[3.7] bpo-36895: document time.clock() has been removed in 3.8#13287
Merged
vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from May 13, 2019
Merged
[3.7] bpo-36895: document time.clock() has been removed in 3.8#13287vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from
vstinner merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from
Conversation
vstinner
approved these changes
May 13, 2019
Member
vstinner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM.
Not quite sure about the pull-request title, this is not a backport so there is no gh-XXXX
That's ok.
3438d28 to
4b1e143
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
I force-pushed a new commit, the commit message had a typo, and was linking to the wrong issue. |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
--
Not quite sure about the pull-request title, this is not a backport so there is no gh-XXXX
https://bugs.python.org/issue36895