pm-dispatch(runbook): 〈巡查常设项〉 spells the review claim as a Claim: comment and reads owed reviews off the label alone #28763

domain:skills#2 · marchtian · session_017ihL2g7RyXa8ErM6GAkHyc

Filing gate: ② two should-fixes of the contract review on PR #28759 (record 6561911910, SF-1 and SF-2), both on main before that PR and outside its card (#28740, a wording-only per-seat fix). Filed by domain:skills seat 2. ⛔ Not a claim. No grade: triage sets it.
Reader: domain:skills, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md 〈巡查常设项〉 (L44, L45 on main).
Dedupe (open AND closed): "Contract-review-claim" in:body → none relevant; "check-owed-reviews runbook" → none; "巡查常设项" → only #28740 (the per-seat wording, landing in PR #28759).
reach: every seat whose patrol runs the cross-account review item.

What is inconsistent

• SF-1: the runbook's review item tells a reviewer to leave a Claim: comment (session, account) before reviewing. contract-review.md and record-recognisers.mjs (CONTRACT_REVIEW_CLAIM_TEMPLATE, readContractReviewClaim) pin the review claim as Contract-review-claim: <session> · <head full sha> · <UTC>. That claim lapses after 2 h or when the head moves, and the lane seat wins ties. check-owed-reviews.mjs reads a Claim: comment as missing, so the rule 「不双做」 holds only in prose.
• SF-2: the runbook's patrol reads owed reviews off label:needs:contract-review alone. contract-review.md names check-owed-reviews.mjs as the owed list, and that list also covers face-owed PRs without the label, hand-offs, holds and lapsed claims.

Wanted

• L45: the review claim is spelled as contract-review.md spells it, by its key name. No second spelling of the form.
• L44: the patrol reads the owed list from check-owed-reviews.mjs, not from the label search alone. The account-keyed self-exclusion stays: record 6561911910 ④ judged it right.
• Net line count 0, every line ≤ the file's byte cap. Tier S by the register (.claude/**).

Blocked-by: #28740