Skip to content

update copyright to 2022#1097

Merged
dwhswenson merged 2 commits into
openpathsampling:masterfrom
sroet:update_copyright
Jul 24, 2022
Merged

update copyright to 2022#1097
dwhswenson merged 2 commits into
openpathsampling:masterfrom
sroet:update_copyright

Conversation

@sroet

@sroet sroet commented Jan 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Happy new year!

This updates the copyright I found with grep -rl "2021" ./ --exclude=*.{pdb}

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jan 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1097 (4d1b243) into master (97c2d51) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1097   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.76%   81.76%           
=======================================
  Files         142      142           
  Lines       15604    15604           
=======================================
  Hits        12758    12758           
  Misses       2846     2846           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 97c2d51...4d1b243. Read the comment docs.

@dwhswenson dwhswenson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks mostly good to me (after I added a commit to update LICENSE as well). One question is whether to change the name list in the docs copyright notice. That text shows up in the footer of every page in the docs, and I think it should be considered as primarily relating to the docs, as opposed to the code, which is covered in LICENSE. (Though, obviously, the code is used to generate the docs.)

I think this should acknowledge the existence of contributors beyond the original "gang of 4" that it currently lists. There are a few options here:

  • the contributors to OpenPathSampling: this is the text used in the license, which puts no emphasis on any particular person
  • David W.H. Swenson, Jan-Hendrik Prinz, John Chodera, Peter Bolhuis, and other contributors to OpenPathSampling: This is a bit wordy, but keeps everyone listed who is currently listed
  • David W.H. Swenson and other contributors to OpenPathSampling: here I'm taking credit for the fact that nearly all the text in the docs directory was written by me (which means that if any explanations on the website are poorly written, that's probably also my fault)

Any thoughts?

@sroet

sroet commented Jan 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Any thoughts?

Depends on your commitment to keeping them up to date 😉. If you are committed to that, I would go for option 3 (as you said, you are responsible for most of the text), otherwise I would go for option 1. (no one particular claims responsibility). However, I would at least ping the other contributors if you plan on dropping their names.

@dwhswenson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Not worrying about changing who the copyright credits right now. Let's merge this instead of waiting until 2023. 🤣

@dwhswenson dwhswenson merged commit 86a756c into openpathsampling:master Jul 24, 2022
@sroet sroet deleted the update_copyright branch July 25, 2022 08:19
@dwhswenson dwhswenson mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants