Skip to content

Fix to be the same specification as --exclude of rsync command (about function which is an alternative to rsync command) - #244

Merged
DeviaVir merged 4 commits into
motdotla:masterfrom
abetomo:fix_file_copy_exclude
Apr 25, 2017
Merged

Fix to be the same specification as --exclude of rsync command (about function which is an alternative to rsync command)#244
DeviaVir merged 4 commits into
motdotla:masterfrom
abetomo:fix_file_copy_exclude

Conversation

@abetomo

@abetomo abetomo commented Apr 25, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(After checking the operation a bit more in my environment, I will replace it with the _fileCopy function from the _rsync function.)

In order to make it easy to understand where test failed, I changed the way I write the test. (The meaning of the test has not changed.)

abetomo added 4 commits April 25, 2017 13:26
The rsync command `--exclude` can remove` lib/main.js` in `*main*`.
_fileCopy did not satisfy the specification, so I modified it
The rsync command `--exclude` can remove` lib/main.js` in `*main*`.
- To make it easy to understand what file failed
- Using `assert.include`
@DeviaVir
DeviaVir self-requested a review April 25, 2017 14:38

@DeviaVir DeviaVir left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Curious how this plays out, please continue 👍

@DeviaVir
DeviaVir merged commit a57f421 into motdotla:master Apr 25, 2017
@abetomo
abetomo deleted the fix_file_copy_exclude branch May 2, 2017 08:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants