Potential fix for flaky PyEMMA tests in 2.7#997
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #997 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 80.58% 80.58%
=======================================
Files 138 138
Lines 14671 14671
=======================================
Hits 11823 11823
Misses 2848 2848 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
This is ready for review and comment. I will leave it open for at least 24 hours, merging no earlier than Thu 25 Mar 09:00 GMT (10:00 local). |
|
Do you mind adding a label/milestone indicating that this is fix for just python |
I agree with the principle, but no need in this case. This notebook is about old-style CVs and netcdfplus, both of which will be replaced in 2.0, when we also drop 2.7. So the whole notebook will be removed then. (I'll probably use some of the current notebook as a guide to write tests for SimStore-based |
I've been having problems with PyEMMA tests being flaky in Py2.7 ever since #987. It seems like there's something that sometimes shows up in stderr, which ipynbtest didn't check but apparently nbval does. The error I get is:
This PR adds ignores to that cell and another near it that also may cause problems.