About a month ago the Zionist censorship machine led by depraved scumbag Liora Rez and her “StopAntiSemitism” account that trawls random people’s social media, found an Instagram account of a neurologist who had shared one of my posts. This led to a Zionist mass doxing and smear campaign to have her fired, and soon she was forced to resign. A deluge of death threats by Zionists went along with this of course.

I felt terrible about this as I was seeing it unfold, but I decided to not draw more attention to it by posting about it, and the neurologist deactivated her account so I had no way to get in touch with her.

Recently I got an email from a local reporter doing a story on this, asking me for comment, and I sent her the response added in the image, with the request to forward my message to her. This was done, and soon after Michelle Bravo sent me a very kind email back. Here is the email I sent in response to the reporter:

Now as I said, there is a crucial point here that must not be obfuscated by Zionist hysteria by scum like Liora Rez/StopAntisemitism who gleefully weaponized Charlie Kirk’s murder for their ends: He himself believed that freedom of speech was an essential good no matter how offensive that speech was. Now I fully stand by what I said about Kirk’s politics on the genocide, which were depraved and sick and per himself were designed to launder the genocide among conservatives. This is not even controversial, it was his official position that he repeated ad nauseum, as others to his right had also made note of, and they constantly (and correctly) criticized him for his Zionist shilling in public.

All the stuff that came out later with his possible change of view and how Zionists went insane over that was unknown then, and I have written about how the Mossad would assassinate him for that reason.

But again, the essential point is that he himself said that people should not be cancelled, fired, blacklisted, censored for expressing their views, no matter how offensive. What makes this case all the more disgusting and depraved is that Zionist scum like Liora Rez intentionally sought this out, going so far to find random insta accounts of random citizens with like a dozen followers sharing other people’s posts, not even their own, to do the whole “OMG LOOK THE PRO PALLIES HATED KIRK OMG LOOK AT THE PRO PALLIES YOU HAVE TO BE ZIONIST LIKE ME NOW, YOU HAVE TO SUPPORT MY TOP TEN ANTISEMITES LIST NOW, YOU HAVE TO AGREE MS RACHEL IS AN ANTISEMITE NOW.”

If you are naive and stupid enough to fall for that, you deserve to be ruled by these Zionist scum, because you’re clearly too much of an idiot to see how their propaganda operates.

For everyone else who knows just how disgusting and vile Liora Rez is, and btw as I said in my email response she is funded by Zionist billionaire scum like Adam Milstein, you know that this vast Zionist censorship industrial complex, which goes against everyone no matter what your ideological background or politics, must always in all circumstances be opposed. Just like they are indiscriminate in who they target, we must be indiscriminate in upholding the principle that these scum cannot be allowed to censor, blacklist and fire people on behalf of their precious genocidal Israeli death and rape-cult, the sole thing they are loyal to.

This is the only way these Zionist Gestapo tactics can be stopped: solidarity with those who are targeted by it. If those are targeted are not subject to isolation, ostracizing, and, crucially, financial and material damages to their lives, then the weapon is made impotent. Then it no longer carries any weight at all. In fact, being targeted by it can be used as a badge of honor: Look, the Zionist Gestapo is coming after me, this proves that I am actually principled and have minimum morality, ethics and decency as a person. Just like Ms Rachel and all the others who are the targets of this deranged Liora Rez scumbag.

To that end, I ask you all to donate to Michelle Bravo. I told her that she incurred a lot of costs due to this Zionist censorship campaign, and she should pursue any means she can to fight it. She made a Gofundme for this purpose, and I encourage you all to donate however much you can to it. Here is the link again: https://gofundme.com/f/stand-with-dr-bravo-against-unjust-accusations

And here is the article that was published which includes some of my quotes, as well as more background on Bravo and her excellent work as a neurologist saving people’s lives. And here you can read the statement from the local union standing with Bravo against these vile Zionist Gestapo tactics. At the end of that email to the reporter I added a list of sources exposing the genocidal Zionist censorship operation run by Liora Rez via the “Stop Antisemitism” account and its deranged “top ten anti-Semites” rankings. Here is that list:

x.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1721601948292424000

https://forward.com/fast-forward/421114/aipac-pro-israel-muslim-ilhan-omar-rashida-tlaib-dual-loyalty/

https://forward.com/fast-forward/421149/adam-milstein-aipac-twitter-omar-tlaib-muslim/

https://washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/04/16/stop-antisemitism-twitter-zionism-israel/

https://slate.com/technology/2025/05/israel-gaza-war-news-palestine-pallywood.html

https://defector.com/whos-afraid-of-a-palestinian-flag-pin

https://defector.com/ms-rachel-is-hamas-now

https://theintercept.com/2018/11/22/israel-boycott-canary-mission-blacklist/

https://theintercept.com/2019/03/25/adam-milstein-israel-bds/

https://theintercept.com/2025/04/02/penn-israel-canary-mission-peisach/

https://thenation.com/article/world/canary-mission-israel-covert-operations/

https://eu.tallahassee.com/story/news/local/state/2025/11/10/court-hears-case-on-charlie-kirk-post-that-got-state-worker-fired/87151940007/

Debunking the Ruth Halperin-Kaddari “Dinah Project” rape hoax relaunch “report”

Before I begin, this is essential: Haaretz itself citing the forensic pathologists at the Shura Base where all the bodies from October 7 were brought for detailed forensic analysis and autopsies stated that none of them, zero, had any signs of rape, sexual violence or genital mutilation. None of them. Zero.

So all these genocidal hoax-actors are proven liars. They are all established proven genocide-actors performing a script to ensure the actual mass systematic pedophilic gang-rape of Palestinian children, girls, boys, women and men continues until they have all been raped to death.

Update, 9-7-2025: The UN has just come out and confirmed that the new Israeli rape hoax report's claim about Hamas systematic weaponized use of sexual violence is false, and was proven to be without any credible evidence by all the independent expert UN and human rights investigations:

This is what they are desperately trying to hide: Literally every single actual investigation by legally mandated experts have debunked the "mass systematic rape" hoax, and conclude Israel is actually guilty of it as you can see here, here, here and here. Every Zionist accusation is a confession.

The BBC has just come out with its rape hoax re-launch story, by David Gritten. He just copy-pasted the Israeli regime's Kaddari promo, and repeated the lie about the Patten report confirming the rape hoax when it was not mandated and the UN debunked it.

They link to the report which has now been published. Guess what? It cites Shari Mendes and ZAKA's Chaim Otmazgin as part of their cast of genocide-hoaxers, both of whom have been exposed as liars ages ago. Mendes said she saw non-existent fetuses cut from wombs. Otmazgin was forced to admit he lied about a rape he claimed he saw by the AP. Again, all of this was made public long ago and anyone who knows anything about the rape hoax is aware of this, as you can see here and here.

This by itself renders the entire "report" totally useless genocidal propaganda trash.

I told you they would do this. And I told you the BBC and the rest of the media class would pretend that it's actually a credible new report with OMG FACTUAL OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE PROVING THE RAPE HOAX.

On page 38 they cite as evidence Otmazgin's claim that he has photos of a metal object inserted into a vagina. But the UN's Patten report, NBC News and Haaretz saw those photos and said he lied about it. I debunked the entire report in less than 10 seconds after I first opened it by just looking for this.

David Gritten of the BBC laundered the entire "report" as fact, and then cited Pramila Patten's UN report which is not legally mandated and did not establish anything beyond a very low evidentiary threshold as additional backing for it, lying that it confirms it. But even she debunked this lie after having reviewed the photos. Here is Patten herself directly debunking a core claim that is in the report about objects inserted into vaginas having viewed the same photos that this report now claims are actual proof of it:

They actually cite Simcha Greinman and the New York Times "Screams Without Words" hoax in the "report" as core pieces of evidence. HAHAHAHA. This is actually more fucking brazenly shameless than I expected. SIMCHA GREINMAN THE ZAKA HOAXER whose every deranged claim has been debunked by the UN and other reports as you can also see here. The same Simcha Greinman said in a piece published on 9 November 2023 that he had not taken a single photo of anything he fabricated he saw with his own eyes and touched with his own hands:

Then he appeared in Sheryl Sandberg’s genocidal hoax YouTube video and suddenly he had a whole gallery full of photos on his phone that he began to show her as she feigned horror and shock! Wow, Simcha! How did you get those photos?! You were on the record saying you had none, and then magically you suddenly found photos on your phone! Watch the entire grotesque charade of him and fellow ZAKA hoaxer Chaim Otmazgin showing the photos here, and here are his contradictory genocidal hoax-stories that were proven to be false by the UN reports:

And still Simcha Greinman made it alongside Chaim Otmazgin as primary key direct eyewitnesses WITH VERY REAL PHOTO EVIDENCE in the new “Dinah report”:

More on the depraved Greinman and Otmazgin ZAKA hoax pedophile mass rape defenders and grifters (yes, they actually defended the ZAKA founder who is a serial pedophile mass rapist) in this thread and infographic.

This is the "report" that the BBC now prominently features on its front page, via that cunt piece of shit scumfuck David Gritten, and launders as being an actually credible new serious "report" with NEW EVIDENCE BREAKING OMG NEW RAPE HOAX IS NOW CONFIRMED OMG PATTEN ALSO CONFIRMED IT OMG NEW BREAKING.

Agam Goldstein-Almog is also cited in the report as key eyewitness testimony evidence. There's just one problem: In her first interview after her release she said Hamas treats women as queens, then was called a whore traitor by Israelis, then changed her story and fabricated hoaxes:

They actually cite Mia Schem in the report as evidence, who said "Hamas raped me with their eyes", then went back to Tel Aviv and was actually raped and then the Israeli police and media called her a deranged liar and covered for her rapist.

So we have to believe all Israeli genocidal Zionist women when they fabricate deranged genocidal hoaxes about being "raped by the eyes of Palestinians", but when they are actually really raped by Zionist Jews they are depraved crazed liars who have to be smeared and discounted as hysterics.

The shameless depravity of these scum really knows no bounds.

And remember, the BBC now has this report on its front page as a credible new report with new evidence that proves the rape hoax. And soon the NYT will follow, and the Guardian, and the Washington Post, AP, Reuters.

It began with Christina Lamb in the Sunday Times, then the BBC, then the rest, exactly like the first round of the rape hoax.

The same playbook again, exactly as I said.

They have a very serious problem now. The person identified as D. who said he was gang-raped at the Nova Festival and sued the Israeli state for 137 million dollars is not in this report that cites every other hoaxer. I thought you believed all Israelis?

Wait, so an Israeli "October 7 survivor" came out in the media and said he was gang-raped, it was reported on by Haaretz as well, and it was prominently spread as the first rape survivor to have come out, and you didn't include him in your "report" that includes Shari Mendes, the ZAKA hoaxers, Sapir, Raz Cohen, the entire genocide-actor cast?

So you have now admitted that Israelis who are "survivors" of October 7 lie about not just seeing or hearing "gang-rapes", but actually being gang-raped themselves. Because you don't believe him.

You refuse to believe the firsthand testimony of this person who said he was violently gang-raped by Hamas on October 7 at the Nova Festival, so you are saying that Israelis lie and make up and fabricate stories of rape, not just hearing and seeing it, but actually personally experiencing it, being victims of it.

Now of course no one else will make note of this obvious glaring contradiction between the slogan of "Believe All Israeli Women and Men Who Say They Saw, Heard or Experienced Rape" and the dismissing of the actual rape by a Zionist Jew of Mia Schem, and the rape-hoax of this "D." person who is suing the Israeli state for 137 million dollars and so can't be laundered in reports like these that are funded and run by the Israeli regime because they don't want to give out that cash.

The entire edifice of the rape hoax in this "report" and in general is totally destroyed by this one fact alone, let alone the countless others.

The AP has now posted its copy-paste promo for the rape-hoax relaunch, this one is by Tia Goldenberg who has authored previous rape hoax pieces. Now here is something that shows you just how depraved these scum are: Tia Goldenberg co-authored the AP piece that proved Chaim Otmazgin lied about his rape hoax claim, the very claim that is now repeated in this new "report" as crucial evidence.

So Tia Goldenberg did not even bother to read the report. She just copy-pasted the promo for it that was sent around by Kaddari to all the Zionist proxies in the Western media class, without even realizing that her own piece that she co-authored debunks a core part of it and proves that it is just pure genocidal hoax propaganda filled with proven falsehoods THAT SHE HERSELF HAS ESTABLISHED.

I mean it really is just astonishing just how sick and depraved these Zionist propagandist scum in the media class are. It's just amazing

How to launder a rape hoax via your Western media class assets

They soft-launched this relaunch of the rape hoax project three days ago via their propaganda asset Christina Lamb at the Sunday Times, who also played a key role in getting the rape hoax into mainstream legacy media the first time around. She proudly boasts of her initial rape hoax article forcing the BBC, Guardian and others to also do their versions. Hers is along with the Guardian's Bethan McKernan's the most deranged maximalist version of the rape hoax with the most insane fabrications and lies that have all been debunked by every UN report, the AP, Haaretz, NBC News and others, yet still to this day both remain published without any corrections.

I have gone over just some of these depraved lies in both her first and the latest article in this thread, and will have a full detailed breakdown of both soon.

You have to understand why they are now trying to re-launch the rape hoax, who is behind it, and how it will work.

Remember this name because it is the most important and only one you need to know to understand the rape hoax's origins and continuation as a propaganda campaign: Ruth Halperin-Kaddari. She is the person behind the latest rape-hoax revival attempt via her hasbara Israeli regime front organization called "The Dinah Project".

I have a detailed breakdown I put in an infographic that dissects her entire role in all this, as well as her long history of fabricating and repeating all the classic debunked genocidal hoax lies from fetuses cut from beheaded pregnant women's wombs to the burned and beheaded babies.

And you can see more in my posts about her here. And also this article.

To summarize, Ruth Halperin-Kaddari is the person who was assigned by the Israeli regime to be their rape-hoaxer in chief. She literally was hired by the Israeli Foreign Ministry to, in her words, "spread their hasbara" about the rape hoax to the world. She went to the UN and forced her close personal friend of many years Pramila Patten to circumvent all of the UN's rules and do a fake "fact-finding mission" to Israel to help launder the rape hoax for them.

This has never been done in the entire history of the UN. They have never before used the position of Pramila Patten to do a "fact-finding mission", because they are not allowed to by the UN's own rules.

Only the UN's Commission of Inquiry, part of the Human Rights Council, has the legal mandate per UN rules to conduct actual real legally binding investigations.

But the Israeli rape-cult has banned them, and actually passed laws outlawing anyone from even speaking to them.

But it was not enough for Kaddari to have her rape-hoax pushed in the media class by all the legacy outlets, with the crown jewels being the BBC, Guardian and New York Times, all of whom did special interviews with Kaddari herself and were given their marching orders for the rape hoax by her. The BBC has an entire interview with her in a separate article.

What is Kaddari's purpose? Why is she so intent on pushing the rape hoax, and in so doing subverting every UN rule, every law, every media class code of conduct, every basic principle of justice and ethics, journalistic, medical, basic human rights? And yes, I mean basic human rights: As you can see in the infographic and videos I linked before, Kaddari has cited the "confessions" that Palestinians were rape-tortured to death for as legitimate credible evidence for the rape hoax, even though every single human rights organization on earth and the UN have said that those "confessions" were extracted under brutal torture and hence have zero value.

In fact, this is one of the main reasons Israel has desperately avoided bringing any of these cases to trial. Because they know that their rape-torture will come out, and they have zero evidence for any of their genocidal atrocity propaganda claims.

Ruth Halperin-Kaddari is therefore a crucial part of an Israeli Western media and political class led Zionist project to launder, enable and further the ongoing actual mass, documented, systematic pedophilic gang-rape and rape-torture to death of Palestinian children, girls, boys, women and men. And all of this has been confirmed by the actually legally mandated UN reports, as you can see here and here.

But there is another purpose to this. Kaddari and the Israeli rape-cult don't just want to use the rape hoax to launder the ongoing genocide and their actual mass pedophilic gang-rapes, and they know it works particularly well on Western liberals that they need to keep on board as they have focus-tested it.

They also want to use it to push the UN to put Hamas on the blacklist of sexual violence, which will make it impossible for UNRWA or any other UN-affiliated organization or NGO to do any of the lifesaving work they do, providing the essential means for survival in Gaza.

That is why in the latest rape hoax revival attempt Christina Lamb finishes it with a call to get the UN General Secretary to do another fake Patten "fact-finding mission", to do another fake "report", while also demanding he put Hamas on the blacklist of sexual violence.

In other words, they are using the rape hoax to ensure that the genocide is completed.

This makes all those in the Western media and political class who are part of this project, which includes the UK government as they funded Kaddari's new genocidal hasbara "report", directly responsible for the intentional, deliberate, systematic mass murder and pedophilic gang-rape of Palestinians.

Christina Lamb is chiefly responsible for this latest round, because this is how the hasbara propaganda machine works.

They get one of their assets to publish it in a legacy media outlet, like the Sunday Times. This signals to everyone else in the media class that they need to also publish on it and soon. With the initial article, they always get their traditional Zionist tabloid rags to pump it up: Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, New York Post, Daily Mail, The Sun. And of course crucially also Haaretz, which has been intimately involved with every step of the rape hoax and its laundering (while at times inadvertently letting slip information that debunks core parts of it).

All of these immediately boosted the latest round.

Now Sky News asked Francesca Albanese about it ahead of its official launch later today, and she said they will devote their entire show to it.

So CNN's Jake Tapper and/or Dana Bash will do it, the New York Times, BBC, Guardian, Washington Post, AP, Reuters.

I can tell you the names of each person at each outlet who is most likely to write the piece on it. BBC is Lucy Manning or Lucy Williamson, AP is Melanie Lidman, Guardian is Bethan McKernan, Washington Post is Shira Rubin, New York Times is Natan Odenheimer, Adam Sella the food blogger and nephew of genocidal death-cult Mossad agent and disgraced and fired Anat Schwartz, Adam Rasgon, Aaron Boxerman or Ephrat Livni (they have a lot to choose from).

You can watch it all unfold later today and in the next few days as the media class is whipped up into another rape hoax frenzy based on this new bullshit hasbara "report".

As for the report itself, I have looked at the soft-launch of it in the Lamb Sunday Times piece, and they have literally nothing. And they know they have nothing, so they desperately try to pretend they have something but claiming there is some BREAKING NEW EVIDENCE when all they have is the same old deranged genocide-hoaxer "direct eye, ear and nosewitness" claims.

The same "direct eye, ear and nosewitnesses" who said they saw beheaded and burned babies that smelled like barbeque, who said they saw knives and nails in vaginas, who said they saw young girls beheaded and tied to trees and shot in their vaginas, who said they saw broken pelvises with their eyes, who said they saw fetuses cut from pregnant beheaded women's wombs, who said they saw babies hanging from clotheslines, who said they saw breasts cut off and being played with.

These are all claims made in print or on camera by genocidal Zionist hoax-actors who claim they saw, heard and/or smelled these things. Btw, the first time I have heard of such a thing like "earwitnesses" and "nosewitnesses" is in the context of laundering these genocidal atrocity propaganda Zionist hoaxes.

They really are experts at their jobs. They really use the phrase "earwitness", including in the re-launch "report", as if it's a serious thing that everyone knows and accepts. The brazen shamelessness of these sub-human scum really is astounding.

Just turn it around: Imagine if a Palestinian said they heard rape, and they were cited all over Western media as a credible "earwitness" to rape. It's just utterly insane.

You can watch all these genocide-actors with their "first hand testimonies" here:

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1793814678700777742

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1815936930925654090

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1804388742498525433

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1786552208911139012

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1803823726812704806

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1809848528585318730

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1812486355332608333

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1784076774428610699

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1815931371723911402

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1775356305248559218

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1773871846183571613

And then Haaretz let slip that at the Shura Base, where they brought all the bodies from October 7 and performed detailed forensic analyses of them as part of the autopsies, and also the police and paramedics who were doing the initial analysis of the bodies, all found zero evidence of any sexual violence, rape, or genital mutilation. That's not me saying that, that's Haaretz saying it citing the forensic pathologists who actually performed the detailed analyses of each body.

Now I can guarantee you that this new "report" has the same cast of rape-hoax characters cited in it as being credible reliable "witnesses" with "testimonies". Shari Mendes, with her "I saw a fetus cut from a pregnant woman's womb" and "I saw broken pelvises with my eyes, didn't need an x-ray, and I'm a volunteer architect", is likely in there. They will have the ZAKA hoaxers in there, Chaim Otmazgi. They will have "Sapir" and Raz Cohen. All the characters will come back again, and they will have some new cast members too, or cast members they pretend are new but already were reported on with their deranged lies like Aviva Siegel who said she saw KHAMAS "playing with girls like their little Jewish dolls".

That's a favorite line of their btw, another guy who claimed he was gang-raped as he was suing the Israeli state for 137 million dollars because he said he was gang-raped at the Nova festival and used the same line, and he's of course entirely absent from this new report because hey, we can't believe all claimed "survivors". Instead we have the claim of a new "attempted rape" actor that will make a first appearance.

Mia Schem, who was "raped with their eyes" in Gaza and then actually raped in Tel Aviv was likely also scrubbed from the new "report", because the police in Israel has dismissed her rape and covered it up like they systematically do with all their gang-rapes, as Israel is a rape-cult masquerading as a society.

Every genocidal Zionist accusation is of course a confession.

How to recognize and dismantle the genocidal atrocity propaganda rape hoax

If you know the rape hoax intimately in all its dimensions as I do, you will immediately recognize the patterns, the actors playing their roles, the scripts they are reading out, the lines they use, everything is clear as day.

Here is an overview of all the main threads I did debunking every part of the rape hoax from start to finish, and I will do the same with the relaunch of it and all those who laundered it, and also the essential articles that have done the same. Please consider supporting these outlets with whatever means you can. They have done the primary work in dismantling the rape hoax, and they are invaluable. Mondoweiss, Electronic Intifada and Grayzone in particular have been essential.

https://normanfinkelstein.com/pramila-pattens-rape-fantasies-a-critical-analysis-of-the-un-report-on-sexual-violence-during-the-7-october-attack/

https://yesmagazine.org/video/israel-hamas-oct7-report

https://middleeastmonitor.com/20240703-israel-has-manufactured-an-industrial-scale-version-of-jim-crow-rape-hoaxes/

https://electronicintifada.net/tags/hasbara

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/key-7-october-mass-rapes-witness-denounced-liar-israeli-reporter

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/debunking-screams-silence-sheryl-sandbergs-7-oct-mass-rape-film

https://mondoweiss.net/2024/10/how-the-un-commission-of-inquiry-report-on-october-7-launders-israeli-propaganda/

https://mondoweiss.net/2024/03/heres-what-pramila-pattens-un-report-on-oct-7-sexual-violence-actually-said/

https://mondoweiss.net/2024/01/family-of-key-case-in-new-york-times-october-7-sexual-violence-report-renounces-story-says-reporters-manipulated-them/

https://theintercept.com/2024/03/04/nyt-october-7-sexual-violence-kibbutz-beeri/

https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

https://thegrayzone.com/2024/02/22/israeli-hamas-debunked-western-media/

https://thegrayzone.com/2024/03/07/media-concocts-un-hamas-rape-report/

https://thegrayzone.com/2024/03/25/israeli-propagandist-hamas-grifter-fraud/

https://thegrayzone.com/2024/01/10/questions-nyt-hamas-rape-report/

https://thegrayzone.com/2025/04/08/oct-7-hoax-expose-shelved/

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1799119035491295443 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1810622202053583045 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1908281673315475498 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1803819790718394428 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1781072860800274789 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1781115742349349072 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1772365659160068456 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1752103439159447922 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1740547528377114634 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1743405908053414352 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1809842302971441633 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1764771314600952192 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1800826844293501110 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1801248357672734732 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1763072350759612692 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1764854880479424673 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1773869378439725464

In his interview with Ta-Nehisi Coates, Ezra Klein repeatedly—over and over again—launders the ongoing genocide by blaming Palestinians for it. He does this through the term "agency," the favorite liberal and pseudo-intellectual buzzword used to justify all their genocidal mania.

This is the magic of "agency": it turns everything into whatever you want while pretending you are making an objective, fair, and reasonable analytical point. It allows you to posture as intellectually honest and serious. That is who Ezra Klein is. He is the paragon of moral virtue, the quintessential New York Times liberal. He determines what is just and unjust for the world today and throughout history. The Ezra Kleins embody virtue.

So, are Palestinians being subjected to genocide by Ezra Kleins? That, in their moral framework, is virtue. That is moral necessity. That is the height of morality itself.

Why? Because "agency," a pseudo-intellectual concept.

Hamas did it. It's all because of Hamas and the Palestinian resistance. If it weren’t for them and their "agency," there wouldn’t be a genocide right now. And you can’t possibly deny "agency," so you should all agree that the genocide is actually Moral and Good and Civilized.

Here’s the problem, Ezra. Jews had "agency" under Nazi Germany. You can’t deny that. In fact, they had more "agency" in Weimar Germany, leading up to Nazi rule, than Palestinians have ever had under Israeli genocidal apartheid. There were Jewish ministers in government, like Rudolf Hilferding. Jews were leading political figures in major parties like the Social Democrats, which were governing parties. The Weimar Constitution itself was drafted by Jewish lawyer Hugo Preuss. Leading scientists and scholars at the top German universities included Jews like Einstein and Husserl.

There was a ton of "agency" here, right, Ezra? And yet Hitler rose to power. The Nazis took control and instituted anti-Semitic policies that eventually led to the Holocaust.

So, by your logic—the logic you apply to Palestinians who dare resist their genocide, their occupation, their apartheid—you ascribe such great power to "agency" that you make it the causal element behind their destruction. By that standard, Jews in Nazi Germany caused their own genocide. Jews in Weimar had significant agency. There were Jews in the Soviet Union in top positions with agency. Jews in the U.S. had agency. And by your framework, that agency must have causally influenced the rise of the Nazi movement and the broader views of the German public.

You can't deny all that agency. That’s part of reality, right, Ezra? And surely it must have played a role in shaping Nazi ideology, just as you claim Palestinian resistance is responsible for Israeli genocide. The Nazis and a significant portion of the German public believed that Jews wielded their agency in nefarious ways. This mirrors the Israeli Zionist perspective, which holds that Palestinians are sub-human and that their mere resistance justifies extermination.

Yet you refuse to analyze these claims historically. In fact, you explicitly tell Coates that we shouldn’t—that we must engage only with feelings and "lived experiences," which are raw and impervious to real history, facts, and objective reality. We must accept the genocidal Zionist Israeli perspective as the universal reality. Because agency. That is the Israeli agency. Which we also are not allowed to deny.

Why do you not extend that logic to the Nazis and their lived experiences with Jews? The Nazis also had agency. The German public that supported the Nazi movement had agency. They had lived experiences, which, by your own logic, should be considered separate from historical analysis and objective reality—just as you insist we do for Israel’s genocide.

So let’s set aside history for a moment, as you demand we do for your precious Israeli death and rape cult. Let’s apply your own logic to Nazi Germany, which murdered your people, Ezra.

And when we do, we must conclude—by necessity, as dictated by our acceptance of "agency"—that the Jews were responsible for their own genocide, much more so than Palestinians ever could be, given their comparatively lower level of agency leading up to and after the Nakba.

Anyone who says this is a moral monster. They are a Nazi. This is literally what Nazis say, except they didn’t have the pseudo-intellectual, incoherent term "agency" to launder it.

Do you see what the liberal Zionist moral universe actually consists of when you apply it universally, rather than just to their precious genocidal Israeli death and rape cult? When you turn it back on them?

It is literal Nazism. It is pure, unfiltered Nazism. And yes, it is true: Ezra Klein, the good liberal at The New York Times, along with Noah Smith, Matthew Yglesias, Jeffrey Goldberg—all these good liberal Zionists—are modern-day Nazis. And they rule over the US-NATO-Israeli empire, the Fourth Reich.

That is the reality of our situation.

To be clear, everything Ezra Klein says in that interview is a brazen, shameless lie. He paints the Palestinian resistance, including Hamas, as rabid, irrational, sub-human beasts purely out for death and destruction. He inverts reality to launder Zionism, as detailed in this thread, which includes a detailed overview by Colter Louwerse of the many times Hamas has offered a diplomatic resolution including laying down their arms which has been repeatedly refused by Israel:

The same offer was again made last year, and was once again dismissed by everyone including genocidal Zionists like Ezra Klein:

The Ezra Kleins of the world ignore all this, and instead hysterically shout: How dare they resist my Zionist genocide and occupation? How dare they respond to decades of Zionists like me—mass raping, maiming, and killing their babies, children, women, and men—by retaliating in kind? And to such a marginal extent that, when you compare casualty figures to our actual mass killing sprees, their response is barely visible?

No, that’s not how it works. We kill, we rape, we maim. We throw your babies into ovens and then fabricate hoaxes to launder our crimes, making it part of our wedding rituals to take photos of those babies and stab them with knives.

That’s what we Ezra Kleins, Matthew Yglesiases, and Noah Smiths do to you.

And you dare respond? You dare think you are human and allowed to even consider resisting as we occupy, genocide, and rape you to death?

No, that’s not how the Zionist Nazi moral universe works. They are human; you are sub-human.

At one point, Ezra Klein claims that Hamas is worse than Netanyahu. You can only say this if you are a Zionist ethnic supremacist who believes Palestinians, Lebanese, and Yemenis are sub-human. Hundreds of thousands maimed, burned alive, tortured, and raped to death—they're all nothing to Ezra Klein compared to the Palestinian resistance daring to resist occupation, genocide, and apartheid.

At another point, Ezra Klein asserts that Hamas knew what Operation Al-Aqsa Flood would cause—namely, the mass murder and rape of their people—because everyone supposedly knows how genocidal and depraved the Ezra Kleins of the world are. Or at least, they should know—solely when it benefits the hasbara propaganda line that launders genocide by blaming it on Hamas and their so-called "agency," a variation of the classic and depraved "human shields" trope. But by that logic, Ezra Klein and Zionists should have known that their occupation, apartheid, and genocide of Palestinians for a century would lead to Operation Al-Aqsa Flood—ergo, they are morally absolved completely. Especially since every Israeli is actually, by definition, a human shield.

But again, Ezra Klein can't even comprehend applying this as a universal standard, because he is a Zionist Nazi. He believes he and his people—and by "his people," he solely means Zionist Jews—are superior to all other forms of life on this planet, and that those they maim, rape, and kill are sub-human. These are the genocidal Zionist liberal scum who run the liberal New York Times, CNN, AP, Reuters, Guardian, and Washington Post.

Finally, another genocide-laundering lie Ezra Klein constantly repeats in that interview is this myth of a good, virtuous, liberal-left Israel with sincere peace seekers who were thwarted by the evil of Hamas and the Palestinian resistance in the 90s forcing them to become genocidal.

This is yet another brazen shameless lie that liberal genocidal Zionists like Ezra Klein have fabricated and spread to launder their own sadistic pathological bloodlust, and project it onto those they occupy, rape and murder.

Israel has always been a death-cult that has resolutely opposed any peace deal in favor of continuing its occupation, apartheid and genocide, as detailed by Norman Finkelstein and Zbigniew Brzeziński of all people:

Last week a deranged Zionist propagandist smear merchant who is also an incredibly dull talentless hack by the name of Ashley Rindsberg claimed that I was running some massive "Hamas propaganda" network on Reddit. This is entirely fabricated. It's a lie, he knows its a lie, and instead of admitting that he lied, he decided to just now double down on it in yet another unhinged screed he wrote this time focused entirely on me. He claims he has "receipts", even though his own receipts expose his lie. But he hopes that if he can conjure up enough deranged propaganda smears surrounding it, he can deflect attention from the fact that he brazenly and shamelessly lied about me and others being part of some "Reddit Hamas propaganda network".

First of all, he completely ignored that he also lied about the TrueAnon Reddit page being run by some evil Hamas propagandists.

That by itself already establishes Rindsberg as a liar. And I will show how he also lied about me as part of that deranged claim he made.

But before I continue with that, I just want to make clear who Ashley Rindsberg is. He is owned by Mike Solana, himself a fanatical Zionist who is a core part of Peter Thiel's network. In fact, he is referred to Thiel's "protege", i.e. his slave. And for those unfamiliar, Peter Thiel is one of the most odious and depraved genocidal Zionist scum alive, who is behind funding the entire Zionist propaganda apparatus (including Bari Weiss' rag), alongside running the CIA-Mossad Palantir front.

Now I have actual receipts on Ashley Rindsberg being owned by a CIA-Mossad front via Peter Thiel and Mike Solana, and also doing a stint at the Israeli Unit 8200-owned Prager U:

Again, he is the perfect embodiment of every Zionist accusation being a confession. He literally works for a Zionist CIA-Mossad operation, fabricating and disseminating propaganda for them which is then boosted by Israeli troll and bot farms and paid influencers who immediately boost what is otherwise his dead account. Go look at his account and see how his own posts barely get a few likes, but then when he does one of his propaganda operations the Israeli bot/troll/influencer army is unleashed on it and its massively boosted. This is all definitely 100% organic and not astroturfed by a tech billionaire Mossad agent btw.

And what is the propaganda he is tasked to fabricate and spread to smear anyone who is critical of his and Thiel-Solana CIA-Mossad owners' precious genocidal Israeli death and rape-cult?

Claiming that they're all fake, it's all inauthentic, it's all run by Iran, Russia, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, and it's all based on lies. An inactive dormant Reddit account used once to make one post that was immediately deleted was at the center of his deranged claim that I am running a vast Hamas propaganda network on Reddit.

So this deranged smear operation against me is coming from the highest echelons of the Zionist propaganda apparatus, which shows you just how pathetic and desperate they really are that they are obsessed with my account. And to be clear, the sole reason Peter Thiel, Solana and Rindsberg are disseminating these deranged smears about me on behalf of their precious genocidal Israeli death and rape-cult is because they want to get me banned.

Now here is proof that Ashley Rindsberg lied about me having an active Reddit account where I am spreading Hamas propaganda:

After someone sent me his deranged screed about me I went to Reddit, and checked to see if I actually have an account with my email. I did not even know if I had an account. I checked my email, and I was able to login, so yes, I actually do have a Reddit account. But it's an inactive account, not just inactive over the past 8 months, which is when I apparently first made it for reasons I will explain in more detail below (which Rindsberg also lies about), but inactive in general, always, from the very moment I first made it and used it to post one thing that got immediately deleted by the very moderators of the r/Palestine group Rindsberg claims I am coordinating a vast Hamas propaganda network with. Ironically they appear to have deleted it for brigading, which is the very thing Rindsberg lied about that sub-reddit being designed to do.

It literally only has one post on it. I literally only made one post on this account 8 months ago, AND THE POST WAS DELETED BY THE MODERATORS OF THE GROUP RINDSBERG SAYS I AM SPREADING HAMAS PROPAGANDA WITH.

Do you see how these deranged smear artists work? Do you see how easily they lie?

And it's not just that Rindsberg lied. When I replied to him, and called him out on his lie by saying that I do not have an active Reddit account, instead of admitting that he lied, he decided to double down and said: "I have receipts!!!"

Then he went radio-silent for days as his fellow Thiel-Solana-Mossad assets desperately flailed around to find anything, and what did he come up with, alongside another deranged screed about how I'm a Hamas KGB Iranian North Korean Soviet evil monster spy?

A screenshot of the very same inactive dormant Reddit account which only has one post on it that was deleted by the Mods of the group he said I am coordinating with to spread Hamas propaganda.

He even quotes me saying that I don't have an active Reddit account and have never had one, and then posts the screenshot that proves it!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHA And then he just pretend he proved the opposite. He pretends he actually provided receipts for his deranged lie that I am running vast Hamas propaganda network on Reddit!

It's utterly insane. These people are fucking insane.

And to be clear, Ashley Rindsberg did not merely claim that I have a long dormant inactive Reddit account. That would be pointless. His "scoop" in that unhinged screed of his was that he uncovered a massive Hamas propaganda network on Reddit, and he referenced me as being a core part of that effort. So both in the excerpt about me and in the context of the entire piece and then again doubling down on it in his latest screed about me, Rindsberg repeatedly lied about me.

He is a pathological liar who is paid to lie and smear by his Thiel-Solana owners, who are CIA-Mossad assets.

What about the claim that I am a moderator for some evil Hamas propaganda Reddit, this "r/NewsAndPolitics"?

As you can see from my account, that is actually true. Apparently while completely forgetting about it because unlike Rindsberg's deranged lie about me I am not an active Reddit user, I was invited to it 7 months ago, shortly after I made my account, accepted it out of courtesy, and then forget it existed as I never logged back into the Reddit account again.

This is not just a claim I'm making. You can literally see it in the attached screenshots of the account's activity. There is zero moderating activity, zero message activity, zero activity. Nothing. Zero. It is a dormant account. It was only used to post one thing 8 months ago.

Exactly as I said, I do not and have never had an active Reddit account. Rindsberg lied. He is a liar.

Regarding that one post I made, the reason I actually made the account in the first place, and which was immediately deleted by the moderators, ironically exactly because they didn't want brigading even though Rindsberg claims that the r/Palestine subreddit is designed to do that - that post is about the Sheryl Sandberg genocidal atrocity propaganda hoax Youtube video. Here's a detailed thread exposing it as a hoax: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1794446085110345783

Read the description of my post in the screenshot. What am I saying there? I am saying that the Sandberg hoax doc is being artificially boosted by bot and trolls farms on IMDB, who were all suddenly giving it mass 10-star ratings and fake obviously AI generated reviews that all repeated the same stock phrasing.

And they don't just do that with the Sandberg hoax doc, they do it with all their propaganda hoaxes on IMDB.

Go look at any of them, and you will see massive swarms of 10-star ratings and fake 10-star reviews, which is in violation of IMDB rules.

Now Rindsberg's Thiel-Solana CIA-Mossad funded propaganda screeds are all about how any content critical of their precious genocidal Israeli death and rape-cult is fake, inauthentic, inorganic, astroturfed by Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Stalin, Mao, KGB (in his latest screed he actually accused me of using "KGB methods" - this is the level of unhinged maniac he is).

But I don't operate bot armies. I don't have resources to use troll farms. No, that's Rindsberg, Thiel, Solana and Bari Weiss and the Mossad and their plethora of fake bullshit "tech companies" that do that, as has been extensively reported on and I have personally experienced as they have targeted my account (including via weaponizing the Notes system, which Rindsberg lies about me doing):

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1751375751851413730

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1798011441368404061

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1798020857656471771

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1753194175200141428

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1880165547876446425

https://archive.ph/cdr7h

https://archive.ph/H5yBZ

So when I saw the Sandberg hoax video being flooded with fake 10-star ratings and review, exactly the actual inorganic state and billionaire funded astroturfed propaganda campaign Rindsberg claims he cares so much about in his deranged screeds based on nothing but lies as he lied about me and TrueAnon being involved in a vast Hamas Reddit propaganda network that doesn't exist, I went to places where actual people are, not fake accounts, not bots, but actual real living people are, to ask them to write actual real reviews and give real ratings to the hoax doc so as to counter the artificial fake inorganic propaganda operation that Rindsberg and his owners Thiel and Solana and the CIA-Mossad run.

One of these places was the r/Palestine Reddit account, and I made an account solely to make that one post, which again was deleted by the moderators.

Now I also went to some Discord servers, whatever I could find by searching for variations of "Palestine discord". And, as Rindsberg notes, I of course also posted it on my own Telegram.

But this proves exactly that Rindsberg's entire narrative is pure deranged Zionist huckstery. Because I wasn't hiding that. I wasn't going around in DMs and using second and third accounts with different names to post that. Why would I? Countering a troll and bot army rating spree on IMDB with ratings and comments by real people is exactly what should be done if you actually care about opposing inorganic, astroturfed propaganda operations creating a false image of mass support for something that doesn't exist in reality.

But Rindsberg creates this air of fake mystique and conspiracy, this hidden network, KGB-esque, Iranian IRGC, North Korean special ops -- motherfucker, I'm literally posting it on my own Telegram under my own username. You deranged propagandist freak.

In his latest screed Rindsberg says that I love to say that every Zionist accusation is a confession.

Yes, I do love to say it, because it's true, and Rindsberg himself is the perfect embodiment of it: A pathological liar who inverts reality and accuses others of what he and his CIA-Mossad Thiel-Solana handlers and owners are actually guilty of.

Lies, lies, and more lies

It really is amazing how brazenly and shamelessly Rindsberg lies. He knows anyone can easily see that he is lying, but he does it anyway. Because his Thiel-Solana Zionist tech billionaire owners will boost whatever deranged Zionist screeds he fabricates. Look at him claiming that I threatened him, as if I sent him a death threat. But then you look at the actual full post he quotes from, and I'm referring to knowing that he is lying about the "receipts" he claimed he had of me running a vast Reddit Hamas propaganda network. And of course I was right.

Also after saying he doesn't lurk in my discord server he adds a screenshot from the server. LOL

The lying is actually insane. Here he is bizarrely claiming that Ethan Klein and Destiny are Twitch streamers. Neither of them are. He also refers to them as two of the biggest streamers. They are not even close to being among the biggest streamers. He just makes shit up constantly. He doesn't even do a basic google search.

This deranged cunt calls himself an "investigative journalist". And then he defends Destiny after he was just outed for being a sex creep who taped women without their consent and then sent those tapes to others without their consent. Ashley Rindsberg, the brave defender of sex criminals and creeps. By the way, his master Peter Thiel is of course linked to Epstein’s sex cult, so that’s why he had to particularly focus on that. Want to appease master after all, like the reek he is.

I'm going to write a separate post on this because his lies are just fucking insane. Literally every claim he makes is a lie. Every single thing he says is a lie. Here he says that I run a huge massive pro-Hamas propaganda operation, but not just on twitter, where I have the most followers and am actually consistently active, but also on Reddit, which as I proved is a pure fabrication, a pure deranged lie; Wikipedia, which again is a pure lie, I have never had an account there, not even an inactive and dormant one; Substack, where I barely ever post; Discord, where I recently made my own server that I'm starting to get more active on but which is tiny, and I am not active on any other Discord servers (this is another deranged lie from his screed, which he only backs up by posting one screenshot of the same Sandberg IMDB from over 8 months ago as he lies that I am constantly active there); and then he bizarrely adds a screenshot from my Youtube account WHICH HAS BEEN INACTIVE FOR OVER A YEAR, AND ONLY HAS A FEW VIDEOS FROM 3 YEARS BACK THAT BARELY GOT ANY VIEWS.

He can't just say that I run a twitter account with a decent following. That's not enough for his Thiel-Solana Mossad handlers. He has to fabricate a vast conspiracy, a huge network that I'm running, even though anyone can see for themselves that twitter is the only place I'm actually active on (I wish I had more time to be active on the other platforms!).

Every Zionist accusation is a confession

Rindsberg ends his deranged screed by repeating his proven lies, and saying they are facts. Look at his language. He says I have an active Reddit account, and am actively, "intensively" involved on those Discord servers. Actively, intensively. Is a Reddit account made 8 months ago with 1 post, deleted immediately by the mods of the very server he claims I am coordinating with, which has zero messages, zero activity, nothing aside from that 1 post -- is that having an "active Reddit account" that is part of coordinating a vast Hamas propaganda network?

No. He is a liar.

For the Discord server claim, I said the exact same thing: I do not have active accounts on those severs, and have never had active accounts there. By active, it means you post there at least semi-regularly. You're actively a part of them. This is not only my own and the commonsensical definition, but also Rindsberg's, as he says that I am actively in those servers to "intensively" coordinate activity.

But that's impossible. I haven't posted in either of those servers since the middle of last year, as his own screenshots, his epic "receipts", show. And they were about the IMDB swarming by Zionist bot and troll farms, and asking if there were any attempts to counter Zionist propaganda on Wikipedia on the Tech For Palestine server, which didn't lead to anything as the platform is designed to be owned by Zionists in a myriad of ways. I have detailed this before not on some super-secret hidden Discord server (which are all publicly available), but on my twitter account.

Is posting a few messages on a Discord server nearly a year ago "actively intensively coordinating" on them not in the past tense, but currently, right now, as Rindsberg claimed about me?

No. He is a liar.

And then of course he ends with the classic: "THE SQUIRREL IS AN ANTI-SEMITE, THE SQUIRREL HATES JEWS."

That's the only thing they have. That's the only smear they know they can always rely on. Conflating their precious genocidal Israeli death and rape-cult with all Jews, and then saying if you dare criticize Israel, you must clearly hate Jews and be an evil Anti-Semite.

This is how Ashley Rindsberg, the South African who moved to Tel Aviv and then became owned by Solana-Thiel and Prager U-Israeli Unit 8200, makes his living. A zionist smear merchant, and an incredibly lazy, trite, pathetic, and profoundly stupid one at that.

So I thought it would be helpful to put all these detailed deconstructions of these incoherent liberal genocidal Zionist “lesser evilism” talking points into one place ahead of the election tomorrow.

Table of contents

Introduction

AOC and the pseudo-radical liberal smearing of anti-genocide third party candidates by appealing to “political realism” and “strategy” over “purism” and “moralism”, Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Bernie Sanders’s incoherent “lesser evil” propaganda and the how politics and power actually works

AOC and the simplistic utilitarian case for “lesser evilism”: If we don’t support the Democrat, things will only get worse in every respect, ergo we must support them!

Even Netanyahu believes Kamala Harris is the “lesser evil” and prefers Trump, so why should we not back her? Are you backing Netanyahu’s candidate?

Yes but still Netanyahu prefers Kamala Harris!!!

Liberal pseudo-radicals do not actually believe in “lesser evilism”, as they never apply it to any other context aside from advancing their personal careers in the media and political class by browbeating everyone into submission to them during elections, Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

The fundamental incoherence and inanity of the foundation of utilitarian “lesser evilism” pseudo-logic masquerading as hyper-rational realistic political analysis, Part 1

Part 2

Introduction

Everything Lawrence O'Donnell says here is a truism that no one can deny:

My position on the US election, based on that truism, is: Never, under any circumstances, lend your support or vote to liberals, especially not when they are actively laundering, justifying, funding and arming the genocidal mass rape and killing of entire peoples.

Kamala Harris is, as I have repeatedly called her, a Genocidal Zionist Rape Queen, who gleefully laundered video footage of rape-tortured Palestinians at the White House, campaigns with and touts the endorsements of Bush regime scum like Liz and Dick Cheney who instituted vast networks of pedophilic mass rape in Iraq and Afghanistan, and has regurgitated the rape hoax in every interview and speech she has given so as to justify the ongoing genocide and actual rape of Palestinian babies, children, girls, boys, women and men, about which she has not said a single word.

Moreover, as I have also detailed, and can also be read here, Harris began her political career covering up and enabling pedophilic mass rape, which conservatives haven’t said a word about because it involves the Catholic Church.

But the pseudo-radical soc dem liberal progressive then comes in and says: Yes, but she is the “lesser evil”, and it is both our moral and strategic obligation to support and vote for her as such. The very nature of politics and how it “really works” demands us to do this. If you don’t abide by these imperatives, then you’re just a grifter, a liar, stupid, irrational, incapable of grasping four-dimensional political chess as the real world dictates.

So “lesser evilism” has both a moral but crucially also a fake “realist strategic” aspect to its justification scheme. They don’t just morally browbeat you into submission by going “OMG WHAT ABOUT THE GREATER HARM YOU WILL CAUSE BY BEING A PURIST”, they also pretend there’s a strategic rational dimension to it.

Both are patently false, absurd, incoherent garbage, and in fact they are so obviously deranged that it is sickening that anyone dares even pretend otherwise, and the sole reason they can do so is because they are the actual grifters who know that refusing to back Democrats and liberals will lead to career suicide in the media class.

So here is my detailed deconstruction of “lesser evilism”, from its foundational in simplistic utilitarian pseudo-logic, to its extension into the realm of US Presidential politics.

Everything Lawrence O'Donnell says here is a truism that no one can deny:

AOC and the pseudo-radical liberal smearing of anti-genocide third party candidates by appealing to “political realism” and “strategy” over “purism” and “moralism”, Part One (link to thread)

When AOC was a candidate she said: "If you're a one-term Congressmember, so what? You can make ten years' worth of change in one term, if you're not afraid."

Then she became a Democratic Party shill whose job it is to launder Genocide Joe and Zionist Queen Kamala Harris

When AOC was running for office she dismissed attempts by Democrats to blame Hillary's loss on Russia, Jill Stein, the weather, saying instead that they themselves are to blame for being a neoliberal corporate party. Now she shills for genocidal neoliberal Kamala with utter glee.

Listen to AOC before she was elected, and listen to her now. Before she was elected, she didn't blame Jill Stein and the Greens for Democrats losing elections and "enabling Trump". No, she did the opposite: She blamed Democrats for being systematically corrupt neoliberals who have nothing to offer people, have ignored and neglected the working class for decades in favor of serving ruling elites, and in doing so gave rise to Trump.

And in fact, she kept saying over and over again that if the Democratic Party does not fundamentally change from being such a corporatist neoliberal party, it would only enable Trump further and give rise to future Trumps.

Then she was elected and showered with glowing coverage by swooning liberals and received pushback from them whenever she stepped out of line, and decided to become yet another Dem Party shill with pseudo-radical rhetoric on the occasional insta live.

And now she's safe in her seat and preparing for that Senate run and then on to a Presidential run with stints at Colbert and Met Gala appearances and Vogue covers helping her pass the time, with every passing moment becoming ever more like Hillary, "mama bear" Nancy Pelosi (yes, she actually called her that, look it up), and of course her fav momala Zionist Genocide Queen Kamala Harris.

That entire rhetoric AOC has adopted is being hilariously read as an epic based 12 dimensional chess move by pseudo-radicals online, even though it's pure Bill Clinton and Tony Blair. Go read Blair's speeches before he was elected, it's exactly the same.

AOC and the pseudo-radical liberal smearing of anti-genocide third party candidates by appealing to “political realism” and “strategy” over “purism” and “moralism”, Part Two (link to thread)

The line from this deranged rambling mess that all the pseudo-radicals are quoting from their cult leader AOC, "we have a moral obligation to be EFFECTIVE in addition to having a just stance", is just pure liberal centrist rhetoric and self-justification. It's pure Bill Clinton and Tony Blair. And they're celebrating this as a huge novel thought by their epic based yaaas kween AOC.

For those unaware: The standard ideological justification for liberal centrism, when the neoliberals took over the Democrats and Labour, was to argue against the left in the parties that yes, their heart is in the right place, they have the "right stance", but they keep losing to the Reagans and Thatchers, so it's pointless to have those stances as you lose anyway (of course notice there's zero material analysis of why these elections were lost in the first place, and whenever neoliberal centrists lose it is never an indictment of their entire ideology of mimicking Republicans/Tories, then suddenly the "BE EFFECTIVE" line drops away).

So what should be done according to neoliberals on both sides of the Atlantic? We should throw all those principles away, only adopt the vague rhetoric of it with zero foundation in actual policy, become neoliberal shills, adopt the language of the "mythical center" that "appeals to the average person and voter", and then we will finally be able to "BE EFFECTIVE", to quote AOC, and win elections.

Isn't that also the perfect encapsulation of what AOC is now, and has been for quite some time?

And that's also how Tony Blair and Bill Clinton took over their respective parties and made them neoliberal clones of the Republicans and Tories.

And to this very day Blairites and Clintonites in both parties use this same line against the left. That's literally the line they used to destroy Bernie with and also Corbyn: You can't just have the just feel-good stances, you have to "BE EFFECTIVE". And of course we, like AOC and her disgusting vile lies to cover up for the ongoing Gaza Genocide being committed by Genocide Joe and Kamala, are the only ones who know what "BEING EFFECTIVE" entails. The anti-imperialist principled left can't possible "be EFFECTIVE" even though its policies have support among the majority of the population and Democrats/Labour voters.

AOC won't demand that her fav epic Zionist Genocide Queen calls for an arms embargo to actually get a permanent ceasefire even though it is widely popular among the Dem base and has majority support among the broader public, even though that means "BEING EFFECTIVE", because that entire line is just a cover for laundering genocidal right-wing neoliberalism in the hands of liberals, and now also AOC.

AOC's sole purpose in life is to ensure that she can become Senator, and then run for President, and then write her name in history as "the first epic based yaaas kween Latinx President". That's all she cares about, and she will do anything, she will launder a genocide, to get there. That is how vile she is as a human being. How depraved she is.

But there's a problem for AOC and other depraved pseudo-radical liars like her who are laundering the ongoing Gaza genocide to advance their personal political careers. No matter what they say, this is a truism, and the only way to actually "BE EFFECTIVE": https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1826705116784717999

To be clear when AOC did her DNC speech and said that Kamala is "working tirelessly" to get a ceasefire, she was intentionally, deliberately lying to advance her personal political career, and Ilhan Omar exposed her for the disgusting depraved liar she is: https://x.com/akela_lacy/status/1826302251113349500

Stop babying this disgusting cynical lying scumbag piece of shit. All these fucking pseudo-radical larpers are like "uwu AOC is kinda sorta right uwuwuwuw" like she's a fucking baby. She is a calculated lying scumbag piece of fucking shit. Look at her: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1781865144085094406

AOC has repeatedly smeared anti-genocide protesters, who are the most moral people in the West, as evil anti-Semites, solely to get a 0.1% boost to her PR ratings among liberals for her Senate run by not getting that ADL-AIPAC hit. She is pure scum: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1711747161564512483

Just days ago she laundered an Israeli baby killing pedophile rapist to again get a boost to her future Senate run by appeasing AIPAC and the ADL. "I'm being pragmatic and epic strategic by laundering Zionist rape-soldiers." 14 year old: "OMG YAAAS KWEEN": https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1826085920472265157

I'll just end with this: I know it breaks the hearts of irrelevant liberal pseudo-radical wonk-cunts like James Medlock and Matthew Sitman, who fortunately no one has or ever will hear of, but AOC is not going to be President. Yes, she will run. She will run multiple times. And she will be destroyed so easily in the primary that it will make Kamala Harris' 2020 run look like one of the best primary campaigns in history.

AOC and the pseudo-radical liberal smearing of anti-genocide third party candidates by appealing to “political realism” and “strategy” over “purism” and “moralism”, Part Three (link to thread)

Before AOC being a Nancy Pelosi clone singularly obsessed with becoming Senator and then running for President (which she will lose so badly it will make Kamala's 2020 run look like the best campaign in history), her argument was that it was the responsibility of the Democratic Party to not move so far to the right as to push left progressive voters either into abstaining from elections or voting Green.

That's literally what she said in response to why Hillary Clinton lost in 2016. She didn't blame Jill Stein. She didn't blame "the Greens who only come around during general elections and are predatory."

But she has now fully adopted the talking points of Hillary Clinton/Nancy Pelosi because that's what she is. That's her main goal in life, to become "brat", to become the next Latinx version of Queen Kamala after her run is over.

And again it's the neoliberal rhetoric of "we are really serious about power, but not these dirty hippie vile leftists that aren't Democrats like us who bow to our anointed Dear Leaders. They're unserious and predatory."

Do you know what's predatory and rapey from AOC, since we're going to use language like that?

When she lies to her teenage early twenties ignorant audience by saying "Queen Kamala is working tirelessly to end the genocide" that she actively funds and arms and has pledged to forever support, as she is totally beholden to the Zionist Israeli rape-cult, and since AOC is giving cover to her by lying, that means she is also beholden to it. Hence the rapey part. AOC loves to continue the rape of Palestinian children, girls, boys, women and men. That's why she poses with the relatives of Israeli genocidal baby-killing rape-soldiers: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1826085920472265157

And as I have said before just recently, this neoliberal rhetoric of "we are the serious ones about power" (see https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1829430798056878578) is even more deranged and absurd when you consider that AOC's own political project, per her own stated terms, has been an abysmal failure.

The AOC theory of change was we will build more and more members of "the squad", and take over the Democratic Party, and I will devote all my energy to that such that even if I lose after one term it will have been worth it (see https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1826087733292577028).

Instead of "growing" that "power", let alone utilizing it in the one moment when she and they could have for example to prevent Nancy Pelosi from becoming speaker again or blocking crucial votes to get their own policies passed or at least voted on which she refused to do for "epic based million dimensional chess power" reasons, what has happened to her precious "squad"?

It just lost two of its key members, Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman. The only thing AOC did to try to avert that was do last-minute epic rallies that only disgusted everyone even more.

What happened to your epic based TikToks and Instagrams lives there? Why weren't you able to save them? Why weren't you able to "build power" per your own theory of change, but instead lost it?

No, she's not interested in "building power", she is interested in becoming the first based epic Latinx President. That's her life's mission now. She became intoxicated by those invites to the Met Gala and Stephen Colbert and those Vogue and Time Magazine covers. She's a celebrity now. She's our celebrity epic based Nancy Pelosi queen.

You can watch all those deranged ukro-Nazi flag rose emoji loser cucks swooning over her, "OMG YAAAAS KWEEN YAAS LIE TO US MORE ABOUT HOW KAMALA WILL END THE GENOCIDE YAAAAS NEXT PRESIDENT YALL YALL I WAS NOT FAMILIAR WITH HER GAME YALL".

Everyone in the US despises these people, and there will be no greater actual joy than watching brat Kamala lose the election, and then AOC YAAAAS KWEEN lose her primary. Those are two of the events I greatly look forward to in the coming years.

Btw, just to show how much of a disgusting liar AOC really is: The point of a left of Dem candidate running in the general is to act as a pressure point to prevent predator rapey Democrats like AOC from going even further to the right: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1826705116784717999

It would of course be great if the Green Party or any party for that matter was more effective, but AOC and other rapey neoliberal Dem establishment predators like her only bring this up as an excuse to launder the genocidal rapey Zionists she demands unending fealty to.

AOC wants her followers to vote for rape of Palestinian children, that's who AOC is. That's the kind of rapey disgusting depraved scumbag she is, she is laundering rape right now. That's her sole purpose in life, to launder pedophilic child rape, and she does it by lying about what the purpose of a left of Dem run in the general is.

Let's imagine rapey predator AOC got her way, and Jill Stein and Cornel West and the PSL weren't running in the general. It was just the Democrats, and everyone to the left of them pledged total fealty to Democrats. All those Michigan voters, the anti-genocide voters, they all made no demands, they pledged total obedience to rapey predators like AOC and Kamala.

Do you know Kamala's DNC speech that was already a genocide-laundering pro-pedophilic child rape mess? It would have been even worse than that. They would have invited AIPAC speakers at the DNC every night. They would have laundered the rape hoax every minute of the convention to launder the actual mass pedophilic rape of Palestinian children.

And AOC would have still come one to participate in all that, and lie even more brazenly about how great momala is and how she's the best most radical epic based queen alive. Every single day momala would come out with even more deranged Republican policies than she is currently, and even more insane Zionist genocide-laundering. Because there's zero pressure from the left. There is no Jill Stein, there is no West, there is no PSL, exactly like rapey predator AOC wants.

So the ideal scenario for AOC is an even more disgusting genocidal pedophilic rapist Zionist death cult candidate and Party running in the general than is already the case.

She calls this "building power" and "being serious".

also, anyone who chooses this moment to call Jill Stein a "crank" and smear the Green Party, isn't expressing an actual criticism based on reason and facts, they're electioneering for the genocidal Zionist yaas kween pedophile-rape lover Kamala/Walz campaign. So all those Twitch streamers and Youtubers doing the "LOL BUT JILL STEIN IS WEIRD THOUGH LOL LOL" are doing free advertisement for the pedophile-rape Zionist campaign of Kamala Harris. And they're doing it consciously, intentionally, for that very purpose.

Do you know what makes a person a "crank"? When they give speeches at AIPAC as a black woman saying they have loved Israel since their earliest childhood, when they went around homes raising money for it: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1815165619291013301

Now I know Kamala is lying when she says that. She did not go around homes raising money for Israel. That's fucking insane. But imagine just how much of a deranged pathological crank you have to be to say that in public at a speech to advance your personal political career.

How about when someone goes on the DNC stage and lies about how Kamala is "working tirelessly to get a ceasefire", which is a lie because Kamala has vowed to never stop arming and funding the Israeli death and pedophilic rape-cult, which is the only means by which the genocide can be stopped, as Ilhan Omar pointed out: https://x.com/akela_lacy/status/1826302251113349500

That's a crank. A person who does that is a deranged pathological crank. A predatory rapey crank I should add, and her name is AOC.

Claiming you care about rape and sexual violence as you pledge endless funding and arming of a regime that has been confirmed to systematically engage in pedophilic mass child rape, makes you a rapey predatory crank.

Claiming you care about averting the existential threat posed by climate change as you support endless fracking makes you a deranged crank. Celebrating your history of a "tough law and order prosecutor" as you claim to care about the systematically racist legal and prison system, makes you a crank.

Kamala Harris and AOC are among the most grotesque depraved predatory rapey cranks in US politics right now, and they're deflecting it onto Jill Stein and the Greens. It's a copy of the Zionist strategy of every accusation being a confession, unsurprising coming from genocidal predatory rapey Zionists.

Bernie Sanders’s incoherent “lesser evil” propaganda and the how politics and power actually works (link to thread)

Politics is a game of pressure, of force, exerting your influence. The Zionist Israel lobby and others know this very well and play it accordingly: If you cross us, we will use all our leverage against you. If in response to that you lay down all your arms, and say: Ok, we won't use our leverage, our pressure, our ability to hurt you in elections, we won't wage war on you ever when it actually matters and power is being contested during the only moments you care about, these precious spectacles every 4 years, then you automatically lose.

You have nothing. You have already conceded. You have literally nothing.

Bernie knows that. AOC knows that. They all know this, because it is a truism. If Kamala only gets pressure from the Zionist Israel lobby with its immense power and influence to keep the genocide going, to ensure that every day countless Palestinian babies, children, boys, girls, women and men are beheaded, maimed and raped to death, and on the other side there is only Jill Stein and Cornel West and some other marginal third party people, guess who wins in that struggle?

Just listen to her speeches and pronouncements which is a reflection of this balance of forces, and you know who they consider is the more powerful force.

They have calculated: "Alright, Stein, West, the TikTok anti-genocide crowd, we'll some votes from them, definitely, because they are seeing a genocide being livestreamed on a daily basis.

But is it worth their loss? We have Bernie, we have AOC, they're all preventing that dam from breaking for us with their pseudo-radical posing and smears and vile attacks on them, so we can take that hit.

We definitely can't take the hit from the Israel lobby, they have a lot more power versus them, so we'll just keep the genocide and mass rape going."

Do you know what fundamentally changes that calculation such that it will force them to give concessions and accept that they will use their leverage to end the genocide?

If Bernie and AOC and the entire "squad" (whatever is left of it) and the progressive caucus even came out and said: This is our red line. Give us a firm commitment that you will abide by international law, by US law, and by basic minimum moral integrity and humanity and stop the mass murder and rape of Palestinian children, or we will all come out and say that you should not be supported in the election, ensuring your loss.

Then suddenly the power between the Zionist Israel lobby and the anti-genocide movement is equalized, and Kamala's choice, the choice of the Dem establishment, will be clear: Will we lose definitely and keep the genocide going? Or will we adopt the position that the majority of the population wants, and commit to ending the genocide.

Whatever they choose, it is on them what happens, and the anti-genocide movement, actually showed that it believes what it says about the ongoing Gaza genocide and gave the Democratic party a red line: Here and no further. We will not let you do genocide and get away with it, which will stand as a firm line into the future.

If you abandon it, and they actually win the election with the Zionist Israel lobby backing them, the opposite is conformed to them: We must always, under any circumstances, even during a genocide, stand by the Israel lobby because that guarantees a win for us. The left is a joke, they are easily dismissed by our Bernie and AOC lapdogs who smear and pose and get us that segment of votes.

Again, Bernie and AOC know all this, and yet they choose to not use their very real leverage and power to stop a genocide, and instead to continue it.

Every beheading, maiming and rape of Palestinians is on them as much as it is on Genocidal Zionist Rape Queen Kamala and the entire Democratic establishment and liberal media and political class.

For more on the genocidal Zionist depravity of Bernie Sanders see these threads:

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1851258476418240642

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1734079340185276456

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1721316148350701936

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1759718906095141223

AOC and the simplistic utilitarian case for “lesser evilism”: If we don’t support the Democrat, things will only get worse in every respect, ergo we must support them! (link to thread)

One of the common talking points used to defend Democrats and the line of pseudo-argument that AOC deploys, which someone again posted in the replies here, is the whole "utilitarian calculus" type of "lesser evilism": We have to vote Democrats/Labour/[insert neoliberal party] forever and always, because the alternative can only be worse as we know by our rational, logical calculated political projection into the future, both in the short and long term.

This was my response to them:

I'll write a longer post on this because this is the typical talking point that's trotted out as if it means anything, even though I have addressed it before at great length (see threads linked here: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1296491447227645952).

But just to summarize: Any argument that relies on a future projection of politics extending into 4 to 8 years or even longer, with the assumption that it can be perfectly or even remotely closely predicted, and hence you can do a simple utilitarian calculus of X being superior to Y in the present, is intrinsically and empirically false.

Not only is it empirically false, but anyone who decides their political action in the present based on such a false calculus is either intentionally lying, or just ignorant. I don't know in which category you belong, that's for you to decide.

Just to give one recent example: When Ed Miliband, who was seen as being on the left end of the Blairite establishment neoliberal spectrum, lost the election in 2015, everyone thought based on current utilitarian calculations that a further right neoliberal would become the next Labour leader. The "left" had clearly failed, the entire media and political class blamed Miliband's supposedly "left" politics for the failure, so obviously Labour members would now flock to a out and out Blairite who promised a lurch to the right with ironically the exact same language as AOC is deploying right now: We need to be serious about power, we need to build power, we need to win elections, we have a moral obligation to win otherwise nothing matters, etc. etc., that's just pure Bill Clinton Tony Blair self-justifying rhetoric and of course it's unsurprising that now their heir in the US AOC has adopted it.

If you were in the UK in 2013/2014/2015, you would have said the same thing you're saying now in your post in reply to me: What if Ed Miliband loses, and the Tories win, and Labour goes only further right? Is that the "better result" you wanted? Wow, that's so terrible. You're so terrible.

Except you were wrong. Your utilitarian calculus was empirically false, because the entire mechanism doesn't work. It only has the pretense of being a pristine perfect logical rational calculation machine, but in the real world (incidentally this is the problem with utilitarianism in moral philosophy as well), it collapses upon first contact with reality.

Because no one can predict what happens in politics, an intrinsically contingent category of human activity.

What ended up happening is that Jeremy Corbyn ran for the Labour leadership after Miliband as what everyone thought was a joke candidacy which would obviously lose to the very serious good neoliberal Blairites like Liz Kendall and Yvette Cooper. Except Corbyn won quite easily despite all the media smears, and Kendall and Cooper got low single digit votes.

But you would have determined your entire political calculus in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 based on the idea that if Ed Miliband wasn't fully supported and voted for, everything would be lost for the left forever. And you would have been wrong.

Now this example can be reproduced in every recent political context, say the recent French election, the US primaries post Hillary's loss but also the 2016 primary, etc.

The reason for this is because every political moment produces its own active forces that hitherto were inactive and not present, and no one can predict their nature in advance, and it can arise at any moment with great speed and force. In fact, one can make a very good argument, though this would also be purely speculative like your pseudo-calculus is, that a loss for Kamala in the upcoming election will lead to a mass mobilization of the left that can successfully take a shot at power in the 2028 primary, and in the period before expand the electoral left's presence in Congress (remember, AOC and the squad only appeared post-2016 Hillary's loss, and she explicitly framed herself as a result of that loss and what was needed for the Dem Party to recover from it, namely to abandon its failed neoliberal policies. Just watch this interview:

Isn't that ironic btw? The person you are now defending, AOC, the entire squad, the only reason they even exist is because Hillary lost the 2016 election which led to a reflection among liberals to be more open to progressive-left anti-establishment candidates and voices internally. So your calculus, brought back to 2016 ahead of the general, would have led to AOC not even existing right now.

Do you see why this entire line of reasoning only has the pretense of being rational and logical when in reality it is the exact opposite?

Now again, this can only be denied if one is lying, or ignorant of it. I have now explained it empirically to you that it is a factual matter that this is how politics works in the real world, so if you continue to deny it only one option remains as to why you do so.

Even Netanyahu believes Kamala Harris is the “lesser evil” and prefers Trump, so why should we not back her? Are you backing Netanyahu’s candidate? (link to thread)

Already replied to this in detail in the thread below, and you ignored it because you can't answer why David Frum, Bill Kristol, Jeffrey Goldberg, Reid Hoffman, Anne Applebaum, Bill Maher, Sam Harris, all want Genocidal Zionist Rape Queen Kamala to win.

This is not particularly difficult. Why do David Frum, Bill Kristol, Jeffrey Goldberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Haim Saban, Reid Hoffman, Joe Scarborough, Dick and Liz Cheney, basically the entire fanatical genocidal neo-con Zionist media, political and billionaire class want Kamala to win? They have the exact same view as Netanyahu and his regime, so why are they pumping Kamala's campaign full of cash and endorsing her if they don't want her to win? The disagreements over whether Trump or Kamala wins among fanatical genocidal Zionists is like the disagreements between what the best tactical move is in the Nazi high command in 1941. There is no daylight there.

Netanyahu doesn't give a fuck if Kamala wins instead of Trump, he owns her just as he owns Trump. The only difference is that Kamala will maybe occasionally do the rehearsed "Palestinians are kind of human too maybe sort of, btw they're all barbaric sub-human rapists", and the only material effect of that is to help more effectively launder the ongoing genocide and mass rape of Palestinians.

If Kamala is president, she will as she has vowed repeatedly over and over again, gleefully continue the ongoing Gaza genocide and mass rape of Palestinian babies, children, girls, boys, women and men (see https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1827034919064736234).

In fact, if she wins the election after having explicitly made that vow, she and establishment Democrats and their liberal media class hangers-on will only be further emboldened to double down on the genocide even more, and drop the second half of that sick grotesque genocide-laundering script, "ummm maybe they sort of deserve self-determination lol lmao btw remember they're all sub-human rapists!!!" A script given to her that she reads off dutifully every time she's asked about the ongoing genocide and mass rape of Palestinians that is the exact copy of Genocide Joe's script: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1827032583479435730

A script that btw is worse than what George Bush used to say. He actually referred to the occupation explicitly: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1823246051236606427

Meanwhile Kamala's first act in the Senate, after expressing and vowing her lifelong loyalty to AIPAC, was to condemn the Obama admin for not vetoing a UN resolution condemning settlements in illegally occupied territory: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1815178908263686297

In fact, Kamala winning will only make the genocide all the more effective, because now it's a black woman who is justifying and laundering it as all the liberals swoon over her. "OMG BASED YAAAAS KWEEN BEHEAD AND RAPE THOSE PALESTINIAN BABIES AND CHILDREN KWEEEN YAAAAS YAAAS". Obama redux, except she's infinitely more fanatical and deranged in her Zionist mania. She is the Genocidal Zionist Rape Queen: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1843287572719730718

None of this is speculative or hypothetical, it's purely descriptive and empirical: Just look at the last year and how Genocide Joe and Kamala, in their most vulnerable position politically as they are heading for a tight election, did not bow an inch, not one inch to the anti-genocide mass movement, but in fact spit in their faces repeatedly, over and over again, with utter glee.

No, you will not speak at the DNC. No, we will not acknowledge the actual documented mass rape of Palestinians by the same Israeli pedophile rape-soldiers we fund and arm, as we smear and dehumanize every Palestinian as a sub-human barbaric rapist every single time we talk about them.

No, we will not adhere to any of the pathetic "red lines" we set out as Netanyahu breaks them over and over again and we leak these bullshit "BIDEN SAID FUCK HIM IN PRIVATE OMG OMG" talking points to all the more effectively launder the genocide we fully and unconditionally fund and arm.

They have said that they are perfectly happy to throw the election, as long as their Zionist donors and the genocidal Zionist rape and death-cult, is fully safe and secure to do what it wants, to behead, maim, and rape the entire Palestinian people, and now also the Lebanese, Yemenis, Iraqis and soon the Iranians.

If this is how they behave at their politically most vulnerable and weakest moment, how do you imagine they will behave if they win on with this campaign?

Yeah, I'm sure they'll suddenly see the light and start listening to the anti-genocide mass movement half of which will join the swooning brigade over the "first black woman who has to be given a chance!" once there is nothing on the line for them anymore.

A final point, and a very important one: There is now in Congress a small set of people who are critical of Israel and the genocide, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, you can even include AOC in that if you like despite her gleeful laundering of genocidal Israeli rape-soldiers and smearing of anti-genocide protesters (see https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1826085920472265157).

As I have pointed out in detail before in the threads below, how did these people get into Congress in the first place? They got into Congress in the post-2016 period as a direct consequence of Hillary's loss. The loss of the Democratic establishment in 2016 is what gave them all, including AOC as she explicitly ran on a campaign calling this out, the chance to become elected and get into Congress:

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1834697769166291030 https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1829430798056878578

If Trump had won in 2016, there would be no AOC. There would be no Ilhan Omar. There would be no Rashida Tlaib. It is only because Genocide Joe and Kamala were heading the Democratic party that liberals began swooning over their supposed power and security and "we need to go moderate and safe now", and got rid of Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush and are ready to replace Omar, Tlaib and the others who remain principled with another black-face genocidal Zionist copy of Kamala.

So again, none of the things I'm saying are hypothetical of speculative. We have actual recent history proving it, demonstrating it. It's empirical fact that liberals are more than happy to sit back and watch the mass genocidal slaughter and rape of an entire people, as long as it's done by their side, by a Kamala YAAAS KWEEN or Joe ice-cream eating grandpa.

Actually I have another point that is essential. How will the liberal base, and by this I don't mean the aforementioned genocidal Zionist media-pundit and political class who will never abandon Zionist fanaticism, I mean the average Democratic voter, how will they react to the fact that Netanyahu handed the election to Trump?

You see that's where the Netanyahu side of the Nazi high command in 1941 has a tactical disagreement with the David Frum wing. The latter believe that the only reason there is so much anti-Israel sentiment in the political space in the first place is exactly because the Netanyahu wing are overtly siding with Republicans and thereby branding the entire project as a right-wing conservative cause. They're tainting their precious beloved Zionism and making it toxic for liberals, who comprise one half of the political power base in the US and West more generally.

And they know that after 2016 that is why a Tlaib and Omar and AOC were elected and for the first time in a very long time if not ever the US political class had a representative for the Palestinian side.

The liberal base will be absolutely enraged and furious that Netanyahu and that wing of the genocidal Zionist project threw the election to Trump, and they will act accordingly no matter how desperately the Dem establishment will throw themselves on that bomb and go "NO ACTUALLY IT WAS IRAN! RUSSIA! CHINA!!! NOT ISRAEL, IT WAS NOT ISRAEL!!!!"

And again, none of this is speculative. It happened in 2016, and now it will be on a much grander scale given how much more overt and explicit the Netanyahu wing's backing of Trump has been.

Also no one can dispute what Lawrence O'Donnell says in the clip below about how politics works. If Greens, West and others weren't running Kamala would be even more emboldened in her depraved genocidal Zionist neoliberal mania. That's an indisputable fact: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1826705116784717999

Yes but still Netanyahu prefers Kamala Harris!!! (link to thread)

Netanyahu believes he will be better off with Trump, and Benny Gantz believes he will be better off with Kamala, just as David Frum believes the latter while Ben Shapiro believes the former. The question is: Why do these figures who all have the same steadfast fanatical devotion to the genocidal Israeli death cult have the luxury to pick and choose between Kamala and Trump as if it's a choice of what color clothing to wear or flavor of ice cream to have?

Because it's utterly meaningless. As I said in that thread, it's like two field marshals in the Nazi high command in 1941 having a tactical disagreement over which village to take first.

But there's a more important point I also mentioned there, and that is the argument put forth by the David Frum/Bill Kristol/Jeffrey Goldberg/Sam Harris/Benny Gantz/Isaac Herzog types.

They believe that if Israel goes too far to the right and becomes too explicit in its disdain and hatred of liberal pieties, too open in their glee for murder and rape, they will lose one half of the Western political class and its base permanently, and in doing so, they will mortally threaten the very existence of their beloved Israel and its ability to successfully complete the genocide and establish Greater Israel.

Instead, they believe that it is essential for Israel's survival and to allow it to effectively complete the ongoing genocide to launder it with the rhetoric and symbolism that appeals to this very same liberal class. Israel is just defending itself, it adheres to international humanitarian law, it punishes rapists rather than celebrating them a la Ben Gvir, it's "the only democracy in the Middle East".

And who can most effectively aid them in this effort? They correctly have decided that that's Kamala Harris. The black woman who will drape her identity markers over Israel as an impenetrable protective shield, and the entire liberal class will happily join her in that effort, because after all, it's their duty to do so for the first black woman president. That's a given.

Also, she gives them the cover of liberal rights speak as they commence the genocide: We believe in Palestinian self-determination, as ethnic cleansing commences, we believe in Palestinian human rights, as Gaza is resettled, we believe in the sovereignty of the Palestinian people, as the West Bank is formally annexed.

That's much more effective. It gives not only the entire rights crowd in the West the language and rhetoric they need to justify and launder it all, including at all the major media organizations, but also the Arab puppets in Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, who will also love that they can say: Look, momala says she believes in Palestinian sovereignty and human rights! Ignore the annexations and ethnic cleansings, she sees and hears us and them!

It's not an accident that historically Israeli Labour governments have been much more successful in forwarding the project of Greater Israel than Likud has been, as Norman notes in the clip below:

How do you know that Netanyahu's estimation of how Israel can best and most effectively complete the genocide with a Trump rather than a Kamala, by just going entirely mask-off and losing the liberal class and all the institutional heft that comes with it and opposition that engenders rather than its active support, is more accurate than the estimation of the Goldbergs, Frums, Haim Sabans and Bill Mahers?

The answer is that you don't know. And Netanyahu doesn't know.

So this appeal to Netanyahu's belief that he will be better off with adopting this tactic for the genocide rather than that tactic for the genocide even though they're both the same strategy, is just intrinsically based on flawed logic and assumptions.

Incidentally, since you mention Chomsky, this is exactly why his "lesser evilism" argument was always incoherent. It assumed that a utilitarian calculus is possible, that you can accurately predict the future based on the present concerning something so contingent and volatile as politics, when the entirety of history, including US electoral history, completely disproves that.

Just one example of that: If you don't have Clinton in the 1990s and the neoliberal revolution, then you don't have Trump in 2016. So the "lesser evil" at the time turned out to be the "greater evil" in the longer term, shifting the entire political spectrum to the right. That's also Chomsky btw.

Anyway, I addressed the entire flaw of the utilitarian thinking underling "lesser evilism" in greater detail in the threads here: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1830407553206894979

Liberal pseudo-radicals do not actually believe in “lesser evilism”, as they never apply it to any other context aside from advancing their personal careers in the media and political class by browbeating everyone into submission to them during elections, Part One (link to thread)

The Western progressive liberal-left cretins demand you must denounce Hamas, otherwise you are beyond the pale. But you must also vote for Joe Biden, the butcher of Iraq, who has the blood of a million Iraqis on his hands. These are the scum who moralize without shame.

Joe Biden has killed millions of people, hundreds of thousands of women and children and babies, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Palestine. But you must love him. He is our daddy. He licks icecream. He is the lesser evil. Oh you didn't denounce Hamas? MONSTER, MONSTER.

No fuck you you scumbags. You are genocidal depraved scum. You don't care about human life, you are in the death cult of the US empire. The mass murder of children, women, is like the killing of insects to you. Then you dare pose as brave moral paragons. Look at this:

Yanis Varoufakis: "Those who are trying to extract from people like me a condemnation of Hamas will never get it. And they won't for a very simple reason. Apartheid is always going to procure violence. The criminals here are not Hamas. It is the West."

Here is deal for you AOC, Bernie, Naomi Klein, all this liberal-left trash that is now beating its chest "OMG WE HATE HAMAS, WE PROMISE, THE TANKIES ARE EVIL, ANTISEMITES!!": I will denounce Hamas when you denounce and refuse support for Biden. Have minimal moral integrity, scum

American progressive soc dems: "Sure, Hamas is bad, they do some terrible stuff, but their policy on trade unions and healthcare and the climate is better than that of Republicans, so we have to support them." This is actually unfair, because Biden has mass murdered millions.

Liberal pseudo-radicals do not actually believe in “lesser evilism”, as they never apply it to any other context aside from advancing their personal careers in the media and political class by browbeating everyone into submission to them during elections, Part Two (link to thread)

If liberals actually believed in "lesser evilism" they would all support Hamas and Hezbollah, as by any conceivable metric they are Saints as compared to not only the genocidal Israeli rape and death-cult, but also their cult leaders like Genocide Butcher of Iraq Joe and Kamala.

Genocide Joe is a serial sadistic rapist (see https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1772813078784000443), and has personally overseen the mass murder and rape of millions of babies, children, boys, girls, women and men across the world since he began his political career, up to this very second in Palestine and Lebanon. Liberals turned him into a kind ice-cream loving grandpa, and then got their "progressive" cuck faction to demand everyone support him as the "lesser evil".

Genocidal Zionist Rape Queen Kamala Harris began her career laundering and enabling pedophilic mass rape, and continues to do so in Palestine today (see https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1831114747829248016), as she campaigns with Liz and Dick Cheney who killed and raped millions: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1760300961388478841

So liberals and "progressives" are perfectly happy, in fact gleeful, about supporting these mass murdering, baby beheading, pedophilic rapist genocidal scum, and in fact idolize them, turn them into fun cute meme-politicians, momala coconut pilled, but Hamas is pure evil.

No, you are pure evil, and the entirety of the rest of the world outside your small depraved pathological bubble of narcissistic scum-fuck freaks knows it. And they despise you, because they see you for what you are behind your thin veneer of smug self-satisfied pseudo-moralism that you desperately use to browbeat everyone into submission to your genocidal Zionist death and rape-cult.

One more day.

I was watching this Pod Save America episode a while back, a mistake that I will never make again, and these smug liberal scumfuck cunts were sitting there going "oh my god, Hezbollah is so evil, they're so terrorist and evil, do you remember when they supposedly targeted civilians? Oh my god, they're so sub-human and evil!"

These are ghouls who were officials in the Obama regime, that literally brought back slave markets to Libya (see https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1672335941199884289) They oversaw a vast pedophilic child trafficking and murder network in Afghanistan. US troops created and maintained that network under Obama (see https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1732075587865367034), as these Pod Save cunt bros were whitewashing and laundering it all for him. These scum have murdered and raped across the world personally, singlehandedly, to such a vast extent, numbering in the hundreds of thousands if not millions, and then they sit on a podcast and play the paragons of moral virtue: "Ummm, Nasrallah was a bad guy, he's the modern Hitler."

No, you are the modern Hitlers, and the fact that you can make millions sitting on a bullshit podcast pontificating about how moral and saintly you are as you denounce those evil dirty brown sub-humans, just reveals the sick depravity of the Fourth Reich US-NATO empire in which you live and thrive.

Liberal pseudo-radicals do not actually believe in “lesser evilism”, as they never apply it to any other context aside from advancing their personal careers in the media and political class by browbeating everyone into submission to them during elections, Part Three (link to thread)

The Houthis are pure evil monster spawns from Hell who must be bombed mercilessly and killed. Also Joe Biden is a kind old grandpa progressive liberal Saint and his genocidal mass murder of millions of Iraqis, Afghans and Palestinians is irrelevant and everyone must support him.

Do you see how depraved Western liberals and pseudo-radical "soc dems" are? How they invoke their deranged Lesser Evil Principle to justify supporting a genocidal mass killer, then quickly withdraw it when it comes to anyone daring to resist the US empire?

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1712159989362467325

Here you have genocide Joe Biden, serial rapist who has killed millions, hundreds of thousands of children, tens of thousands of babies, and that's just outside the US, and these depraved cunt cretins Sanctify him while Hamas and the Houthis are pure evil:

https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1732174147206230259

What happened to your bullshit "Lesser Evilism" that you love browbeating everyone with into supporting a genocidal serial rapist mass killer? Western liberals have no principles, only interests. More specifically US-NATO-Israeli imperial interests. They are the purest scum alive.

Whenever you see liberals daring to pull this move on you, ask them: Do you support Hamas and the Houthis against the genocidal Israeli regime because they are clearly the "lesser evil" by your own proclaimed standard for moral action? They will say no. Then tell them to fuck off.

Whatever you do, do not vote for genocide serial rapist Joe Biden. Vote for Jill Stein, Cornel West, the PSL candidates Claudia De la Cruz and Karina Garcia, or just abstain. That is the only principled and coherent action for anyone with basic moral decency and humanity.

This is actually fucking insane. We are talking about not voting for genocide Joe being some horrific morally fraught thing to do. That genocidal mass killer should be arrested and charged with war crimes and hanged. The depravity of the liberal class knows no bounds.

When you dare resist the US-NATO-Israeli empire, the entire Western media class, with liberals leading the way, immediately jump into action to vilify you as pure evil spawns from hell. Bolsheviks, Mao, Castro, Viet Cong, and now Hamas and the Houthis: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1716223745365328127

The methods are always the same: Baby killers, rapists, beheaders, torturers, terrorists. This atrocity propaganda with manufactured "evidence" is deployed to provide talking points to liberals and pseudo-radicals to disseminate further. They admitted it: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1719700058583482770

But no matter how much these depraved genocidal scumbags lie, from the NYT and BBC to pedophile YouTubers and gusano streamers, it will not wipe away the courage and heroism of those who dared take up arms against the murderous US-NATO-Israeli empire: https://x.com/zei_squirrel/status/1746447473629864225

The fundamental incoherence and inanity of the foundation of utilitarian “lesser evilism” pseudo-logic masquerading as hyper-rational realistic political analysis, Part One (link to thread)

You shouldn't take anyone who bases their politics on a proclaimed utilitarian calculus seriously because it's an inherently normative position masquerading as based on Reason and Principle. for example Biden's body count is infinitely higher than trump's, just with Iraq + crime bill.

Then the counterargument will be "yeah but that's in the past, we only look to the future!" seems like quite a shitty moral system as that'd absolve Hitler and anyone else as long as you pick the right time-frame. but ok, let's go with that: only future actions, Biden vs Trump.

Anyone arguing that a Biden admin isn't highly likely to cause less harm than a trump admin in that specific time-frame isn't being serious. Yes, for the 4 to 8 years of a dem-run white house, there'll most likely be a lower body count produced. but time doesn't stop after that.

Simply negating the longer term effects of a Biden admin from your utilitarian calculus, which is what every hack who proclaims to be Reasonable and Principled does either implicitly or explicitly, means you're just fine-tuning the calculus to suit your ideological needs/biases.

Just as trump didn't appear out of nowhere but was the product of decades of neoliberal policies pushed by republicans and, crucially, entrenched by dems, whatever spike in body count caused after a Biden admin must be taken into account as well. and that doesn't look pretty.

We have evidence from Clinton and Obama that what came after was an exponentially worse outcome, with spikes in body count. hell, dems like Biden happily went along with causing it, like with the iraq war. there is no reason to believe the same won't happen after a Biden admin.

Anyone saying otherwise by fine-tuning the time-frame to limit it to 4 or 8 years while pretending this is Scientific, Reasonable, Principled, is lying to you. they're a scam-artist. and the reason they're doing it is because they have no better arguments to make. it's pathetic.

If you want to make an argument based on intrinsic values, like how one should act to prevent any harm being done under any circumstances (Chomsky's view may appear utilitarian but if you inspect it more closely it's based on a deontological core), that's fine. I can respect that.

At least that's honest and doesn't pretend to be based on some bullshit moral arithmetic that in fact is the height of immorality because it excuses all the untold harm done by ghouls like Biden in the past while erasing from view all of it that will be done in his wake.

I've discussed the inherent incoherence of purely consequentialist/utilitarian approaches in more detail in this thread. basically it's ideology masquerading as Reason and Principle. works great on 14 year olds under the spell of some surrogate e-daddy.

The fundamental incoherence and inanity of the foundation of utilitarian “lesser evilism” pseudo-logic masquerading as hyper-rational realistic political analysis, Part Two (link to thread)

The key problem with any kind of consequentialist ethics is that humans are fallible, not perfect rationality machines with perfect knowledge of reality and, by extension, the future (assuming determinism, which is itself a big assumption to make).

There are too many variables, which are constantly changing and shifting, to be able to have any kind of predictive ethical system upon which consequentialism relies. this remains the case even if you reduce the scale or add qualifiers like "likely outcomes" to any actions.

This is also why you often end with diametrically opposed actions that can both be reasonable justified by reference to consequentialism: due to the preponderance of variables which can be interpreted in a variety of ways (this or that aspect brought together in this or that way).

You can argue for communism with consequentialism, or you can argue for neoliberalism. hell, a nazi can make a consequentialist case. it's all just a reflection of your own normative biases/ideology, because there is no objective predictive system. we can't tell the future.

It doesn't provide a means by which to adjudicate between rival conceptions of the future, and it's impossible for any ethical system to do so, because again, we aren't perfect rationality machines, and that's assuming determinism.

Of course these are classic criticisms of consequentialist ethics, that it erects an absurd conception of humans as perfectly rational utilitarian calculus machines, which only exist in some philosophers' delusions. but too often people just take it for granted as common sense.

And that's taken advantage of by hacks who add it to their particular political positions to make it seem as if they're not outcomes of their particular normative dispositions, but rather of an Objective, Rational, Logical analysis of Reality, which they have perfect access to.

Don't buy into that bullshit. they can't tell the future. they're not infallible rationality machines. they're not somehow removed from ideology and just "telling it like it is". don't be browbeaten into believing you have to do something because they pretend they're demi-gods.

Anyway, I've always thought that utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics all grasp one aspect of humans' multifarious (and yes, contradictory) ways in which they deal with ethical issues. the same person switches from one to the other intuitively, depending on circumstances.

In embryonic form, as a kind of intuition, which is how most people use them, they're all fine. but cutting them out of a broader range of ethical dispositions & turning them into separate incompatible systems, while useful for academic seminars, is meaningless for everyday life.

Virtue ethicists (at least the good ones, which are typically the classics: stay far away from analytical philosophers doing virtue ethics) get closest to grasping this because they focus on the fallibility and contradictory nature of humans. See also Wittgenstein on ethics.