Photo: Maria Montessori. Nationaal Archief (Dutch National Archives), collection 119-0489. Photographer unknown. Public domain. Via Wikimedia Commons.

In 1907, an Italian physician opened a small classroom in one of Rome’s poorest neighborhoods.

Her name was Maria Montessori.

And what she observed there would eventually change how educators around the world thought about learning.

Montessori noticed something remarkable: when children were given carefully designed activities, opportunities to explore, and the freedom to work independently, they often learned without constant instruction from an adult.

Rather than placing the teacher at the center of every activity, Montessori began designing environments that placed the learner at the center.

More than a century later, her ideas raise an interesting question for HR professionals:

What if the problem with workplace training isn’t what we’re teaching—but how we’re teaching it?

Share

Maria Montessori was one of Italy’s early female physicians, graduating from the University of Rome in 1896.

Her medical and educational work brought her into contact with children who had intellectual and developmental disabilities. She became interested in how people learn and began experimenting with educational materials, observation, and hands-on activities.

In 1907, she opened the first Casa dei Bambini, or Children’s House, in Rome’s San Lorenzo district.

Instead of relying exclusively on lectures, repetition, and teacher-directed instruction, Montessori created what became known as a prepared environment.

Children worked with specially designed materials, practiced skills through activities, and developed independence while teachers observed, guided, and adjusted the learning environment.

Montessori’s approach wasn’t simply about allowing children to do whatever they wanted. The activities, materials, and environment were intentionally designed to support learning.

Her methods attracted international attention, and Montessori schools eventually spread around the world.

Of course, Montessori developed her approach primarily for children, not adult employees. Her work should not be confused with modern adult learning theory.

But the broader questions her approach raises are remarkably relevant to workplace learning.

• How much do people learn by listening?

• How much do they learn by practicing?

• And how should we design an environment that helps people develop the skills they actually need?

Exam Connection

For HR certification candidates, Montessori’s story offers a useful lens for exploring Learning and Development.

Consider a familiar workplace scenario.

An organization introduces a new software system. Employees attend a two-hour presentation explaining its features, receive a reference guide, and complete a short knowledge quiz.

Everyone passes.

But three weeks later, employees are still struggling to use the system correctly.

Did the organization provide training—or did it simply provide information?

That distinction brings us directly into several important HR concepts:

• Instructional design: Selecting learning objectives, activities, and methods that support the desired performance outcomes.

• Experiential learning: Developing knowledge and skills through direct experience, practice, and reflection.

• On-the-job training: Helping employees learn while performing actual or closely supervised work tasks.

• Simulation and practice: Creating opportunities to apply skills in realistic, controlled environments.

• Learner engagement: Designing training that encourages participation, motivation, and active learning.

• Transfer of training: Ensuring employees can apply what they learned when they return to their jobs.

• Training evaluation: Determining whether learning has resulted in meaningful changes in behavior and performance.

Montessori’s story also reminds us that the learning environment matters.

Employees need more than information. Depending on the skill being developed, they may need opportunities to practice, receive feedback, make mistakes safely, and demonstrate competence.

And HR needs to select training methods based on the learning objective—not simply on what is easiest or least expensive to deliver.

A lecture might be appropriate for introducing a concept.

But if the goal is to perform a task, operate equipment, conduct an interview, or navigate a difficult employee conversation, employees may need something much more interactive.

Try This Week’s FREE AI Study Prompt

Choose a topic: instructional design, experiential learning, on-the-job training, simulation, learner engagement, transfer of training, or training evaluation.

Copy and paste the following prompt into your AI platform of choice:

More Resources

• American Montessori Society — About Dr. Maria Montessori

• Association Montessori Internationale — Biography of Maria Montessori

• Association Montessori Internationale — About Montessori

Thank You

HR laws, policies, and practices rarely develop in a vacuum. Behind them are real people, workplace problems, court cases, cultural shifts, and sometimes moments when someone simply decided that the way things had always been done needed to change.

HR in History is about connecting those stories to what you’re studying today. When you understand the story behind a law or HR practice, it becomes much easier to understand—and remember—why it matters.

Thank you for being here, for studying with me, and for continuing to build your HR knowledge one story at a time.

Sandy ✨

Sources:

• American Montessori Society. (n.d.). About Dr. Maria Montessori. https://amshq.org/about-us/history-of-ams/about-dr-maria-montessori/

• Association Montessori Internationale. (n.d.). Biography of Maria Montessori. https://montessori-ami.org/node/1820

• Association Montessori Internationale. (n.d.). About Montessori. https://montessori-ami.org/about-montessori

In this video, we explore Robert Mager’s approach to performance problems and the importance of determining whether an employee can’t do the job or won’t do the job before recommending training.

For the PHR, SPHR, SHRM-CP, or SHRM-SCP, remember: diagnose the root cause of the performance gap before choosing the appropriate HR intervention.

#HRCertification #LearningAndDevelopment #RobertMager #PHR #SPHR #SHRMCP #SHRMSCP

Learning doesn’t always begin in a classroom—and employees don’t always have to choose between earning a paycheck and developing new skills.

Registered Apprenticeship Programs combine paid employment, structured on-the-job learning, mentorship, supplemental instruction, and nationally recognized credentials to help organizations build the workforce they need.

But a Registered Apprenticeship is more than simply hiring an inexperienced employee and providing training. It is a structured workforce development pathway that connects learning, performance, compensation, and career progression.

Your challenge: Apply the U.S. Department of Labor’s guidance to 10 realistic workplace scenarios and identify the BEST HR response.

Primary source: U.S. Department of Labor — Registered Apprenticeship Program

1. Apprenticeship or On-the-Job Training?

A manufacturing company hires entry-level employees and pairs them with experienced workers who teach them how to operate equipment. The employees receive regular wages but have no formal training plan, supplemental instruction, or recognized credential.

Leadership wants to advertise the arrangement as a Registered Apprenticeship Program.

What should HR recommend?

A. Advertise the program as registered because it includes paid employment and experienced mentors.

B. Register the program based on its existing structure because formal classroom instruction is optional.

C. Develop the required program components and obtain registration through the appropriate apprenticeship agency before representing it as registered.

D. Replace the experienced workers with certified instructors before offering any work-based learning.

2. The Role of Mentorship

Read more

Dorothy Vaughan, mathematician and NASA pioneer. Photo: NASA (public domain).

Long before artificial intelligence began changing the workplace, there were people whose actual job title was computer.

They weren’t machines. They were mathematicians who performed complex calculations by hand, helping engineers solve problems involving aircraft, flight trajectories, and eventually space exploration.

One of those mathematicians was Dorothy Vaughan.

And when electronic computers began changing the work she and her colleagues performed, Vaughan did something that today’s HR professionals should find especially interesting.

She learned the technology that threatened to make her existing skills obsolete—and helped others learn it, too.

Subscribe now

Dorothy Vaughan joined the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), NASA’s predecessor, in 1943.

A former mathematics teacher, she became part of the West Area Computing unit at Langley Research Center, where Black women mathematicians performed demanding calculations supporting aeronautical research.

In 1949, Vaughan became the unit’s supervisor, making her NACA’s first Black supervisor.

But technology was changing.

As electronic computers became increasingly important to aerospace research, the work performed by human computers began to evolve.

Vaughan recognized the significance of that change. Rather than relying exclusively on her existing expertise, she learned FORTRAN, a programming language used for scientific and engineering calculations.

And she didn’t keep that knowledge to herself.

She helped her colleagues develop programming skills, preparing them for the transition from performing calculations by hand to working with electronic computers.

In 1958, when NACA became NASA, Vaughan and many of her colleagues joined the new Analysis and Computation Division. Vaughan went on to become an expert FORTRAN programmer and contributed to the Scout Launch Vehicle Program.

Her story is often told as part of the history of NASA’s Hidden Figures.

But it’s also a remarkable example of something HR professionals discuss constantly today:

Exam Connection

For HR certification candidates, Dorothy Vaughan’s story provides an excellent introduction to Learning and Development.

Imagine being an HR professional at NASA during the transition from human calculations to electronic computing.

You have experienced employees who understand the organization’s work, possess valuable institutional knowledge, and have demonstrated strong analytical abilities.

But the technology used to perform that work is changing.

Should the organization replace those employees with people who already know the new technology—or invest in developing the workforce it already has?

Before recommending either approach, HR needs to understand the gap between current capabilities and future requirements.

That brings us directly to several important HR concepts:

• Training needs assessment: Determining whether a performance or capability gap exists and whether training is the appropriate solution.

• Skills gap analysis: Comparing employees’ current knowledge, skills, and abilities with those required for future work.

• Upskilling: Helping employees deepen or expand skills within their current roles.

• Reskilling: Preparing employees to perform substantially different work as organizational needs change.

• Career development: Supporting employees as they prepare for new responsibilities and opportunities.

• Training evaluation: Determining whether learning initiatives improve employee capabilities and organizational performance.

Technology may change how work gets done, but organizations still need to decide how they will develop the people doing that work.

That’s as relevant to artificial intelligence today as it was to electronic computing in the 1950s and 1960s.

Try This Week’s FREE AI Study Prompt

Choose a topic: training needs assessment, skills gap analysis, upskilling, reskilling, career development, training methods, or training evaluation.

Copy and paste the following prompt into your AI platform of choice:

More Resources

• NASA — Dorothy Vaughan

• Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum — Hidden Figures

• Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum — Human Computer Project

Thank You

HR laws, policies, and practices rarely develop in a vacuum. Behind them are real people, workplace problems, court cases, cultural shifts, and sometimes moments when someone simply decided that the way things had always been done needed to change.

HR in History is about connecting those stories to what you’re studying today. When you understand the story behind a law or HR practice, it becomes much easier to understand—and remember—why it matters.

Thank you for being here, for studying with me, and for continuing to build your HR knowledge one story at a time.

Sandy ✨

Sources:

• Shetterly, M. L. (2016). Dorothy Vaughan. NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/people/dorothy-vaughan/

• Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. Hidden Figures. https://airandspace.si.edu/explore/stories/hidden-figures

• Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum. Human Computer Project.https://womenshistory.si.edu/human-computer-project

In this video, we compare the advantages and limitations of both recruiting approaches and explore how business strategy, workforce gaps, cost, speed, succession planning, and available talent should influence the decision.

If you’re preparing for the PHR, SPHR, SHRM-CP, or SHRM-SCP, remember: the exam isn’t just testing whether you know the difference between internal and external recruiting.

It’s testing whether you can determine which approach best supports the organization’s needs.

#HRCertification #TalentAcquisition #Recruiting #PHR #SPHR #SHRMCP #SHRMSCP #HumanResources

Share

Photo: Jack Black and his mother, Judith Love Cohen. Jason Merritt/Getty Images, via LA NACIÓN (2021).

Judith Love Cohen was an aerospace engineer who helped develop technology that would become critical to one of the most famous rescue missions in American history.

She was also the mother of actor and musician Jack Black.

And while her contribution to the Apollo 13 mission is remarkable, there’s another part of her story that HR professionals should know.

Cohen helped change how organizations think about job opportunities, qualifications, and who gets the chance to advance.

Subscribe now

Cohen earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Southern California while building her career and raising a family. Her engineering work included the Apollo Lunar Module’s Abort Guidance System, which played an important role in bringing the Apollo 13 astronauts home safely after an oxygen tank explosion in 1970.

According to her son, Neil Siegel, Cohen was so committed to her engineering work that she went to the office on the day Jack Black was born. She even took a computer printout of an unfinished problem to the hospital and later called her supervisor to report that she had solved it.

But Cohen’s influence wasn’t limited to engineering.

Throughout her career, she advocated for fairer workplace practices. In a remembrance published by USC, Siegel credited his mother with helping introduce practices that many organizations now take for granted:

• Posting job openings internally so employees could apply.

• Establishing formal job descriptions for positions.

• Creating more transparent access to workplace opportunities.

Exam Connection

For HR certification candidates, Judith Love Cohen’s story connects directly to workforce planning and talent acquisition.

How can employees compete fairly for opportunities if they don’t know those opportunities exist—or what qualifications are required?

That question brings us to several foundational HR practices:

• Job analysis: Identifying the essential duties, responsibilities, and qualifications associated with a position.

• Job descriptions: Documenting job responsibilities and requirements to support recruiting and selection.

• Internal recruiting: Making opportunities available to current employees who may possess the necessary qualifications.

• Selection criteria: Evaluating candidates against job-related requirements rather than subjective preferences.

• Internal mobility: Helping organizations recognize and develop talent already within their workforce.

There’s an important distinction here: posting a job internally doesn’t automatically make a selection process fair. HR must also ensure that qualifications are job-related, selection methods are consistent, and employment decisions comply with applicable laws.

But without clear job descriptions and accessible opportunities, employees may never have the chance to demonstrate what they can contribute.

Sometimes the best candidate isn’t someone the organization needs to recruit. It’s someone the organization already employs—but hasn’t considered.

Try This Week’s FREE AI Study Prompt

Choose a topic: job analysis, job descriptions, internal recruiting, selection criteria, internal mobility, or employee advancement.

Copy and paste the following prompt into your AI platform of choice:

More Resources

• USC Viterbi School of Engineering — In Memory of Judith Love Cohen

• The Lemelson Foundation — Judith Love Cohen

• O*NET OnLine — Explore occupational tasks, skills, knowledge, and work activities to support job analysis.

Thank You

HR laws, policies, and practices rarely develop in a vacuum. Behind them are real people, workplace problems, court cases, cultural shifts, and sometimes moments when someone simply decided that the way things had always been done needed to change.

HR in History is about connecting those stories to what you’re studying today. When you understand the story behind a law or HR practice, it becomes much easier to understand—and remember—why it matters.

Thank you for being here, for studying with me, and for continuing to build your HR knowledge one story at a time.

Sandy ✨

Sources:

• Siegel, N. (2016, July 29). In memory of Judith Love Cohen: Mother, wife, friend, author, engineer. USC Viterbi School of Engineering. First-person family account documenting Cohen’s engineering career, Apollo 13 contribution, and advocacy for internal job postings and formal job descriptions.

• The Lemelson Foundation. (2026, February 28). Judith Love Cohen. Biographical overview of her aerospace engineering career and contributions to the Apollo program.

• National Space Centre. Space Stories: Judith Love Cohen. Historical account of Cohen’s engineering education and work on the Apollo Lunar Module.

🎓 SHRM Foundation Certification Grants: The SHRM Foundation offers certification scholarships that can help eligible HR professionals cover the cost of pursuing their SHRM-CP or SHRM-SCP.

APPLICATION DEADLINE IS TODAY- October 16th.

Use Link https://shrm.submittable.com/submit

💰 HRCI October Special: HRCI is waiving its $100 exam application fee for a limited time! Use code FREEAPPOCT when applying for your exam. Use Link https://www.hrci.org

🎁 One more Friday special! New subscribers to the AI HR Certification Study Lab get the rest of October FREE! Come see what all the chatter is about and join us! Use Link https://sandrareedco.substack.com/welearntogether

Already a subscriber? THANK YOU! Please consider sharing Inside HR Certification with your network to help spread the word and bring more voices, ideas, and perspectives into our Study Lab.

Share

Whether you’re preparing for the PHR, SPHR, SHRM-CP, or SHRM-SCP, a little financial support can make your next career milestone more accessible.

Happy Friday, and happy studying! 🍂. Be sure and SHARE with your exam prep network to get the word out. #welearntogether

Sandy ✨

Inside Part 1 of this edition you will find:

• A summary of the case

• Certification practice questions around the central case themes, and

• An AI prompt for your own practice

Stay tuned for Part 2 where we explore the employer brand aspect of this case.

As headlines circulate about SHRM and its recent jury verdict, there is no shortage of opinions about what happened, what should have happened, and whether the organization could—or should—have done better. This article is not one of those.

The practice of HR offers lessons every single day. Sometimes those lessons come from our own workplaces. Sometimes they come from research, case law, or the experiences of other professionals. And sometimes, they come from the headlines themselves.

Ask Better questions.

A fundamental principle of effective HR practice is learning to ask better questions. In fact, one might argue that the situation involving SHRM could have benefited from a little more curiosity and a few more questions before reaching a decision.

Questions such as:

• What is the actual barrier? What specific workplace concern are we trying to address by not allowing a service dog in the workplace?

• What happens if we don’t accommodate the request? What are the potential legal, operational, and human consequences of denying the accommodation?

• What risks are we taking if we do accommodate the request? Are those risks substantiated, or are they based on assumptions? Can they be mitigated through thoughtful planning?

• What alternatives have we genuinely explored? Have we considered the individual’s needs, the essential functions of the role, and whether other options would be equally effective?

• What are we missing? Have we fully understood the request and the circumstances before deciding what is—and isn’t—possible?

These aren’t simply questions about one case or one accommodation request. They reflect a broader HR discipline: resisting the urge to jump to conclusions, challenging our own assumptions, and examining both the risks and the opportunities before making a decision.

Case Summary

The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), a leading professional organization in the HR field, has been found liable in a recent disability-discrimination case. The verdict offers an important opportunity for HR professionals to examine how employment law, hiring decisions, workplace accommodations, and organizational strategy intersect.

In Torres v. Society for Human Resource Management, job applicant Fiona Torres alleged that SHRM withdrew a job offer after she requested to bring her trained medical service dog to the workplace. Torres has Type 1 diabetes and explained that her dog helped alert her to potentially dangerous changes in her blood glucose levels.

SHRM maintained that it had offered alternative accommodations, including access to glucose-monitoring technology, food and drink at her workstation, and breaks to manage her condition.

After a four-day trial, a jury found SHRM liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Virginia Human Rights Act. The jury awarded Torres $400,000 in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The jury also found for SHRM on certain claims, including the allegation that it failed to engage in the interactive process. SHRM has stated that it disagrees with the verdict and is evaluating its appellate options.

Why does this matter to HR?

The case illustrates a fundamental distinction: offering an accommodation is not necessarily the same as providing an effective accommodation. Employers must evaluate requests in light of an individual’s circumstances, consider reasonable options, and assess whether a proposed solution actually addresses the person’s needs.

The lesson is not that every requested accommodation must automatically be granted. Rather, HR must approach accommodation requests thoughtfully, apply the law to the facts, and make decisions that can be explained and supported.

Read more: HR Dive’s coverage of the SHRM verdict | The plaintiff’s counsel’s case announcement

Part 1: CertificationPractice Questions

Workforce Planning and the Hiring Process

Use the case to test your ability to apply HR principles to realistic workplace decisions. Try these three questions:

1. An organization is developing a workforce plan for a new business unit. During recruitment, a qualified candidate requests a disability-related accommodation that would change how certain workplace tasks are performed. The hiring manager expresses concern that the accommodation may not align with the position’s current design. What should HR do FIRST?

   A. Determine whether the existing job design permits the requested accommodation before proceeding with the candidate.

   B. Evaluate the essential functions of the position and whether the candidate can perform them with or without reasonable accommodation.

   C. Request medical documentation to verify the disability before initiating the interactive process.

   D. Redesign the position to accommodate the candidate’s disability and ensure equal employment opportunity.

2. An HR director is evaluating a reasonable accommodation request from a candidate with a disability. HR engages in a timely, good-faith interactive process and proposes several alternative accommodations. However, the candidate explains that the proposed alternatives do not effectively address their disability-related needs. What should HR do NEXT?

   A. Document the good-faith interactive process and proceed with the employment decision because the employer has fulfilled its ADA obligations.

   B. Approve the candidate’s preferred accommodation because the ADA requires employers to honor an individual’s accommodation preference.

   C. Continue evaluating whether an effective reasonable accommodation can be provided without imposing an undue hardship.

   D. Withdraw the employment offer because the candidate has declined the alternative accommodations proposed by the employer.

3. An organization is facing an ADA discrimination claim after a hiring manager withdraws a conditional employment offer from a qualified candidate who requested a reasonable accommodation. The candidate alleges that the hiring manager personally made the discriminatory decision. Senior leadership asks HR whether the manager could be held individually liable. Which response is MOST accurate?

A. The hiring manager may be held personally liable under the ADA because the manager directly authorized the discriminatory employment decision.

B. Only the organization can face consequences because employment discrimination laws protect managers acting within the scope of their employment.

C. The hiring manager may be held personally liable if the organization cannot demonstrate that HR participated in the accommodation decision.

D. Individual managers generally are not personally liable under Title I of the ADA.

AI Prompt

For us at the AI HR Certification center, questions are central to leveraging the opportunity of AI as a learning partner.

These are the questions I asked AI to address for this edition of Inside HR Certification: Try them yourself and see what you can discover

Correct Answers and Explanations

1. Correct Answer: B

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), HR must evaluate whether a candidate can perform the essential functions of a position, with or without reasonable accommodation. This requires distinguishing essential functions from marginal duties and considering whether modifications to how work is performed would enable the candidate to meet job requirements. HR should engage in the interactive process to evaluate reasonable accommodations rather than assuming the existing job design cannot be modified. This approach aligns workforce planning and job analysis with the ADA’s requirements for nondiscriminatory employment decisions. The other options were incorrect because:

A. Rejecting an accommodation based solely on the existing job design may violate the ADA. In the disability discrimination case involving SHRM, a jury found SHRM liable after it rescinded a conditional employment offer to a candidate who requested permission to bring a diabetes-alert service dog to work. The case illustrates the importance of evaluating reasonable accommodations and fulfilling ADA obligations before withdrawing an employment offer.

C. Medical documentation may be requested when the disability or need for accommodation is not obvious, subject to ADA restrictions. However, documentation is not automatically required, and HR should not make medical verification a prerequisite to beginning the interactive process.

D. Although reasonable accommodations may involve modifying work methods, schedules, or marginal duties, the ADA does not require employers to eliminate essential job functions or fundamentally redesign a position. HR must first evaluate the position’s essential functions and determine which accommodations are reasonable and effective.

2. Correct Answer: C

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers must provide an effective reasonable accommodation to a qualified individual with a disability unless doing so would impose an undue hardship. Although employers are not necessarily required to provide the individual’s preferred accommodation, any alternative must effectively address the disability-related limitations. HR should continue evaluating reasonable options rather than assuming that participation in the interactive process alone satisfies the ADA. This distinction was illustrated in the Torres v. Society for Human Resource Management case, in which the jury found that SHRM engaged in a timely, good-faith interactive process (SHRM was not found liable on this aspect of the suit). The other options were incorrect because:

A. Documenting a timely, good-faith interactive process is important but does not independently establish compliance with the ADA. In Torres v. SHRM, the jury found that SHRM had satisfied its obligation to participate in the interactive process but was nevertheless liable for failing to provide reasonable accommodation. Employers must evaluate whether an effective accommodation can actually be provided.

B. The ADA does not automatically require employers to provide an individual’s preferred accommodation. Employers may select an alternative accommodation, provided it is effective in enabling the individual to perform essential job functions and otherwise meets ADA requirements.

D. Declining an ineffective alternative accommodation does not automatically justify withdrawing an employment offer. HR must evaluate whether another effective reasonable accommodation is available and whether providing it would impose an undue hardship before determining whether the candidate can perform the essential functions of the position.

3. Correct Answer: D

Under Title I of the ADA, liability for employment discrimination generally rests with the employer rather than individual supervisors or managers acting in their individual capacities. However, managers’ decisions can expose the organization to significant legal and financial consequences. Individual leaders may also face internal disciplinary action, termination, or potential personal liability under other applicable laws or legal theories.

Although individual liability was not an issue in the SHRM case, the case provides an opportunity to understand how liability is determined under employment law. HR professionals must distinguish between organizational liability for unlawful employment practices and individual accountability for the decisions that contribute to those violations. The other options are incorrect because:

A. A manager’s direct involvement in a discriminatory employment decision does not ordinarily establish personal liability under Title I of the ADA. The employer generally bears legal responsibility for discriminatory employment decisions made by managers acting on its behalf.

B. Although individual managers generally are not personally liable under Title I of the ADA, they are not protected from all consequences. Managers may face disciplinary action or termination for violating organizational policies, and other applicable laws may provide grounds for individual liability.

C. HR’s involvement does not determine whether a manager is personally liable under the ADA. The employer may be liable for discriminatory employment decisions regardless of whether HR participated in the decision. Managers remain accountable for complying with organizational policies and applicable legal requirements.

Thank you…

for subscribing to Inside HR Certification and/or the AI HR Certification Study Lab!

Our vision is to build a community of HR practitioners who leverage the opportunities AI provides to prepare for certification exams while strengthening the critical thinking, professional judgment, and real-world HR skills that technology cannot replace.

We believe AI should enhance human expertise, not substitute for it. Together, we’re exploring how to study smarter, think more strategically, and become more effective HR professionals—both on exam day and throughout our careers.

We’re glad you’re here, and we look forward to learning alongside you!

Sandy ✨

Job analysis sits at the intersection of strategy, people, and performance. It helps translate organizational strategy into the work that needs to be done—and influences everything from recruiting and selection to compensation, training, performance management, and succession planning.

If you’re preparing for the PHR, SPHR, SHRM-CP, or SHRM-SCP, don’t think of job analysis as simply creating a job description. Think of it as the bridge between what the business needs and what its people need to deliver.

#HRCertification #JobAnalysis #PHR #SPHR #SHRMCP #SHRMSCP #HumanResources

Every Tuesday, we go straight to the source—EEOC, DOL, OSHA, NLRB, and other authoritative HR resources—to turn real guidance into certification-style questions. Each quiz challenges you to move beyond memorizing rules and apply your knowledge to realistic workplace scenarios, strengthening the critical thinking and decision-making skills you’ll need on exam day.

The Americans with Disabilities Act does not require employers to ignore poor performance or unacceptable conduct. It does require HR professionals to recognize when disability, reasonable accommodation, the interactive process, confidentiality, medical inquiries, or consistent application of workplace standards may affect the response.

Primary source

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Applying Performance and Conduct Standards to Employees with Disabilities. The answer key also identifies relevant case law where it adds useful context.

1. Production Standards

A customer-service employee with a disability is expected to resolve 40 cases per week, the same standard applied to others in the role. The employee asks HR to lower the requirement to 30 because of the disability. What is the BEST HR response?

A. Temporarily lower the standard while HR determines whether the employee’s condition qualifies as a disability.

B. Maintain the standard and explain that production requirements can never be affected by an accommodation request.

C. Maintain the standard but explore a reasonable accommodation that could help the employee meet it.

D. Lower the standard if the employee provides medical documentation linking the disability to reduced productivity.

Read more

Image: J. Howard Miller, “We Can Do It!” (1943). Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Smithsonian National Museum of American History.

In 1942, American factories had a problem.

World War II had dramatically increased demand for airplanes, ships, ammunition, and military equipment. At the same time, millions of men were entering military service.

Factories needed workers. Lots of them.

And the traditional labor supply simply wasn’t going to be enough.

The solution? Recruit people who had historically been overlooked for many industrial jobs: women.

The result became one of the most recognizable workforce recruitment campaigns in American history.

Rosie the Riveter wasn’t a single person. She was a cultural symbol representing the millions of women who entered wartime industries, particularly manufacturing and defense production.

The character gained national attention through a popular 1943 song and Norman Rockwell’s Rosie the Riveter illustration. Behind the imagery was a very real workforce planning challenge.

Employers needed to fill positions quickly, train workers for unfamiliar jobs, and maintain production levels under extraordinary pressure. Women who had previously been excluded from many industrial occupations were recruited into jobs involving aircraft assembly, welding, machinery, and other skilled production work.

The campaign helped challenge assumptions about who could perform those jobs.

Women often faced unequal pay, discrimination, and resistance in the workplace. And when the war ended, many were expected or encouraged to leave industrial jobs as returning servicemen reentered the civilian workforce.

Rosie’s story wasn’t just about recruiting workers.

It was about what happens when an organization must reconsider its assumptions about the available talent pool.

Exam Connection

For HR certification candidates, Rosie the Riveter offers a memorable example of workforce planning and talent acquisition.

Consider the challenge facing wartime manufacturers:

What happens when an organization’s demand for talent exceeds the available supply of workers?

That question takes us directly into several important HR concepts:

• Workforce forecasting: Estimating how many workers and which skills will be needed to meet organizational objectives.

• Supply analysis: Evaluating whether the required talent is available internally or externally.

• Gap analysis: Identifying shortages between current workforce capabilities and future staffing needs.

• Recruitment strategies: Expanding recruiting sources and reaching qualified candidates who may not have been considered previously.

• Training and development: Preparing new workers to perform jobs requiring unfamiliar skills.

• Workforce flexibility: Adjusting staffing strategies when business conditions change.

In modern HR practice, this might involve reconsidering unnecessarily restrictive qualifications, expanding recruiting channels, creating apprenticeship programs, or developing internal talent.

The certification exam may present these challenges through a manufacturing expansion, a healthcare staffing shortage, a technology skills gap, or an organization entering a new market.

The underlying question remains the same: How should HR align workforce supply with organizational demand?

Try This Week’s FREE AI Study Prompt

Choose a topic: workforce forecasting, labor supply analysis, gap analysis, recruiting sources, alternative talent pools, skills-based hiring, or workforce development.

Copy and paste the following prompt into your AI platform of choice:

More Resources

• National Park Service — Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park

• National WWII Museum

• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — Labor market and workforce data

Thank You

HR laws, policies, and practices rarely develop in a vacuum. Behind them are real people, workplace problems, court cases, cultural shifts, and sometimes moments when someone simply decided that the way things had always been done needed to change.

HR in History is about connecting those stories to what you’re studying today. When you understand the story behind a law or HR practice, it becomes much easier to understand—and remember—why it matters.

Thank you for being here, for studying with me, and for continuing to build your HR knowledge one story at a time.

Sandy ✨

Sources:

• National Park Service. Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park. Historical background on women’s wartime employment and the home front.

• Library of Congress. Rosie the Riveter: Real Women Workers in World War II. Historical materials documenting women in wartime industries.

• National WWII Museum. Educational resources on women working on the American home front during World War II.

• Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of American History. Historical materials concerning the We Can Do It! poster and Rosie the Riveter imagery.

Use AI to Learn the Terms

First, download these labor relations terms. Then, attach the file to your AI platform of choice and copy and paste the following prompt:

Union Terms

34.7KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

Thank you for being here and for continuing to learn with us here in the Study Lab!

I hope these tools help you move beyond memorizing definitions and start seeing how these concepts show up in real HR situations, and, of course, on your exam.

Sandy ✨

In this video, we break down how HRCI and SHRM test your ability to connect HR decisions to organizational goals—from workforce planning and business metrics to risk, change, and talent strategy.

For the PHR, SPHR, SHRM-CP, or SHRM-SCP, remember the big question:

What is the organization trying to accomplish, and what should HR do to help it get there?

#HRCertification #HRStrategy #PHR #SPHR #SHRMCP #SHRMSCP

_{Allyson Felix testifies before the House Ways and Means Committee during a hearing on racial disparities and maternal mortality, May 16, 2019. Photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images.Allyson Felix was already one of the most accomplished track-and-field athletes in the world when she decided to have a baby.}

Allyson Felix was already one of the most accomplished track-and-field athletes in the world when she decided to have a baby… and she was also negotiating a new sponsorship contract with Nike.

Felix later said Nike offered her a new contract worth about 70% less than her previous agreement. She was willing to accept less money, but she asked for something else: a contractual guarantee that she would not be financially penalized if she couldn’t perform at her previous level in the months surrounding childbirth.

According to Felix, Nike wouldn’t give her that guarantee. So she spoke publicly about it.

Felix wasn’t alone. Professional runners Alysia Montaño and Kara Goucher had also raised concerns about how pregnancy affected athlete sponsorship agreements. Their stories created a much larger conversation about what happens when pregnancy and performance expectations collide.

In 2019, Nike expanded its maternity protections so that sponsored athletes would not face performance-related reductions for an 18-month period surrounding pregnancy—eight months before the due date and ten months afterward. Felix ultimately left Nike and signed with Athleta.

Exam Connection

For HR certification candidates, there’s an important distinction here: Felix’s dispute involved an athlete sponsorship agreement, so don’t automatically apply every employment law to her situation as though she were a traditional Nike employee. Instead, we can use her story to ask a broader HR question:

What happens when a policy that looks neutral creates a very different consequence for employees because of pregnancy (or any other protected status)?

In a traditional workplace, that question can lead us directly into pregnancy discrimination, accommodations, benefits, leave, compensation, consistent application of policy—and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.

Try This Week’s FREE AI Study Prompt

Choose a topic: pregnancy discrimination, PWFA, accommodations, compensation, benefits, leave, or employment policies. Here’s a list of fact sheets if you need some inspiration ;).

Copy and paste the following prompt into you AI platform of choice:

More Resources

Thank You

HR laws, policies, and practices rarely develop in a vacuum. Behind them are real people, workplace problems, court cases, cultural shifts, and sometimes moments when someone simply decided that the way things had always been done needed to change.

HR in History is about connecting those stories to what you’re studying today. When you understand the story behind a law or HR practice, it becomes much easier to understand—and remember—why it matters.

Thank you for being here, for studying with me, and for continuing to build your HR knowledge one story at a time.

Sandy ✨

Sources:

• Felix, A. (2019, May 22). My own Nike pregnancy story. The New York Times. Felix’s first-person account of her Nike contract negotiations and request for maternity protections. Her account is also summarized by The Washington Post.

• Kilgore, A. (2019, August 16). Under fire, Nike expands protections for pregnant athletes. The Washington Post. Documents Nike’s expansion of pregnancy protections to 18 months—eight months before the due date and ten months after.

• Maese, R. (2019, July 31). Allyson Felix became a mother, and now she wants to be an activist. The Washington Post. Covers Felix’s pregnancy, return to competition, Nike dispute, and decision to speak publicly.

• Gregory, S. (2021). Motherhood could have cost Olympian Allyson Felix. She wouldn’t let it. TIME. Provides Felix’s fuller account of the negotiations, pregnancy protections, departure from Nike, and move to Athleta.

• Maese, R. (2019, May 16). Olympian Allyson Felix tells Congress of racial disparities in maternal mortality. The Washington Post. Covers Felix’s congressional testimony about her pregnancy complications and racial disparities in maternal health

In this video, we explore Michael Porter’s approach to strategy and why organizational structure, people, and resources must align with the organization’s competitive direction. For HR professionals, strategy isn’t something that stays in the executive suite—it influences workforce planning, job design, talent decisions, and how work gets accomplished.

If you’re preparing for the PHR, SPHR, SHRM-CP, or SHRM-SCP, remember: when the business changes direction, HR should consider whether the organization’s people and structure are aligned to support that strategy.

#HRCertification #HRStrategy #MichaelPorter #PHR #SPHR #SHRMCP #SHRMSCP #HumanResources

It’s time! Our next 14-week HR Certification Study Series starts today, designed to help you prepare for your exam while still leaving room for real life—and the holidays.

Over the next 14 weeks, we’ll work through the major HR domain areas with:

• Daily AI study prompts, organized by HR domain

• Monday Motivation to start each week focused and moving

• Saturday Review Questions to test what you learned

• A structured study path that takes you through the holiday season

  ---

Check in daily, or work through the material as your schedule allows. The goal is steady progress—not perfect attendance. And you don’t have to hunt for anything: it’s all organized in the Navigation Document (pictured above), which will serve as your home base throughout the 14 weeks.

And remember, the Study Lab is more than the 14-week series. You’ll also have access to quizzes, practice exercises, exam-day resources, videos, and additional study tools to support you along the way. New content is added every week.

---

Paid subscribers: Don’t forget that your membership also includes a 30-minute Zoom call with me. Be sure to get yours scheduled so we can talk through your study plan, questions, or areas where you need a little extra support.

All of this is available for about $1 a day—or just $30 for an annual membership. At $30 for the entire year, that works out to about 8 cents a day.

Today is Day 1. Let’s get started!

✨ Sandy

In this Part 2 , we put those ideas into practice. These AI exercises are designed to help you clear the mental clutter, prioritize your exam prep, break intimidating study goals into manageable steps, and spend more of your limited study time on what actually moves you toward passing the exam.

🛠️ Interactive AI Prompt Exercises

Select your AI platform of choice, and practice with the following AI exercises.

Exercise 1: The HR Exam Study Matrix (Brain Dump Categorizer)

When preparing for an HR certification exam (like the PHR, SPHR, SHRM-CP, or SHRM-SCP), your mind gets flooded with competing priorities: dense legal regulations, practice tests, flashcards, work projects, and personal errands. Trying to keep all these tasks in your head creates severe cognitive overload.

This prompt acts as an automated Eisenhower Matrix, instantly sorting your chaotic study list and daily to-dos into an organized, high-yield study plan.

The Task:

1. Open a blank document or AI chat window.

2. Type out 5–10 random study topics, exam anxieties, work tasks, or errands floating in your head.

3. Paste the prompt below right above or below your messy list.

Plaintext

PROMPT TEMPLATE:

Act as an expert HR exam coach and executive productivity assistant. I am currently studying for my [INSERT EXAM NAME, e.g., PHR / SHRM-CP / SPHR / SHRM-SCP] exam while managing my daily workload. 

I am going to give you a messy "brain dump" list of study topics, practice items, work tasks, and anxieties floating in my head.

Organize this list into a clean table with four columns:
1. High-Yield Study Wins (Quick <15 min review: flashcards, term definitions, quick formulas)
2. Strategic Deep Study (Needs a 60-90 min focus block: scenario questions, complex laws, or weak exam domains)
3. Operational / Work Tasks (Workplace duties to batch or handle efficiently)
4. Low-Priority / Distractions (Tasks to postpone until after this study block)

For each item, add a 1-sentence recommended next action step mapped to HR exam success.

Here is my brain dump:
[PASTE YOUR MESSY UNORGANIZED LIST HERE]

💡 Why This Neuroscience Technique Works

• Offloads Working Memory (Reduces Cognitive Load): Your brain’s working memory can only hold about 4 to 7 items at once. Storing an unorganized list of study topics alongside daily work tasks consumes critical bandwidth, causing brain fog and background anxiety. Externalizing the list onto a page immediately frees up processing power for deep learning.

• Silences the Zeigarnik Effect: Unfinished tasks stay active in your subconscious mind, constantly interrupting your focus with thoughts like “Don’t forget to study FMLA retention rules!” Once you record these items into a structured system, your prefrontal cortex recognizes that the information is safe, allowing your brain to enter a state of deep focus.

• Streamlines Decision-Making (Prevents Decision Fatigue): Choosing what to study next consumes significant mental energy. By automating the categorization into “Quick Wins” vs. “Deep Study,” you eliminate the mental effort of decision-making and jump straight into effective active recall.

Exercise 2: The “Exam Study Slicing” Prompt

When a massive exam domain or difficult topic feels intimidating (e.g., “Mastering Financial Ratios for the SPHR” or “Understanding GDPR Compliance Rules”), use this prompt to reduce study anxiety and break dense study materials into micro-sessions.

The Task:

Pick one specific exam objective or dense study topic you have been avoiding.

Example Topic: “Reviewing 50 pages of Employment Law for my PHR exam” or “Building situational judgment strategies for the SHRM-CP exam”.

PROMPT TEMPLATE:

I am preparing for my [INSERT EXAM NAME, e.g., PHR / SHRM-CP / SPHR] certification exam, and I am procrastinating on studying this specific topic because it feels overwhelming:
"[INSERT YOUR DENSE OR INTIMIDATING STUDY TOPIC HERE]"

Act as an expert exam coach and behavioral psychologist. Help me lower the "activation energy" required to start studying this topic by doing the following:

1. Break this study topic down into 3 ultra-small, progressive micro-learning steps.
2. Make Step 1 so simple and frictionless that it takes less than 2 minutes to complete (e.g., "Read just 3 key term definitions on flashcards" or "Skim only the chapter headings").
3. Create 1 practice test question based on Step 1 to immediately test my recall.
4. Give me a 1-sentence mindset prompt to get me started right now without overthinking.Exercise 3: The 10-Minute Workday Shutdown Routine Generator

💡 Why This Neuroscience Technique Works

• By-passes the Amygdala (Threat Response): When you face a massive 50-page chapter, your brain perceives the sheer volume as a threat. This activates the amygdala, triggering a fight-or-flight response that leads directly to procrastination. Shrinking the task down to a 2-minute step bypasses that alarm system so you can start without stress.

• Triggers Early Dopamine Release: Completing Step 1—even something as simple as reading three flashcards—signals a quick win to your brain. This releases a small hit of dopamine, the chemical responsible for motivation, which lowers the mental effort needed to keep going.

• Capitalizes on Momentum (The Zeigarnik Effect): Once you actually cross the starting line and answer a quick recall question, your brain registers an active learning task in progress. Your mind naturally wants to close open loops, making it much easier to transition into a full study session.

Exercise 3: The “Neuroscience Scaffolder” Prompt

When studying complex certification concepts (like HRIS data flows, labor laws, or strategic planning models), attempting to learn the whole topic at once overloads your working memory.

This prompt instructs the AI to scaffold a tough topic into three distinct cognitive layers—building from basic mental models up to high-level situational judgment.

The Task:

Pick one complex exam topic or domain that feels hard to grasp or apply.

Examples:

• “Role-Based Access Control & System Integrations (PHR)”

• “Ethical AI Governance & Algorithmic Bias in Talent Acquisition (SHRM-SCP)”

• “Organizational Change Management Frameworks (SHRM-CP)”

PROMPT TEMPLATE:

I am studying for my [INSERT EXAM NAME, e.g., PHR / SHRM-CP / SPHR / SHRM-SCP] exam. 

I need help understanding this specific topic using educational scaffolding:
"[INSERT YOUR COMPLEX STUDY TOPIC HERE]"

Act as an expert exam tutor and cognitive learning specialist. Scaffold this topic for me across 3 progressive learning levels:

1. Level 1 (The Conceptual Anchor): Explain this concept using a simple, real-world everyday analogy (like an airport, restaurant, or traffic system) to lower my cognitive load.
2. Level 2 (The Core Mechanics): Translate that analogy directly into official exam terminology and bullet out the 3 to 4 core facts/rules I must memorize.
3. Level 3 (The Exam Scenario): Create 1 realistic, scenario-based multiple-choice question testing how this topic appears on the actual exam. 

After the question, wait for my response before giving me the correct answer and explaining why the distractors are incorrect.

💡 Why This Neuroscience Technique Works

• Reduces Cognitive Overload: The human working memory can only process a small amount of new, abstract data at once. Starting with a simple visual or analogy (Level 1) anchors the new concept to information your brain already understands.

• Encourages Active Recall: Moving from the analogy (Level 1) directly to formal terminology (Level 2) and practical testing (Level 3) forces your brain to build strong neural pathways, converting short-term memory into long-term recall.

Join the Chat!

We’re diving into these AI prompt exercises for study and productivity, and this chat is open for us to collaborate and test them out together!

Share your results! Tell us what worked, what surprised you, or how you tweaked the prompt to fit your study style.

Jump in whenever you’re ready—let’s share our insights, troubleshoot tricky topics, and build some great study momentum together!

In gratitude,

Sandy ✨

One of the things I hear most often is, “I just don’t know how to fit it all in.”

Unfortunately, I don’t have that magic wand either. But this resource will hopefully help you fit exam prep into an already-full life.

You Can’t Manage Time-but You Can Decide What Gets It

We call it “time management,” but none of us can actually manage time. We all get the same 24 hours, and there is no productivity hack that creates a 25th.

In his book, Four Thousand Weeks, Oliver Burkeman offers a useful perspective: if we live to around 80, we get roughly 4,000 weeks. And here’s the kicker: about 1,000 of those 4,000 weeks happen before we even turn 20.

The book reminded me of something rather simple:

None of us is getting out alive.

I don’t mean to be flip, but rather to remind us that, for the average human, we often set ourselves up to fail our own expectations.

We’re supposed to cultivate spirituality, travel the world, become a millionaire, grow our own food, raise a healthy family, exercise every day, continue our education, save the whales, build a successful career…and somehow still have plenty of “downtime” to relax.

The Math Ain’t Mathing

We try to fit everything into 365 days a year when, as Burkeman reminds us, doing everything simply cannot be done. The point isn’t to squeeze more into the weeks we have left. It’s to become more intentional about what deserves to fill them, and just as importantly, what doesn’t.

Setting intentions translates to the workplace as well. Michael Porter, Management Guru and Harvard Professor famously said:

The Exam Prep Connection

Choice management is critical when preparing for a difficult exam. Success depends as much on deciding what not to spend your time on as it does on choosing what deserves your finite focus.

Remember: Exam prep is finite. Focused, intentional practice will help you reach this goal sooner so you can move your time and attention to your next priority. As Patrick Lencioni reminds us,

With that in mind, here are 10 practical, research-informed strategies to help clear the mental noise, protect your attention, and focus on what matters- followed by a companion article showcasing a few AI prompts to help you get, and maybe even stay, focused while you navigate exam prep.

1. Clear Your Mental Debris

Unfinished tasks have a funny way of following us around. Even when we’re not actively working on something, our brains may continue returning to it.

The good news? You don’t necessarily have to finish everything to quiet some of that mental noise. Research has found that making a specific plan for an unfinished goal can reduce intrusive thoughts about it and free cognitive resources for something else.

The Fix: Start or end every workday with a five-minute brain dump. Write down every task, idea, obligation, and lingering thought. Then decide what needs action, what can wait, and what perhaps doesn’t need to be done at all. lately, I have been doing a brain dump into AI at the end of the day, and asking it to help me identify my top 3 priorities for tomorrow.

The Science: Research by Masicampo and Baumeister found that unfinished goals can remain cognitively active, but making specific plans for completing them can reduce their interference with other tasks.

2. Protect Your Best Focus Time

Your ability to concentrate isn’t unlimited, nor does everyone do their best thinking at the same time of day (after 3:00 PM, I am toast.)

Instead of trying to maintain peak concentration for eight straight hours, identify the periods when you tend to think most clearly and protect some of that time for work requiring real concentration.

The Fix: Block 30, 60, or 90 minutes for focused work. Turn off notifications, close unnecessary tabs, and give one important task your full attention. When your concentration begins to fade, take a genuine break. On days where I am frazzled, I return to AI and say “I have a power hour, based on my priorities, where should I spend it?”

The Science: Research on sustained attention shows that performance can decline during prolonged tasks and that brief interruptions can help counteract that decline.

3. Stop Paying the Task-Switching Tax

Answer an email. Return to the report. Check Teams. Go back to the report. Respond to a text. Now…where were you? My AI calls these my “side-quests”.

What we commonly call multitasking is often rapid task-switching, and those transitions aren’t cognitively free.

The Fix: Group similar work together. Process email, return calls, review updates, and complete routine administrative tasks during designated periods instead of responding every time something demands your attention. I also build in selective side-quests for when I need a mental break from some of the more thought-heavy work, so at least I know how far down the side-path I want to allow myself can go. Sort of a quest snack, if you will.

The Science: Researcher Sophie Leroy calls one consequence attention residue. After switching tasks, some of our attention can remain focused on the previous task, interfering with performance on the next one.

4. Take Real Breaks

More time sitting at your desk does not necessarily equal more productive work.

Attention becomes fatigued. And scrolling through your phone while simultaneously thinking about work may technically be a break from your spreadsheet—but it isn’t necessarily much of a break for your brain.

The Fix: Step away periodically. Walk. Stretch. Close your eyes. Get outside. Sit quietly for a few minutes. Give your attention an opportunity to disengage. The key is to not try and resolve digital fatigue with a digital tool. As my daughter in law says, “touch grass, mom”.

The Science: Experimental research on sustained attention has found that brief, occasional breaks can help prevent the decline in performance that occurs when attention is continuously directed toward the same task.

5. Do What Matters Before What Shouts

The loudest task isn’t necessarily the most important one.

Email, notifications, requests, and other people’s priorities can easily consume an entire day before you’ve touched the work that actually matters.

The Fix: Identify the most important use of your attention today and protect time for it before reactive work takes over. Whenever possible, match demanding work to the time of day when you tend to think best.

Before automatically saying yes to the next request, return to these three questions:

Is this worth my peace?

Is this worth my attention?

Will this move me closer to what matters most?

If the answer is no, it can wait.

6. Make Your Work Visible-and Limit What Is “In Progress”

Working memory has limited capacity. Trying to mentally carry every deadline, follow-up, appointment, idea, and project creates unnecessary cognitive load.

So stop asking your brain to be your project-management system.

The Fix: Put your work somewhere you can see it—a calendar, task manager, notebook, or a simple board divided into To Do, In Progress, and Done. I love, love, love the extra large post it notes- like the size-of-my-head kind. It’s fun to create and I can stick it on my office door as an impossible-to-miss reminder of what I said I wanted to get done.

Speaking of notes…If you have 17 things “in progress,” you probably don’t have 17 priorities. You have 17 things competing for your attention.

The Science: Research on working-memory capacity suggests that we can actively maintain only a limited amount of information at once. Externalizing tasks reduces the need to continually keep all of those intentions mentally active.

7. Decide How Much Time Something Deserves

Not everything deserves your maximum effort.

Without boundaries, it’s remarkably easy to spend another hour researching, tweaking, formatting, rewriting, or perfecting something that was perfectly adequate an hour ago. This is the one I am probably the most guilty of. There are just so many ways to do something, and I want to explore them all!

The Fix: Give the task a time budget before you begin. Maybe it’s 30 minutes for a routine memo, 45 minutes for a first draft, or an hour for a presentation.

When the time is up, ask:

Will spending more time on this meaningfully improve the outcome?

If the answer is no, you’re done. If yes, carry on.

8. Make the Next Step Smaller

Procrastination isn’t necessarily laziness.

Research suggests procrastination can function as a form of short-term mood regulation. If a task feels overwhelming, boring, uncertain, frustrating, or intimidating, avoiding it makes us feel better—at least temporarily.

The Fix: Make the next step ridiculously small.

Don’t write Finish presentation.

Write Open PowerPoint and create the title slide.

Don’t write Work on taxes.

Write Find last month’s bank statement.

You don’t need enough motivation to finish. You need a first step small enough to start.

The Science: Research by Fuschia Sirois and Timothy Pychyl connects procrastination with short-term mood repair: we avoid an unpleasant task to feel better now, while leaving the consequences for our future selves.

9. Decide What You Are NOT Going to Do

This may be the most overlooked time-management strategy of all.

Every yes consumes time that can no longer be spent somewhere else.

Prioritization therefore isn’t simply deciding what you’re going to do. It also means accepting what you are going to postpone, delegate, decline-or never do at all.

The Fix: Keep a Not Now list alongside your to-do list.

When another task, opportunity, meeting, or request appears, don’t automatically say yes, but rather, ask yourself

If I say yes to this, what am I saying no to?

10. Create a Shutdown Ritual-and Then Stop

There will always be another email. Another project. Another load of laundry.

Another thing you could improve, organize, finish, or do “real quick.” The list is not going to magically disappear. The more you get done, the more opportunity there is to fill it right back up.

The Fix: Spend 10 minutes at the end of your day capturing unfinished tasks, checking tomorrow’s calendar, and identifying what deserves your attention next. Then close the laptop. Yes, the work will still be unfinished. But it won’t disappear.

Ernest Hemingway used a similar strategy in his writing. Rather than working until he had completely exhausted an idea, he intentionally stopped while he still knew what would happen next. That gave him a clear place to begin when he returned to his work the following morning.

Ready to put these ideas into practice?

Head over to the companion article, Interactive AI Prompt Exercises, where I’ve created practical prompts to help you clear the mental clutter, prioritize your study time, break overwhelming topics into manageable steps, and get started. Let us know what you think.

Did You Find This Article Helpful?

Please share our publication with your HR network! The more voices we bring together, the stronger- and more valuable- our community becomes.

In gratitude,
Sandy ✨

In April 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Muldrow v. City of St. Louis and rejected a standard that required an employee challenging a discriminatory job transfer to show a “significant” employment disadvantage.

Instead, the Court said the employee must show some harm with respect to the terms or conditions of employment—the harm does not have to be significant.

🎥 In this short video, I break down Muldrow and why the decision matters for HR.

Remember that you will be tested on employment and labor laws—and the court decisions interpreting them—as they apply at the time you sit for your exam, which means even good study materials can become outdated. That’s why we use the Top 20 Employment & Labor Law Fact Sheets here in the Study Lab—to give you direct access to current information and primary sources as you prepare.

Read the Supreme Court’s Muldrow v. City of St. Louis opinion

#HRCertification #EmploymentLaw #TitleVII #PHR #SPHR #SHRMCP #SHRMSCP #HumanResources #sandramreed

Let’s Chat!

What study method is helping you learn employment and labor law? Are you using practice questions, flashcards, videos, real-world cases, AI prompts or something else? Share what’s working for you!

Study Hack: Instead of memorizing each law in isolation, ask: “What workplace problem was this law designed to prevent or correct?” Then connect it to a real workplace example. Understanding the why makes the what easier to remember.

The Big Question

What happens when HR makes the right analysis using the wrong data?

HR technology can produce beautiful dashboards, detailed reports, and sophisticated analytics. But none of those tools can compensate for inaccurate, incomplete, inconsistent, or outdated information.

Before asking, “What does the data tell us?” HR sometimes needs to ask an even more basic question:

“Can we trust the data?”

Why It Matters

Read more