmed.”

Sometimes those statements are undeniably true.

Sometimes they’re convenient.

Deliberateness removes those places to hide.

It asks us to choose.

It asks us to own those choices.

It asks us to accept that every yes is also a no to something else.

That can be an uncomfortable way to live.

It’s also an honest one.

More than anything, that’s what I’ve been trying to practice.

With my wife.

With my son.

With A Perceptual Shift.

With my work.

With my faith.

With the limited number of years I’ve been given.

Not moving slower for the sake of moving slower.

But becoming intentional enough to recognize the rare, quiet moments that make a life worth remembering.

Because perhaps the measure of a life was never how quickly we arrived.

Perhaps it was whether we were awake enough to notice we were living it while it was happening.

Dedication

I’d like to dedicate this essay to those who, despite living deliberately, never made it to the destination they were working toward.

To those who planned carefully.

Loved deeply.

Worked honestly.

Dreamed courageously.

And still had their lives interrupted far sooner than anyone thought they should.

Life is unfair like that.

It does not always reward preparation.

It does not always honor good intentions.

It rarely consults our calendars.

If this essay has taught me anything while writing it, it’s that slowing down is never a guarantee of tomorrow.

It’s simply our best chance to experience today.

This is for those whose journeys ended before they ever had the opportunity to see where the road would have taken them.

May we honor them not by rushing through the lives we’ve been given...

...but by paying closer attention to them.

I love you.

I love you all.

Up to this point, this essay has explored the psychology of rushing, attention, and intentional living.

What follows is considerably more personal.

It’s a reflection on control, uncertainty, and the questions that continue occupying my own mind long after I’ve finished helping others make sense of theirs.

Perhaps the best way to explain these ideas is simply to tell you where I learned them.

Read more

Almost everyone I know who is genuinely good at what they do has wondered whether they belong there.

One of the most common experiences I encounter, both professionally and personally, is imposter syndrome.

A talented clinician questions whether they’re competent enough to help clients.

A new supervisor wonders if they deserve to lead others.

A business owner worries they’ll be exposed as someone who has no idea what they’re doing.

A parent lies awake at night wondering whether they’re screwing everything up.

A student earns a degree and immediately becomes convinced that everyone else knows more than they do.

Different people.

Different circumstances.

Same fear.

Sooner or later, they’re going to find out I’m not supposed to be here.

For something so common, imposter syndrome is remarkably misunderstood.

Most discussions focus on reassurance.

You’re qualified.

You’re capable.

You deserve to be here.

While those statements are often true, they rarely solve the problem.

Because imposter syndrome is not usually a problem of evidence.

Your Identity Is Running Behind Reality

Most people assume that once they accomplish something meaningful, their confidence will automatically increase.

Graduate from college and you’ll feel educated.

Earn the promotion and you’ll feel competent.

Become a therapist and you’ll feel like a therapist.

Become a parent and you’ll feel like an adult.

Start a business and you’ll feel like an entrepreneur.

Unfortunately, life doesn’t work that way.

Reality often changes long before identity does.

You earn the degree.

You obtain the license.

You get the position.

You start seeing clients.

You launch the business.

And yet internally, you still feel like the person you were before.

The student still sees a student.

The employee still sees an employee.

The aspiring writer still sees someone who occasionally writes.

The recovering addict still sees an addict.

The newly licensed clinician still sees an intern.

The problem is not that reality hasn’t changed.

The problem is that your self-concept hasn’t caught up.

The Dunning-Kruger Problem Nobody Talks About

Ironically, the people most likely to experience imposter syndrome are often among the most capable.

Why?

Because competence increases awareness.

The more you learn about a subject, the more aware you become of everything you don’t know.

A first-year social work student may feel surprisingly confident.

A seasoned clinician often feels humbled by the complexity of human behavior.

A beginner guitarist may believe they’re progressing rapidly.

An experienced musician recognizes how much mastery remains.

A new investor may think they’ve figured out the market.

A veteran investor understands uncertainty.

Knowledge expands awareness.

Awareness often reduces certainty.

As a result, highly competent people sometimes interpret healthy humility as evidence of inadequacy.

It isn’t.

You’re Comparing the Wrong Things

Another contributor to imposter syndrome is the comparison itself.

Most people compare their internal experience to everyone else’s external presentation.

You know your doubts.

You know your insecurities.

You know your mistakes.

You know every awkward conversation, every missed opportunity, and every moment of uncertainty.

You do not know those things about anyone else.

You see their confidence.

You don’t see their anxiety.

You see their success.

You don’t see their fear.

You see the presentation.

You don’t see the preparation.

The comparison is fundamentally unfair.

You are comparing your backstage experience to everyone else’s highlight reel.

Nobody wins that game.

Confidence Is Often the Result, Not the Requirement

This is perhaps the most important lesson.

They wait until they feel ready.

Ready to apply.

Ready to lead.

Ready to start.

Ready to publish.

Ready to speak up.

Ready to change careers.

Ready to ask someone out.

Ready to begin.

The problem is that confidence is rarely the prerequisite.

Confidence is usually the outcome.

You become confident by doing the thing.

Not before.

A therapist develops confidence by seeing clients.

A writer develops confidence by writing.

A business owner develops confidence by making decisions.

A public speaker develops confidence by speaking publicly.

A parent develops confidence by parenting.

Action creates evidence.

Evidence creates confidence.

Waiting for confidence before acting often means waiting forever.

An Operational Approach to Imposter Syndrome

If you struggle with imposter syndrome, consider asking yourself three questions.

First:

“What objective evidence exists that I am incapable?”

Not feelings.

Not fears.

Evidence.

Second:

“Am I inexperienced or am I actually incompetent?”

Those are very different things.

Most people confuse the discomfort of being new with proof that they are inadequate.

Third:

“Would I judge someone else this harshly?”

The answer is usually no.

Most people extend significantly more compassion to others than they do to themselves.

Perhaps it is time to offer yourself the same courtesy.

A Brief Shameless Plug

This is one of the reasons I enjoy counseling and clinical supervision.

Many people seek help because they believe they have a motivation problem, a confidence problem, or a self-esteem problem.

Often they have an interpretation problem.

They are mislabeling normal discomfort as failure.

They are misinterpreting growth as evidence they don’t belong.

They are waiting for certainty that never arrives.

Sometimes a perceptual shift changes everything.

If you’re struggling with anxiety, self-doubt, life transitions, career decisions, or feeling stuck, counseling may help.

Likewise, if you’re a Pennsylvania LSW pursuing clinical licensure, supervision provides an opportunity not only to develop your clinical skills but also to challenge the beliefs that often interfere with professional growth.

You can learn more about both through A Perceptual Shift.

Perhaps imposter syndrome isn’t a confidence problem at all.

Perhaps it’s a perceptual one.

Perhaps the greatest deception isn’t that other people see us as more capable than we are.

Perhaps it’s that we continue seeing ourselves as someone we’ve already outgrown.

The remainder of this article is a personal reflection on that idea and the lessons I’ve learned through recovery, social work, entrepreneurship, and nearly two decades of becoming whoever the moment required.

Somewhere along the way, I realized that growth doesn’t only require changing your life.

Sometimes it requires changing the way you see yourself.

Read more

^{-CT Fletcher}

I have spent most of my life obsessed.

Not in the way we usually use the word. Not in a destructive or unhealthy way. Not in a way that kept me from functioning or maintaining relationships. But obsessed nonetheless.

As a child, I was fascinated by people. Why they did what they did. Why two people could experience the same event and walk away with entirely different interpretations. Why some people changed while others remained stuck. Why some relationships thrived while others deteriorated. Why certain words could wound and others could heal.

As I got older, that curiosity became deeply personal.

Like many people, I spent a period of my life battling demons of my own. What began as experimentation and an attempt to enhance experiences eventually became something far different. Over time, drugs stopped being something I used and became something that used me. They dictated my priorities, influenced my decisions, and slowly reshaped the rhythm of my daily life.

Looking back, I realize I became obsessed then, too.

Not just with the substances themselves, but with understanding how I had arrived at such a place. How could someone who considered himself intelligent make decisions that were clearly harming him? Why did I continue doing something I knew was costing me relationships, opportunities, and peace of mind? Why do some people find their way out while others remain trapped?

Recovery forced me to ask questions I had spent years asking about everyone else. Only now the subject was me.

I became obsessed with understanding addiction, behavior, motivation, change, and the mechanisms that keep people stuck. More importantly, I became obsessed with finding a way forward. Not simply abstaining, but rebuilding. Understanding. Growing.

In many ways, that chapter of my life deepened the curiosity that had always existed. It transformed psychology and human behavior from an academic interest into something intensely personal.

That curiosity eventually became a career. I spent years studying psychology, social work, counseling, and human behavior. Not because anyone forced me to. Not because it was required. Because I genuinely could not stop thinking about it.

Outside of my profession, the pattern continued.

Weight lifting became an obsession. Not simply building muscle, but understanding programming, recovery, nutrition, biomechanics, and the mental discipline required to pursue long-term goals.

Guitar became an obsession. The challenge of mastering a difficult skill. The realization that progress often comes in tiny, nearly invisible increments.

Gardening became an obsession. Learning that growth cannot be rushed. That some things require patience, consistency, and trust in a process that unfolds beneath the surface long before visible results appear.

Even stationery became an obsession. Pens, pencils, notebooks, paper. Tools that transform thoughts into something tangible. Objects that remind me there is still value in slowing down enough to think deliberately.

For much of my life, I viewed these obsessions as quirks. Personality traits. Interests that happened to capture my attention.

Now I wonder if they were something else entirely.

We often talk about obsession as though it is inherently dangerous. Parents worry about it. Teachers discourage it. Society tends to celebrate balance above all else.

Yet when I look around at people who have built meaningful lives, I rarely find casual participants.

I find people who care deeply.

People who read about their craft after everyone else has stopped working.

People who think about solutions while driving home.

People who wake up excited by problems that others find boring.

People who are consumed, at least for a season, by the pursuit of something they believe matters.

The more I reflect on my own life, the more convinced I become that the problem is not obsession.

The problem is having nothing worth obsessing over.

There is a profound difference between casually participating in life and becoming deeply invested in it.

One creates entertainment.

The other creates purpose.

Perhaps that is the real reason I became a therapist.

Not because I was fascinated by psychology textbooks.

Not because I enjoyed classrooms.

But because I became obsessed with a question that continues to follow me decades later:

Why do some people change while others remain stuck?

It is a question I first asked while trying to understand my own life. It is a question that shaped my recovery. It is a question that led me into social work and clinical practice. And it is a question I continue exploring with clients today.

If you find yourself wrestling with anxiety, depression, addiction, low self-esteem, difficult relationships, life transitions, or simply the feeling that you are capable of more than you’re currently experiencing, counseling can help.

My approach is practical, collaborative, and focused on helping people understand themselves differently so they can begin living differently.

In a sense, every counseling relationship begins with the same goal:

Helping someone break free from the patterns that keep them stuck.

If that’s something you’re looking for, I’d be honored to help.

Work with me!

Share a Perceptual Shift

Up to this point, I’ve largely discussed obsession from a safe distance. I’ve talked about weight lifting, guitar, gardening, psychology, writing, and the pursuit of mastery. All worthwhile pursuits. All examples of what can happen when someone commits themselves fully to something meaningful.

But there is another side to this conversation.

A side that is far less comfortable.

The truth is that my understanding of obsession was not shaped primarily by books, classrooms, or professional experience. It was forged in a period of my life when obsession stopped being productive and became destructive. A period when a single pursuit consumed nearly every thought, every decision, and every waking moment.

The remainder of this article is deeply personal.

It is a reflection on addiction, recovery, identity, and the uncomfortable realization that the very thing that nearly destroyed me ultimately became one of the tools that helped save my life.

Read more