GSoC 2026 Project 3 Draft Scope + MVP Design Review Request #188507
Unanswered
nusRying
asked this question in
Discussions
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Discussion Type
General
Discussion Content
Hello CircuitVerse mentors and contributors,
I’m preparing my GSoC 2026 proposal for Project 3: FSM to Circuit Synthesizer and would really appreciate early feedback on scope and technical direction.
Current draft materials
One-page design: [06-One-Page-Design.md]
Timeline and milestones: [02-Timeline-and-Milestones.md
Proposed MVP boundaries
Structured/tabular FSM input only (no advanced graphical editor initially)
Deterministic validation + binary state encoding
Boolean equation generation for next-state/output logic
Circuit mapping to editable CircuitVerse-compatible output
Recent contributions
[https://github.com/CircuitVerse/CircuitVerse/pull/7110]
[https://github.com/CircuitVerse/CircuitVerse/pull/7111
Questions for mentor alignment
Is this MVP scope realistic for a 175-hour project?
For lower implementation risk, should I sequence Moore-first and then Mealy, or build both in parallel?
Which existing simulator/data-flow interfaces should I integrate with first for best maintainability and reviewability?
I’m also building a small POC to validate conversion flow and will share it in this thread shortly.
Thank you for your guidance.
06-One-Page-Design.md
02-Timeline-and-Milestones.md
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions